Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • retailer said they'd speak to dpd on Tuesday. I don't want to screw the retailer because they were doing me a favour by fixing it for free  I hope dpd will refund them so they don't lose out. Will keep you guys posted. 
    • Well, we live on the same road so it should be the same postcode. When I spoke to dpd and asked why were my neighbours' address not on the list and she said maybe they're not of the same postcode and I checked and they definitely were. Not to mention, delivery instructions are supposed to override actual customer's address which is why they asked for instructions I thought.
    • again a quick google search states Appeal a DVLA fine - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) i would not be appealing mind. it's only a summary charge which they rarely do court on and pass out the powerless DCA's whom are not bailiffs they have 6mts. see where they go. as you've sorn'd it will probably be nulled. dx  
    • There are a number of reasons why you may not have been issued a notice in the post within 14 days. If you were stopped by the police it may have been given verbally. In the case of speeding offences, the police may issue you with a conditional offer of a fixed penalty of 3 points and £100.00 fine by post or an offer of a speed awareness course. If the offence is considered too serious for a speed awareness course or fixed penalty you may be charged with an offence which normally occurs by way of the issue of a Single Justice Procedure Notice. If the vehicle within which the alleged offence took place was registered to another person or company there is technically no need for a notice to be issued to the driver. After the police have obtained details of the nominated the driver, they will normally send the notice to them, although there are no time limits within which they must do so (provided that the notice was received within 14 days by the registered keeper of the vehicle). In such circumstances, a person may receive a notice several months after the alleged offence too place but still be prosecuted. A Guide to a Notice of Intended Prosecution | Motoring Offence Lawyers the above copy n paste link has purely been copy n pasted here to inform you of the regs, which you could have done yourself by, as this is, a google search......... we do not ever recommend using such offered webservices! dont dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Premier/BW ANPR PCN claimform - Overstay - Lldl & PureGym 20 Castle Bridge Rd Notts NG7 IGX - Help with WS ***Claim Dismissed****


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 631 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have been following a few threads on this forum and the advice given on them, however now I am stuck on how to write a witness statement.

 

I have the need to create a witness statement for my parking fine and have no idea how to do this.

 

To give some context, back in July 2019 I parked where I assumed the car park was 3 hrs, unfortunately it was 2 and my stay was 2.45 mins.

This has led to BW Legal demanding £260. 

I ignored all letters from bw legal until i received a letter from the courts,

I googled and acknowledged the court as well as sending my defence.

 

The car park previously was a free car park for 3hrs and was owned by PC World, Back in 2018 PC world left these premises and the car park remained close until around May 2019 thats when Lidl and PureGym opened up,

 

From what I can remember there were no clear signs on display informing me this car park had a max stay time of 2hrs, its a part of a retail park and usually people spend between 2-3 hrs there. Driving to the car park today there is a pretty clear sign informing drivers that its a max stay of 2 hrs but this was not present in July 2019.

 

I have checked google maps and the latest image (apart from the most recent from april 2022) is Aug 2018 and this was when the car park was blocked off, so how would i go about writing a witness statement ?

 

I see lots of statements where people are adding pics of the car park etc but unfortunately any pics I take will be from now and it is pretty clear that this is a 2hr car park. I don't have access to a Delorean which can reach speeds of up to 88 mph so time travel is out of the question :(

 

I have a court date of August 12 and I need to get my witness statement in before July 15, I have no idea on how to do this :(

 

I have come up with the following so far :


In July 2019 the approach and entrance to the car park had no clear signage stating the max car park was 2 hrs

In July 2019 at the point of entry there was no signage present , any signage with with terms and conditions was neither visible nor readable.

 

This car park had recently opened in May 2019 when new owners Lidl/Pure Gym took over, previously this car park was owned by PC World and had a 3 hr limit.

The area around Lidl/Pure Gym is part of a shopping Village with numerous shops, most people tend to spend 2-3 hrs shopping  which gives them enough time to get around the shops and restaurants.
 
Any help greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks,

Goofa
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Premier/BW ANPR PCN claimform - Help needed with Witness statement

Hi,

 

Apologies for not reading the stickies and diving in! I have provided the info requested

 

*******

Which Court have you received the claim from ?

MCOL Northampton N1


If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. (not the response page or AOS)
Its in post 3 above

 

Name of the Claimant :
Premier Parking Limited
48 Queensgate House
Queen Street
Exeter
Devon
EX4 3SR
 

Claimants Solicitors: (if one is stated)
BW Legal
Enterprise House
1 Apex View
Leeds
LS11 9BH
 

Date of issue – 3 Dec 2021

 

Date to submit Defence -  17/12/2021

 

What is the claim for – 

 

1.The claim is for the sum of £117.70 being due from the defendant in respect of a parking charge notice (PCN) for a contractual breach which occurred on 2/7/19 in the private car park/lat at Lidl & PureGym Nottingham - Lidl & Puregym 20 Castle Bridge Road Nottingham NG7.


