Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
    • Hungary is attempting to be a world power in manufacturing electric vehicle batteries, despite locals' reservations.View the full article
    • You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though.     A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees.   https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

First Direct DN's issued for Card and Loan By HSBC - want to avoid Default if Poss.


Jay51728
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1036 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Completely new to the site, so forgive me if these queries have been answered.

 

Unfortunately I've been dealt a final Demand letter for X amounts owed for my loan and credit card. Due to Covid repayments have been tough.

 

First Direct want the full amount by the given date, otherwise default would be issued (28 days since the notice was handed 09/06) and debt would be passed onto HSBC repayments.

 

The chap I spoke to wasn't much help, I attempted to organise a repayment plan but unfortunately fell on deaf ears.

 

I want to know if there are any solutions to combat this final demand that's due on 27/06 and avoid default.

 

Any advice or help is much appreciated.

 

Thank you. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to First Direct DN's issued for Card and Loan By HSBC - want to avoid Default if Poss.

sadly it might be better to allow it to happen, the quicker the defaults are registered the quicker (6yrs) the whole accounts vanish from you file.

you are probably not going to recover from things in the long term anyway and more problems will arise.

 

it's still with the original creditor so no worries about court or anything as OC's don't do court.

getting an arrangement in place won't stop the DN's being registered and it's better to do things by writing only.

 

these can't be your only debts, so have a look at our pro-rata letters in the debt collection section of library 

and deal with all your issues with potential debt now.

 

take control don't be controlled...it's YOUR money.

 

have you other debts?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I don't have any debts in similar situations, I've dealt with other matters.

 

Shame really, as I was hoping to come to some sort of repayment plan. The customer service was poor from FD, but will discuss it with HSBC repayment team to try and gain more information.

 

I'll be 30 when the 6 years are up, no idea what my credit history will be like in terms of applying for mortgage etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats HSBC for you, though i would have expected quite a few previous letters to simply launch into DN time straight off......

how long have you had these accounts?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 - 6 months, but I've been in-between jobs & ill.

 

I did try to communicate once before but didn't provide a structure or plan.

Maybe I can discuss it with HSBC repayments if I'm able to pay it off within the 28 days but unsure.

 

The adviser was really awful in explaining the procedures.

There was quite a bit of contradiction between the letters & what they said.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i asked when you opened the accounts...

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

god no wonder they are not happy

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well lets hope they don't pull their old stunt of merging everything into a 'managed loan' and dumping that as a grant OD balance like they used too.

 

given that these lines of credit are so recent i don't think you've much chance of avoiding defaults, though i hope they gave you covid relief etc, have you been paying what you can PCM to date or simply ignored paying anything?

 

they shouldn't be jumping to wanting the full balance in a Default notice without having gone through many other warning 1st.

 

even with defaults mortgage applications direct to prime lenders in the current climate are not getting refused with a good deposit behind you.

 

i hope you didnt take out the loan to pay off old debts as your comment of 'dealt with other matters' concerning debt concerns me .

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I was planning to use the loan for house improvements, but due to my partner shielding due to Covid and medical issues I had to use it for other expenses to get by. I kept up for a few months then failed to deal with it. I've got no other defaults.

 

I will send a complaint though as I contacted previously and they failed to provide adequate advice. Even now, the adviser was unsure about the procedures. I did offer to pay either the CC or loan off but fell on deaf ears. I requested additional few days as the sum due was on a weekend but apparently automatically set.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...