Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Screwfix,Trade UK/Shoosmiths chasing Business a/c but no? Personal Guarantee


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1228 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi- have a lot of experience in this currently , my first point is you signed on behalf of a company , - I shall dig out the relevant ‘elpin’ case law , which is why that is not a personal signature - 

 

and as such does not meet the s4 statute of frauds 1677 meaning it is not a guarantee 

 

that must be in writing and signed (in a personal capacity 

 

If I was in your shoes (although unless you have other evidence ) I would not be paying this , and I think the solicitor is trying it on 

 

give me 10 minutes and I’ll get the relevant case law - I do not recognise this as a personal guarantee , in my unqualified opinion 

 

 

Elpis Maritime Co . Limited v Marti Chartering co.inc (1992) 1.A.C.21 

 

The issue was whether a guarantor had signed as a charter party not in his personal capacity but ‘on behalf of’ a company had any bearing on the enforceability of the guarantee under s4 of the statute of frauds 1677.

 

House of Lords held that if a guarantor had signed solely in his capacity as an agent of the company , then he was not party to the charter party at all , and a prior oral agreement (I’m assuming there is no proof of a prior oral agreement) between the parties had not been subsumed in the relevant clause of the charter party, therefor no written or signed agreement of the guarantee under s4 .

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

i agree with dx100uk,

 

i this still general contact, or have you received a letter before action or pre action protocol pack? 

if you have received a pack i would be responding to it in writing etc for a paper trail.-always respond in writing

 

£3500 small claims, so little cost to defend, and there are , apart from the most useful defence i gave you, others like the Etridge priciples etc- 

 

but for me its a cut and dry elpis case, and i feel unless they have any other evidence, i would simply write back, something along the lines of 

 

-ive sought legal advice

- this does not constitute a guarantee under 'Elpis' statute of frauds etc and explain why

-ask them under what legislation are they relying on that would make this a personal guarantee, as it does not meet the criteria under s4 f the statute of frauds?

 

at this point i would still be writing in a friendly way, politely pointing out its failings in claim and inviting them to explain or demonstrate why you are not correct in your understanding?

 

you must make all decisions that suit your circumstances, whether you want to negotiate , play hard ball etc 

everyone is different

 

and dont under estimate how aggressive they can get, dont get bullied, when their case is weak or unenforceable, they will go strong to beat you down , as its their only really successful way of getting any money out of you.

 

im finding alot of creditors using court claims, merely as a form of debt recovery strong arming, when they dont actually have much success of winning for various reasons.

 

courts are for genuine, enforecable claims-, which can be confirmed , discovered in the pre action stages, not for people to abuse court systems to make people pay, hoping a court letter will scare them (they dont actually intend on making it to court)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would imagine , that have run out of avenues to Chase other people and are now , Extending  demands to you ,  

 

If it was me , I would be standing my ground and sending the letter informing them , that there is no personal guarantee , and with out proper evidence of such (which has currently not been provided in there documents/unless there are others we haven’t seen  )  , to cease and desist collection activity 

 

but it’s All about what you are comfortable With , I wouldn’t say that letter is too demanding - they want contact and a payment plan, ccj talk mere threats right now , to scare you 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Screwfix,Trade UK/Shoosmiths chasing Business a/c but no? Personal Guarantee

I have to agree with dx100 - 

 

the info I gave you from one of my cases was from a barrister - who helped me - there is no personal guarantee where you sign on behalf of a company , and not in a personal capacity 

 

I gave up approaching solicitors for general information a long time ago - 

 

they are just picking on the easiest person to give in , if the company is still trading, even though in difficulty , they could pay or come to an arrangement to pay , how do you know , they are not paying or in an arrangement 

 

not only do they have to prove personal guarantee , they have to prove amount owing is genuine etc have you had a statement of account and copies of invoices to prove what the asked of you - 

 

as you said earlier 
 

In August 2019 the company defaulted on their account and in November 2020 the Trade UK solicitor chased me for the payment 

 

they tried the company for a year , then thought They would have a go at you - 

 

if they knew there was a valid personal guarantee , trust me , you would have been contacted September 2019 not one whole year later - they are trying it on 

 

I would bet money on a very well written response  with case law - would end further communications from them , they  know you are flustered and are playing on your fears 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...