2.The PCN was issued as the driver failed to comply with the terms and conditions as displayed. 


3.Despite demands, the charge remains unpaid.

 

4.The claim also includes statutory interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum (a daily rate of £0.02) from 2/7/19 to 2/12/21 being an amount of £17.70. 


The claimant also claims £60.00 recovery costs as set out in the Terms and Conditions and in the ATA AoS Code of Practice.


What is the value of the claim?


Amount Claimed 177.70

court fees 35.00
 
legal rep fees 50.00

Total Amount 262.70

*******

 

I have attached the CPR31:14, BW Legals response to CPR, and the letter of claim.

 

ok combined the docs into a pdf now.

letter-of-claim-combined.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Premier/BW ANPR PCN claimform - Overstay - Lldl & PureGym 20 Castle Bridge Rd Notts NG7 IGX - Help with WS

Attached  PCN

pcn.pdf

 

I have just had a look at the retail parks website  and it does mention 3 hrs free parking. Why would a car park in the same area, advertised as the part of the same retail park allow only 2 hrs and the rest are 3hrs ? 

WWW.CASTLEMARINASHOPPING.COM

Castle Marina Retail Park Nottingham | Shopping for furniture, carpets, kitchens, technology, pregnancy, mothers, children, babies | High street stores | 3 hour free parking

 

Edited by goofa316
Link to post
Share on other sites

The address on the claim form is :

 

Lidl & PureGym

20 Castle Bridge Road

Nottingham

NG7

 

I have also checked the planning permission on Nottinghamshire county councils site and have attached the car park management plan for the site, on section 5.5 it mentions all car park users will be eligible to park for free for up to 2 hrs .

 

 

 

CAR_PARK_MANAGEMENT_PLAN-1361830.PDF

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice, In regards to the governments CoP.. it seems this has been withdrawn ? 

WWW.GOV.UK

The Code of Practice sets out the requirements that private parking operators must follow when enforcing parking restrictions in England, Scotland and Wales.

 

Should i still try to use it anyway ?

 

and No the fleecers havent sent their WS yet and no they dont have my email.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice witness statement updated, Deadline is 15th July, Should I email my Witness statement to the court tomorrow morning and post to fleecers tomorrow as well ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hey guys, bwlegal have sent their witness statement, I have scanned in their response. They have sent images where it states the car park is 3 hrs (page 31) , then another which says 2hrs (page 33)

 

Please let me know whether I need to modify my witness statement in relation to anything thing they have sent.

 

 

fleecers_witness2_compressed.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

MSe site was used for my defence way back in December before i was aware of this site.

 

Any letter of claim that was sent by the courts has been responded to and responses sent to both court and bwlegal. The request for cpr was sent in December and a response was received at the end of March.

Snail mail used for all responses, no recorded just normal post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Damn, i emailed court and snailed fleecers but had never heard of free proof of posting until now 🤷🏾‍♂️ So dont have it.. is it worth posting again and getting the proof or is it ok ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

just got out of the virtual court, lasted over an hr!

 

So bwlegals rep tried to disregard my witness statement because they didn't receive it until the 4th August,  Judge  asked me when it was posted, told him 15th, he asked why it wasn't posted before that to ensure it go to the solicitors on time, basically told him I am defending myself, im not a solicitor and to put my defense together takes time and i only relieved bwlegals response on the 14th , and I did email the court on the 15th once I had completed it.. Judge was happy with response 1-0 to me :)

 

Then the solicitor went on a spree about all the appendices... images etc and to disregard the 3 hr  images and use the new witness statement, I asked to speak and pretty much nailed it with lookinforinfo's response :)

 

Solicitor asked me whether I agree that the parking is 2 hrs or not, i said in July 2019 I would have said no, its 3 hrs like the rest of the retail park. He asked did you read the signage, I said no.. i have parked in the retail park all the time and its been 3 hrs, i referred them to the website which states puregym is part of castle marina retail and it states 3hrs, solicitor gave some bs and asked to disregard that as its third party.. 

 

Then the judge had his final say.. and to be honest it felt like being in the apprentice board room.. one minute i'm like crap this isn't looking good, then its like.. oh this looks good.. then its like oh crap i've lost... summing up Judge said the images provided by the claimant provide no help whatsoever, you can't even read the images.. The 3 hr parking image is legit, if you look at it closely it is  a proper sign and not a dummy image like BWlegal were claiming (tbh i didnt notice that) There are no images of the car park signage on the date of the overstay.. so claim failed!!

 

I WIN !

 

Well i should say we win, I could not have done this without you guys huge thanks for everyone who helped :)  and i'll make a donation to this site to help others :)

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • brassnecked changed the title to Premier/BW ANPR PCN claimform - Overstay - Lldl & PureGym 20 Castle Bridge Rd Notts NG7 IGX - Help with WS *** Won in Court ****
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...