Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Hermes damaged my parcel and disposed of it


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1049 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please will you post up documents in PDF format.

You need to post up the claim form as well.

Before a general comment on the situation – which we can only see when you have shown us the claim documents, I'm afraid that although it seems unfair, apply the judgement doesn't automatically grant it. They can still sneak in with their defence before your application for judgement is actually processed.

Hermes always leave things to the last moment and this is not the first time it has happened. I'm afraid although it's disappointing it seems unfair, if they managed to put in their defence before your application for a judgement was processed then their defence will have priority.

Please post up the relevant documents

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are quite a few things to say about this. Some of them you aren't going to like.

However, first of all you say that you asked them for evidence of the damage. Did you do this in writing? Did they decline in writing? Do you have copies of this writing?

Secondly, you declared it as £650 value and am afraid that limits the value of your claim. I'm not sure that you have read around the Hermes toys on this sub- forum but when you do start reading around you will discover that when you enter into a contract, you create expectations on either side. They create an expectation that they will deliver your parcel. You create an expectation in them that they are carrying a risk of £650. If the contract goes wrong then those are the liabilities.

When you read around the stories on this sub- forum, you will understand what we have to say about the insurance requirement and why it is unfair.

Next, they have taken your property and destroyed it without any reference to you. In other words they have acted as if they were the owners of the property – and in law they have effectively taken over ownership. This is known as the – tort of conversion – and it is contrary to the Torts (Wrongful Interference with Goods) Act 1977 and you could claim for their tort of conversion and you could claim discretionary damages of probably £100 or maybe £150.
You haven't done this and if you wanted to add this head of damage to your claim then I'm afraid that it would properly cost you over £200 to make the application notice in order to amend your claim and you would not get this money back because it was your fault that you hadn't put it in the first place.

This is a real shame, because we have had several instances of Hermes apparently damaging items and then simply destroyed them – or saying that they have destroyed them – without any permission, authority and without providing any evidence. We have had one claim go through so far for a Gucci bag which apparently was destroyed. The value was £650 and we added £100 on top for the conversion and Hermes paid out.

There are other cases which I think are going through at the moment involving the tort of conversion.

The unfortunate thing is that I see that you have been registered with this since March. It's a shame you didn't come here earlier because I can imagine that you issued your claim after you registered here when you knew that we existed and that we would help you. We would have urge you to read the Hermes stories and you would have discovered about the tort of conversion although we would have prompted you on this issue.

I'm not sure why you decided to register and then at least not read around the stories to understand the principles involved – and then even ask us to help you begin your claim, draft your documents et cetera.

On the basis that you probably won't want to spend the money adding a claim for conversion, the defence document which you received is absolutely their standard defence document. The next stage is that you will receive the directions questionnaire and they will probably indicate that they are happy go to mediation – and you should agree this.

Let us know when you get the directions questionnaire and in the meantime I strongly suggest that you read around the Hermes stories on this sub- forum so you understand how it all works, what the arguments are, in particular the attitude to their insurance requirement and also the mediation journey.

There are several excellent summaries of people's mediation experience here and you should pay good attention to them.

Keep us updated

Also, when we ask you to post up documents in PDF format – we really do mean that and it includes the claim form/particulars of claim which you have decided to type up. We prefer to receive in PDF format.

We provide free help but we would like people to cooperate with us and make it as easy as possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you organise this delivery directly with Hermes or did you use an intermediary such as Packlink?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you made the booking directly through Hermes without using an eBay mechanism then it will be you who have been responsible for the declaration of value. That's the way I understand it. Had the delivery been organised through eBay then they would automatically have adopted the sale price of the item

They seem to be very clear on the defence that you declared only £650. I think it will be a good idea to write to them and ask them for evidence of the declaration.

It's a shame that you haven't kept copies or screenshots of your delivery arrangements because it was made things much easier.

I'm afraid that it is too late to claim for a Conversion without making a formal application to the court to modify your claim.

This would have allowed you to add a figure of about £100 or £150 on top of the value of your item. Damages for conversion aren't intended to represent the value of the item. Damages for conversion are intended to compensate you for the insult of having your ownership interfered with. It's a kind of trespass to property.

I'm not sure that there is much else to say at the moment. Let us know when you get your directions questionnaire but it's essential that you start reading the material that we have on this forum. It's all there. It's all free. It's just going to take some time

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

You should fill out the DQ and indicate that you are prepared to accept mediation.

Read the Hermes stories so that you have a complete understanding of how it goes

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. You are litigant in person so it is your name and address

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...