Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, the vehicle went to Audi Chingford on Thursday 13th May. I did state beforehand that I only wanted a diagnostic. The technician out of courtesy opened the drain letting huge deposits of water escape the seals. Video evidence was provided via AUDI cam. The link for the audi cam has been forwarded to BMW and Motonovo. I spoke to branch manager explained the situation and he stated he would sent me an email outlining the issue. Audi state this is not really an issue and more of a design flaw. However, the seals still have water ingress. I purchased the vehicle with £0 deposit on a 60 months HP plan for £520.00. The vehicle total was £21000. I did not go for any extended warranty. I live almost 70 miles away from the aftersales centre in Peterborough. I have previously uploaded the document I forwarded to BMW however it was in word format. I have had to buy a new tyre almost three days after purchasing vehicle. BMW still have not compensated me for the v62 cost as they said they would. 
    • I would suggest that you stop trying to rely on legal theory – as you understand it. Firstly, because we are dealing with practical/pragmatic situations and at a low value level where these arguments tend not to work. Secondly, because you clearly have misunderstood the assessment of quantum where there are breaches of obligations. The formula that you have cited above is the method of loss calculation in torts. In contract it is entirely different. The law of obligations generally attempts to remedy the breach. This means that in tort, damages seek to put you into the position you would have been in had the breach not occurred. In other words it returns you to your starting position – point zero. Contract damages attend put you into the position that you would have been had the breach not occurred but this is not your starting position, contract damages assume that the agreement in dispute had actually been carried out. This puts you into your final position. You sold an item for £XXX. Your expectation was that you your item would be correctly delivered and that you would be the beneficiary of £XXX. Your expectation loss is the amount that you sold the item for and that is all you are entitled to recover. If you want, you can try to sue for the larger sum – and we will help you. But if they ask for evidence of the value of the item as it was sold then I can almost guarantee that either you will be obliged to settle for the lesser sum – or else a judge will give you judgement but for the lesser sum. This will put you to the position that you would have been had there been no breach of contract. I understand from you now that when you dispatch the item you declared the retail cost to you and not your expected benefit of £XXX. To claim for the retail value in the circumstances would offend the rules relating to betterment. If you want to do it then we will help you – but don't be surprised if you take a tumble.  
    • I was caught speeding 3 times in the same week, on the same road. All times were 8-12mph higher than the limit. I was offered the course for the first offense and I now need to accept the other 2 offenses. I just want to be ready for what might come. Will I get the £100 fine and 3 points for each of them or do I face something more severe?  These are my only offenses in 8 years of driving.
    • I'll get my letter drafted this evening. Its an item I sold, which I'm also concerned about, as whilst I don't have my original purchase receipt (the best I have is my credit card statement showing a purchase from Car Audio Centre), I do unfortunately have the eBay listing where I sold it for much less. But as I said before this is now a question of compensation: true compensation would seek to put me back into the position I was in before the loss ie: that title would remain with me until my buyer has accepted this, and so compensation should be that which would be needed to replace the lost item. But in the world of instant electronic payment, it could be argued that as I had already been paid, the title to the goods had already transferred, and I was required to refund the buyer after the loss. And so, despite my declared value being the retail price - that which is needed to return me to my pre-sales position, the compensatory value should be the value I sold it for, which being a second-hand item from a private seller is lower. I still believe that I should be claiming for the item's full value, rather than how much I sold it for, as this is the same for insurance: we don't insure the value we paid, but rather the value of the item to put us back into the position we would be in if we ever needed to claim. Its for the loss adjuster to argue the toss
    • amusing that 'bad economic judgement on behalf of prior party ISN'T a major reason to wingers to move to deform yet immigration is, where record levels of such has been driven by the right wings terrible brexit and the later incompetent dog whistle 'proposals largely driven to whistle to the right wingnuts Just seems to confirm the are clueless numpties 'wetting their own shoes   Has farage bought a property in Clacton yet?   yet concern for the NHS is listed as a major issue even by those saying they are moving to deform  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Backdoor Capquest CCJ - old CAT debt - 3 years after CCA Request not fulfilled ***Set a Side /Consent***


soldat
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 800 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Merged witness and draft defence, deleting some paragraphs.. still too long?

