Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

American Express late payments over the last 8 years.. no default or CCAs chasing me.


schwetta
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 565 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, I have an outstanding balance with American Express, they have never defaulted this account, always marked it as a "Late Payment", and it's now dropped off my credit.

I have been making £2 payments, and they diligently send me statements every month so it's very much a live debt...

 

Wonder if a SAR is worth it at all, and is the way out really just a full and final settlement?

 

Thanks in advance for your time and consideration!!!

 

 

 

 

Amex BA Card (Firstsource Advantage LLC India) £3,994
Last Payment: £2 on Aug 22 to Firstsource Advantage LLC India
Dropped off Credit Report
Lender – American Express Services Europe LTD
Account Type – Credit Card
Status – Dropped off credit report, never defaulted
Account Start Date – May 2008

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why are you paying an indian solicitor?

Send amex a cca request.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

 

 

Amex have sent through "Original Application Form and Terms and Conditions, which form the Executed Agreement"... not sure if that does form the signed CCA?

 

 

 

They've also sent through a letter from Sep 2011: "We are writing to tell you about some changes we're making to your Credit Card Account Agreement, which will take effect from 22 November 2011".

 

This also does NOT form a CCA....

 

Amex CCA Response 28Sep22 _Redacted Optimized.pdf

 

Ok figured out how to optimise the pdf... here is a single document.. thank you this is what I will do going forward!

 

Repeating here to make it easier:

 

They have sent through documents but not sure these are a signed CCA:

 

  • "Original Application Form and Terms and Conditions, which form the Executed Agreement"
  • A letter from Sep 2011: "We are writing to tell you about some changes we're making to your Credit Card Account Agreement, which will take effect from 22 November 2011"

 

 

Appreciate your help as always..

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so page 5 is the imp one. looks ok 

though it looks like 4 & 5 are backed, one the reverse of the other?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Urm...how can you have a filed out application forms asking for them to issue a card on one side and a signed agreement on its reverse from you? Something smells 

Though separately  they would probably mean the agreement was executed 

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...