Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Asset Link/Kearns Claimform - old HBOS Credit Card Debt - Now N244


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 91 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Andyorch said:

 

 

DEFENCE

 

 1. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

2. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have in the past had financial dealings with Bank Of Scotland. However, I am unable to recall the agreement reference and particulars referred to within the claimant's particulars and have sought further validation by way of a CCA section 78 request.

 

3. Paragraph 3 is denied. I am unaware of any service of a Default Notice (s) pursuant to section 87 of the consumer credit act by either the original creditor or assignee.

 

4. Paragraph 5 is denied I have no knowledge of any legal assignment. I have never been served any Notice of Assignment from either the original creditor or the claimant pursuant to the Law of Property Act 1925.

 

5. On 28th February 2023 I sent a formal request to Asset Link Capital for a copy of the original agreement and statements of account to (who) pursuant to section 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. To date the Claimant has failed to comply with s78 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 and by virtue of s78 (6) Consumer Credit Act 1974 cannot enforce the agreement.

 

6. As advised during a telephone conversation with Kearns Solicitors, on 23rd March 2023, I sent a formal request to Kearns Solicitors for a copy of the original agreement and statements of account to (who) pursuant to section 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. To date the Claimant has failed to comply with s78 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 and by virtue of s78 (6) Consumer Credit Act 1974  and therefore prevented from enforcing any alleged agreement.

 

7.  On 12th April 2023,  I sent a further formal request to Kearns Solicitors and Asset Link Capital for a copy of the original agreement and statements of account to (who) pursuant to section 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 along with the statutory £1 fee to both. To date the Claimant has failed to comply with s78 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 and by virtue of s78 (6) Consumer Credit Act 1974 and therefore prevented from enforcing any alleged agreement. 

 

8. On 12th April 2023, I sent a Civil Procedure Rule 31.14 letter to Kearns Solicitors. I requested they provide copies of the Agreement, Default Notice, Notice of Assignment and Statement of Account. To date Kearns Solicitors have not sent any of these documents to me. 

 

9. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of assignment/balance/breach requested by CPR 31. 14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and

(b) show and evidence the nature of any breach and service of a Default Notice;

(c) show how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and

(d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

10. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

 

 

 

Checked......just a few tweaks made,

 

Andy

 

Just as well as that's not the version I posted earlier...use the above ...you can email it to MCOL

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Watch mcol status.

 

You should receive ack from the court.

 

Now get reading those threads so you know what's next, how to respond and what comes after that..please!!

 

But dont no anything without checking here first 

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, stevehatesbankers said:

Hi Andy

I can confirm the correct Defence has been sent

Cheers 

 

Is it case of them contacting me or do I keep contacting the County Court on a regular basis for updates

 

Phew...not sure why you posted the one above in # 26 none of the responses connect to the particulars.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the court has your address,

 

if it does move forward and not get autostayed because link dont respond to the court within about 33 days (barring any court delays in processing)  you get a blank n180 from the court to fullin

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

yes, matters not. std practice.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi 

Just to provide an update.

 

I received a letter from Kearns a few days ago acknowledging receipts of my previous CCA and CPR 31.14 requests and stating they require time to acquire and compile papers from their client.

 

They further confirm that a hold has been placed on the account and no default judgement shall be requested within 14 days of the date the disclosed documents are provided.

 

As it happens, it has now passed the 33 days from request so would you suggest I contact the courts to see if the case has been set aside

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 14/04/2023 at 16:29, dx100uk said:

Well the court has your address,

 

if it does move forward and not get autostayed because link dont respond to the court within about 33 days (barring any court delays in processing)  you get a blank n180 from the court to fullin

 

Dx

 

check mcol claim history weekly

watchout for mention of DQ N180 being sent out

 

if it stays at defence filing for say 2mts THEN start cheering. its stayed and it will then cost the fleecers >£100 to lift the stay if they are that brave.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

They further confirm that a hold has been placed on the account and no default judgement shall be requested within 14 days of the date the disclosed documents are provided.

 

Cant anyway you have submitted a defence...check the status on MCOL by logging into your account.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

been like that since 14-04 has it not?

wonder what you did wrong?

 

as you filed defence ok by MCOL.

 

why not ring and ask.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well phone tomorrow and ask the status of the claim then.......

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Managed to speak to the Courts today (having waited an hour and 20 minutes on the phone) to be told that it is now stayed (22/05/2023) due to no response from Link/Kearns. No doubt they will be manufacturing new docs for them to use against me 

Link to post
Share on other sites

not unless they want to pay upwards of >£108 to do so..

and if they want to provide new evidence it will be £275

 

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well,

after 2 months,

Kearns has sent me a copy of

the agreement,

T&Cs,

default notice

although they do look like they have been doctored.

I spoke to the Courts and they have stated they havent received anything from Kearns as yet although there was a backlog with their post.

Unsure where to start

would appreciate any assistance as where to start first

Link to post
Share on other sites

unless they've sent you a n244 and paid an application fee to lift the stay...dead duck ignore them.

if you wish to scan it all to one multipage pdf please do so

read upload carefully please.

dx.

 

 

.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers dx 100uk,

I will try and scan everything up tomorrow.

Surprisingly, in their letter they state they have sent everything then state that if I would like to settle the matter without the necessity of progressing to a court hearing.

They invite me to sign and return an attached proforma with an offer of monthly payments that are affordable (they refused to do this previously)

however, the proforma is an admission of guilt, admit the claim in full and me withdrawing my defence 

Link to post
Share on other sites

std begging letter they always send. trying to make out they are all powerful and you are just a stupid debtor. if so...why did the oc sell the debt for 10p=£1 and not crush you themselves in court...urm,,,,

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Help required please.

My original posts have been closed due to inactivity I have opened this one.

I have received a letter from the courts N24 and N244 stating Asset Link Capital, after 7 months,  have lifted the stay and the claim may continue and the N120 form must be returned to the courts by 7th March

Link to post
Share on other sites

threads merged. and retitled

please scan up everything you have received to one mass pdf in date order please. inc their ws/exhibits too.

read upload carefully, use the online websites listed where necessary

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Asset Link/Kearns Claimform - old HBOS Credit Card Debt - Now N244
Posted (edited)

Thanks dx100uk, I am trying to scan documents on my phone but the message says total files are larger than 33MB and asking me to upload to onedrive and share a link. I am not the most technically gifted so is it ok to send smaller files

Alternatively, I am happy to email to a private email if that helps

Edited by stevehatesbankers
Link to post
Share on other sites

PM sent.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...