 

1. I understand that the Claimant obtained a Default Judgment against me as the Defendant on 10 November 2021. However, the claim had not been served at my current address. Therefore, I was not aware of the County Court Judgment until I received a notification that it had been entered on my credit report.

 

2. On learning of the County Court Judgement on 15 November 2021, I immediately contacted County Court Business Centre to find out details of the Default Judgment. It was only at this point that I discovered that Capquest Investments Limited was the Claimant and that the judgment was regarding monies owed on an alleged credit agreement. On 17 November I received a copy of the judgment from the County Court Business Centre by Email.

 

3. I now know that the judgment was served at an old address (xxx). However, I moved to a new address on 8 January 2021 with my tenancy at the old address ending 5 February 2021. In support of this I can provide confirmation of two (2) Council Tax bills for my current address (xx) and previous address. See [EVIDENCE A and B]

 

4. On 12 September 2018, the Claimant wrote to the Defendant clearly stating that following a request from the Defendant for a copy of the signed Consumer Credit Agreement with the original creditor, that one did not exist. I had no reason to believe this situation has changed to date and, the Claimant having already written to my new address reporting of default sums notice under the the Consumer Credit Act 1974 did, purposefully, use an old address to gain a Default Judgement. See [EVIDENCE C]

 

5. I suggest the Claimant did not make reasonable enquiries as to my current address before pursuing the court order especially considering they had good reason to believe they did not hold my current contact details. As stated in the Civil Procedure Rules CPR 6.9(3) where a Claimant has reason to believe that the address of the Defendant referred is an address at which the Defendant no longer resides or carries on business, the Claimant must take reasonable steps to ascertain the address of the Defendant’s current residence or place of business. At the time of the County Court Judgment, my credit file showed my current address so I was there to be found by a simple trace. See [EVIDENCE D].

 

6. The Claimant sent a letter dated 27 October 2021 to my current address which I received on 9 November 2021. This equates to only twelve (12) working days between the Claimant filing the claim and producing this letter. I must question why the Claimant would use two different addresses in such a short space of time if there was any doubt I no longer resided at the address they had on record. See [EVIDENCE E].

 

7. On the basis provided above I would suggest that the Claimant did not fulfil their duty to use the Defendant’s current address when bringing the claim.

 

8. Considering the above, I as the Defendant was unable to defend this claim properly. I thus believe that the Default Judgement against me was issued incorrectly and thus should be set aside.

 

9. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

10. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have had an agreement in the past with Shop Direct Finance Company Limited but I do not recognise the account number referred to by the Claimant. 

 

11. Paragraph 2 is noted but not admitted. The Claimant would not be aware of any alleged breach or in a position to plead such fact as an assignee as the Defendant did not enter into any agreement with the Claimant and is therefore put to strict proof to verify the alleged statement of its particulars.

 

12. Paragraph 3 is denied. I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served.

Edited by dx100uk
formatting
Link to post
Share on other sites

Too long its now back to a witness statement.....1=3 should suffice also without reading all your topic...and before you go to the expense of this application , you did inform Capquest  of your change of address before they issued the claim ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've not heard from Capquest since they acknowledged they had no cca, so I must have forgotten all about them. I suppose if I had, they wouldn't have tried backdoor ccj.

 

My defence is they deliberately gained the default knowing I had moved given they sent default of sums to my current address only 12 working days after filing the claim.

 

and like dx said, I had no reason to believe I had to protect myself against the ccj given they have no cca. Which is pretty much what my witness statement says.

 

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

 they sent default of sums to my current address only 12 working days after filing the claim.

Fine so they were aware of your current address.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm still a bit confused as to what I'm sending off.

 

I've filled in the N244 following dx's instructions.

 

Box 3. I've put: "The Defendant in these proceedings respectfully requests that the Court make an order to set aside the judgment pursuant to CPR 13.2 & 3(2).

 

The claim form was not delivered to my address. I only became aware of the judgment after I checked my credit file. I believe I have a real defence against the claim."

 

or should I put (as my reason): "The Claimant deliberately filed the claim to an old address in order to win a judgment by default."

 

I've ticked Draft Order attached as per Andy's suggestion.

