Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Apple Air Pods Max


jjphillips
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 614 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In February this year I bought a pair of Apples AirPods Max. They worked great for about a week.

 

stopped connecting to my iPad.

I spoke to the online help and arranged to send them back. I was told that the fault was due to me having wore them out side in the rain. I’d have to pay for a repair. I decided to have them returned unrepaired . Then I’d have to fight this.

 

I got them back and discovered that they had sent someone else’s AirPods Max. I told apple that the serial number on the original box was not the same as the serial number on the headset they had sent back. I uploaded photos as requested. Then they said that they would send me a new set . I was happy with that. I was promised a number of times that I’d have the new set in two days and the representative would keep in touch. Like I said this was a long process.

 

It was weeks later by the time I got them. As a gesture of goodwill I could pick something from the Apple on line store upto the value of £100. Not much choice so I got the ipencil. New set works well for around a week and started with the same problem as before.

 

I got the email address for Tim Cook and thought it’d be a long shot. Next day I get a call from Apple who arranged for a new set. But I had lost faith that these would work and said I’d rather have a refund that I’d put to a new MacBook Pro.

They never responded to that.

 

I think I’ve had four sets now and the latest set are just as faulty as before. I got an email a few days ago saying that as a gesture of goodwill they would arrange the return and I’d get a full refund.

 

now it’s October.

Is the refund really goodwill or do I have the right to get a refund?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jjphillips said:

Is the refund really goodwill or do I have the right to get a refund?

 

its just the way these retailers try to hide faulty products refunds by saying its a GOGW.

 

 

i will guess originally these were an online order?

if so under your consumer rights you have 14 days to return ANY product and get a full refund for no reason.

upto 30days you can send faulty products back for a full refund.

 

the fact that, subsequent products also failed, does not 'break the chain'- as long as the above time limits apply each time to each replacement product.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would I be cheeky if I wanted compensation?

 

I’ve tried from the very beginning to just get the repair.

 

I had a serious penetrating brain injury a while ago. As a result I can’t use the phone. No matter how many times I said I couldn’t use the Phone they just kept ignoring my email and replying using the template email to say we feel that this matter would be better over the phone. They just wouldn’t relent. 
 

well any way Thank you any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not within consumer law no. Only by them making a GOGW. Ironically eh?

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...