Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hurrah! We got there.  After asking four times about the defence you've answered. To win this you will have to be a hell of a lot more pro-active and get reading up.  The standard defence is on every single claim form thread here. So first task for the evening. Go to  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/393251-received-a-court-claim-from-a-private-parking-speculative-invoice-how-to-deal-with-it-hereupdated-dec-2021/ Scroll down to  Q2) How should I defend? There is the standard defence. Change (6) into (7) and add a new (6). 6.  In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. Get if filed this evening.
    • OK, relenting on my above irritated post ... It's worth defending it.  At the very least they are likely to offer a deal. Plus  PE have added two completely invented amounts.  The £100 charge has morphed into £125.  Then they've added £50 legal representative's costs although they have no legal representative.  Even if it went all the way to court and you lost, the  judge would likely disallow the made up £25 + £50. Please fill in the sticky as dx asked. Then dx will be on with details of how to defend.
    • Quite interesting that the Conservative East Midlands  Mayor candidate doesnt mention conservative on his promotion LOL   but he does claim that he, a Conservative politician, is the man to fix the 14 years of Conservative devastation of the region - inc 'fixing' problems inc the utter devastation of the roads, bus and train services that his party have  imposed   Must all rotate around the meaning of fixing he actually means .. fixing noun dishonest activity to make certain that a competition, race, or election is won by a particular person:   .. or perhaps he just means 'fixing' - preventing change
    • Yes, absolutely normal for them to waste everybody's time and money by asking for more time – which they are entitled to do, of course – but it is simply a waste of time. They use prepared template defences. They know they are in the wrong but they simply want to make your life tough because they don't care about you. However do keep an eye out. You never know there is just a 1% chance that they could miss the deadline in which case you should apply for judgement immediately.
    • Will check back in when the SAR from MCB is back and get advice on how to raise the formal complaint and what to say x
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

I started on DMP with stepchange. Can i complain about drafty and 118118 loans for irresponsible lending


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 770 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

Can i ask some advice

 

I started on DMP with stepchange for all my current loans and credit cards.

 

I was behind with my loans to Natwest who suggested that I can only offer repayment plan if I speak to stepchange or payplan and they will go with their assessment.

 

I was upto date with other loans and credit card except with my bamboo loan and 118118 loan and drafty.

 

Can i file a complain of irresponsible lending to drafty and 118118?

 

Also do I have to request for CCA and all this loans are current.

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes you can 

 

 

what are the dates of take out for all the other debt please?

and are all your debts still with the original creditors?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you had outstanding credit, lots of defaults , missed payments on other credit on your credit file, then you are almost guaranteed to succeed with most PDL companies on an IRL complaint, but only if they still exist...many have already have gone bust due to mass of complaints...:pound:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ofcourse.

original creditors dont do court anyway!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope moorgate don't buy debts, who are their stated client?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont buy debts either.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Irl still goes to the oc regardless to sale or not.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

open

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just want to ask advise I made a complaint for an unaffordable loan with bamboo and they had their final response and offer a settlement. Should I accept the offer.

 

Their offer is the same amount as my remaining balance to be paid.

 

here are my loan details

Loan Reference: .............                                                                                                                  .......

Agreement Date: 14/05/2019                                                                                                          25/10/2019

Loan Advance: £2,000.00                                                                                                                 £629.09

Settlement Amount (to be used to clear any existing Bamboo loan): N/A                              £1,781.38

Interest Amount: £1,483.68                                                                                                             £1,305.60

Total Amount Payable: £3,483.68                                                                                                   £3,716.07

Repayment Term: 24 months                                                                                                          18 months

Monthly Repayment: £145.15                                                                                                          £206.45 

Total Repaid by Customer: £725.75                                                                                                 £2,529.76

Status of Loan: Closed                                                                                                                     Open with TBI

 

Summary from their final response

 

In summary, Bamboo believes it made a fair lending decision in approving your loans after carefully considering your circumstances and affordability and we are therefore unable to uphold your complaint.

 

At the time of your applications, we could only rely on the income, expense, and credit information available to us from third party resources such as TransUnion and the information provided by you. We believe that by providing you with a detailed response to the points you have raised in your complaint, we have demonstrated that each loan was sustainably affordable for you without placing you into financial hardship and that we undertook appropriate and proportionate checks before we agreed to lend to you.

 

We are however surprised and disappointed to hear that you are unhappy with Bamboo agreeing to lend to you and whilst we are happy that we acted appropriately, there is considerable cost to administering complaints such as this.

 

We are therefore prepared to make a goodwill offer with the intention of helping you repay the outstanding loan faster than scheduled.

 

The offer, which is made in in full and final settlement of this complaint in relation to Bamboo loans referenced .... and ...., is to reduce your balance by £1,305.60. This is equivalent to all of the interest on the (current) loan.

 

If you are happy to accept this offer then please confirm your acceptance by replying to this email, we will then ask TBI Financial Services Ltd to update your account accordingly.

 

If you do not currently have a payment plan in place with TBI Financial Services Ltd, then please can we ask that you contact them on 01189 313 800 to discuss.

 

However, if you would like to discuss anything further, please reply to this email at [email protected] or alternatively call us on 02382 140616. We hope that you fully understand the outcome achieved.

 

You have the right to refer your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service free of charge, but you must do so within six months of the date of this letter. If you do not refer your complaint in time, the Ombudsman will not have our permission to consider your complaint and so will only be able to do so in very limited circumstances. For example, if the Ombudsman believes that the delay was as a result of exceptional circumstances.

 

For further details about the Financial Ombudsman Service please visit their website at www.financialombudsman.org.uk/publications/consumer-leaflet.htm. Should you wish us to send you a leaflet with more detail about the service they offer, we would be happy to send you one in the post at your request. We also enclose a copy of our Complaints procedure.

 

Please note our offer will be withdrawn if not accepted within eight weeks, or earlier in the event of a referral to the Financial Ombudsman Service. If you require more time to consider this offer, then please contact us to request an extension.

 

Thanks in advance for any advise

Link to post
Share on other sites

go to the fos.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what do you mean by reversed?

 

have BB have not taken into account all the previous loans ?

 

17 hours ago, Koyem said:

Their offer is the same amount as my remaining balance to be paid.

 

so they've not helped any??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It cant hurt you.

 

They cant 'reverse anything '

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which ofcourse they have no way of knowing you are seeing.

block and bounce all emails...report texts as spam to 7726

writing only

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...