 

Which I have:

 

1. The judgment be set aside pursuant to CPR 13.2 & 3(2).

2. The Claimant pays the Defendant’s costs of this application to the sum of £275.

3. The Claimant has permission to file and serve a reply if so required.

 

4. All enforcement be put on hold pending the outcome of the application.


I thought my witness statement has all the information as to why it should be set aside, so why do I not send this with the application if there's a ticky box for it?#

 

Help!

 

 

Edited by dx100uk
Format only
Link to post
Share on other sites

You dont file a witness statement with an n244 application, you file a sep statement of defence ( if you like to call it that)

 

A ws with exhibits is for after you win the set aside and if a sep hearing is latterly ordered regarding the actual initial claim.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm struggling with the wording of my statement then.

 

So far I got:

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. ← do i need this?

The Claimant wrote to the Defendant in August 2018 admitting they were unable to produce a copy of the Credit Agreement which they noted in paragraph 1 of their particulars of claim, and therefore the account they had on record was unenforceable, after the Defendant requested a copy.

I have reason to believe the Claimant would only file a claim if the Defendant was unable to respond in order to win the judgment by default. The Claimant filed a claim using the Defendant’s previous address, and the Defendant was only made aware of the judgment after checking their credit file.

The Claimant sent a letter dated 27 October 2021 to the Defendant’s current address only twelve (12) days after filing the claim to Defendant’s previous address therefore showing they were aware the Defendant had changed address.

 

Any tips?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea drop the 1st bit.

 

I would specifically mention what the letter was and a legal requirement under the consumer credit act 1974.

 

I think you had this in before but have left it out now. It brings weight to your claim.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 05/12/2021 at 17:00, soldat said:

understand that the Claimant obtained a Default Judgment against me as the Defendant on 10 November 2021. However, the claim had not been served at my current address. Therefore, I was not aware of the County Court Judgment until I received a notification that it had been entered on my credit report.

 

2. On learning of the County Court Judgement on 15 November 2021, I immediately contacted County Court Business Centre to find out details of the Default Judgment. It was only at this point that I discovered that Capquest Investments Limited was the Claimant and that the judgment was regarding monies owed on an alleged credit agreement. On 17 November I received a copy of the judgment from the County Court Business Centre by Email.

 

3. I now know that the judgment was served at an old address (xxx). However, I moved to a new address on 8 January 2021 with my tenancy at the old address ending 5 February 2021. In support of this I can provide confirmation of two (2) Council Tax bills for my current address (xx) and previous address. See [EVIDENCE A and B]

 

 

As andy pointed too ....make a 4 to the above about the default sums notice

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, dx100uk said:

You dont file a witness statement with an n244 application, you file a sep statement of defence ( if you like to call it that)

 

A ws with exhibits is for after you win the set aside and if a sep hearing is latterly ordered regarding the actual initial claim.

 

Dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just checking. So the only thing I send is the N244?

 

Revised statement (this goes in box. 10?):

 

1. I understand the Claimant obtained a judgment against me as the Defendant on 10 November 2021. However, no claim was served at my current address. Therefore, I was not aware of any judgment until I checked my credit file online.

2. On learning of the judgment on 15 November 2021, I immediately contacted the County Court Business Centre to find out the details. It was only then I discovered that Capquest Investments Limited was the Claimant and that the judgment was regarding monies owed on an alleged credit agreement. On 17 November I received a copy of the judgment from the County Court Business Centre via Email.

3. I now know that the judgment was served at a previous address (Do not put your address -dx))  However, I moved to a new address on 8 January 2021 with my tenancy at the old address ending 5 February 2021. My new address was added to my credit file in February 2021, and entered into the Electoral Roll in May 2021.

4. The Claimant sent a letter dated 27 October 2021 to the Defendant’s current address reporting of a default sums notice under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, only twelve (12) days after filing the claim to Defendant’s previous address therefore demonstrating they were aware the Defendant had changed address, and purposefully used my previous address to gain a judgement by default.

5. On 12 September 2018, the Claimant wrote to the Defendant stating that following a request from the Defendant for a copy of the signed Consumer Credit Agreement with the original creditor, that one did not exist. I had no reason to believe this situation has changed to date and therefore had no reason to protect myself against a default judgment.

 

 

Edited by dx100uk
removed address
Link to post
Share on other sites

leave the old N244 ALONE :frusty:

 

this is a SEPARATE DEFENCE STATEMENT to accompany it.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Haha. Sorry. I'm still unsure what i'm submitting. I've completed the N244 as per your instructions. Done

 

The above is the statement or draft defence? I'll put that on separate sheet.


Is it sufficient what I wrote in my previous post?

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 28/11/2021 at 18:35, dx100uk said:

on your ws your 4. remove all, write that the claimant on xxx date wrote to the defendant clearly stating that following a request from the defendant for a copy of the signed agreement with the original creditor, that the claimant replied dated xxxx that one did not exist (exhibit xxx) and you had no reason to believe this situation has changed to date and that the claimant having already written to your new address several times, including required reporting of default sums notice under the the Consumer Credit Act 1974 did, purposefully, use an only address to gain a default judgement.

N244

 

On page one of the N244, fill out the Court details and Claim no. The Claimant’s and your details in the top right-hand box and the date (include Claimant’s sols ref if you know them).
 Leave Warrant no. blank (not applicable to your application).

 In para 1 – put your full name in Caps.
 In para 2 – tick Defendant box.

 In para 3 - What order are you asking the court to make and why?, state the following:

 1. The Defendant in these proceedings respectfully requests that the Court make an order to set a side judgment pursuant to CPR 13.2 & 3(2).
 [your reason to set aside.]

 (You can go into further detail at box 10)

 In para 4 – tick yes ( attach Draft Order)

 In para 5 – tick with a hearing box

 In para 6 – leave blank

 In para 7 – leave blank

 In para 8 – put District Judge

 In para 9 – put sols

 In para 9a -put sols Address


 Then fill out the Statement of Truth – sign & date.

 In para 11 – your signature & date.

 Then fill out your full address details & Phone & Fax & E-mail details –(if applicable).

 Serve a copy on the claimants solicitor and retain a hard copy for your file
 

 

it can go into box 10 yes

head it back ground information.

 

If its too big to fit in box 10 , then it becomes a sep sheet and in box 10 state see separate defence statement attached.

make sure you put your details on it so if it gets detached by someone, they know its yours.  also dont forget to do the statement of truth at its end and sign it, like the end of the n244.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tnx to @andyorch for updating the above, the guide was from a very old post of yours i'd nicked years ago.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi guys

 

We've finally received a court date. We have to submit a telephone number for a one hour slot that's been allocated.

 

They haven't told us anything else. Do we need to provide defence etc. or does that come later? No idea what to expect.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites


you included a statement with your N244 did you not?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You ideally should be reading up between stages.

 

here is a loan n244 thread but the process is the same..

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/430894-erudiodrydens-slc-loan-ccj-advice-please-set-a-side-claim-proceeding/#comments

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much for that dx.

 

We've just received a letter from drydens saying they have reviewed our application, and the claimant has taken the decision to consent to the Judgment being set-aside, and further, will discontinue their claim.

 

However, as legal proceedings have commenced, this needs to be done by way of a Consent Order and sent to the court.

 

They've included a consent order to sign and return.

 

However, it doesn't mention paying my costs for my N244.


On the Order it says:

 

1. Judgment obtained on 10 nov 2021 be set-aside and registration removed.

2. The Claimant's Claim to be discontinued, and

3. There be no Order as to costs.

 

How do I proceed, or shall I thank my lucky stars they have agreed to set it a-side?

 

Thanks again

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ask them about your £275 costs for the fee as its very unfair they forced you to spend this fee money when they have already been directly contacted before? the N244 application + fee to agree consent.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx.

 

Is this ok to send off?
 

I write with reference to your recent correspondence dated 1 March 2022 informing me that your client has consented to the Judgment against me being set-aside, and furthermore, their decision to discontinue their claim.

 

However, I’m unsatisfied with the Consent Order you attached with regards to item 3) There be no Order as to costs. It is unfair I have had to pay costs of £275 to file an application notice for a Judgment I should never have received. I therefore politely request your client agrees to paying my costs on an updated Consent Order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, they've agreed and sent a new consent order to sign and return.

 

point 3) has been revised to:

The Claimant do pay the sum of £275.00 to the Defendant in respect of her application fee within 14 days of the date of the sealed Order.

 

OK to sign and return?

 

I assume we don't have to pay any of their fees that they sent in the notice of sums etc.

 

It seems strange they've agreed to all this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...