Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

VCS 2*windscreen PCN's Claimform - Monty Hind Car Park Nottingham NG7 2LX, Leengate Staff and Visitor Car Park Nottingham NG72LX


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1206 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

 

Today I was sent two letters to my parent's house from dcbl both asking for £160. 

 

This used to be my address but I have moved away since.

My mum opens my post and sends me photos of the enclosed via Whatsapp.

 

This may or may not be in regards to parking offences dating back to 2015-2017- they have sent me no information on the matter at all, no photo of my car, no information about location, reg plate etc - they might have sent me these 3-4 years back but obviously I cannot recall much from then. 

 

I paid one of these last month thinking that this would stop.

I have a feeling that because they are aware that I have paid these charges before, they maybe targeting me as they feel I will just cough up. 

 

I don't want this amounting to a CCJ. 

 

I would appreciate some advice in regards to responding to these letters.

 

Thank you.

 

 

DCBL letter 1-10-20 (£160).pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply Dave. 

 

The reason why I am so concerned about CCJs is that I have been sanctioned with two in 2015 and 16.

This happened because on university campus, I got a parking ticket whilst my car was stuck in snow.

 

after doing some research on the net,

I ignored all the letters that came through the post and you could even see the steadily increasing charge amount.

I ignored the CCJ that came through not realising what it can do to ones CR. 

 

Since then I have paid everything off - heck, I even gave £80-90 to Harlands

 

What I am saying is, I rather respond in some way than ignore everything with the same outcome as above. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a look at the PCN. I looks like a genuine ticket I got from where I worked. 

 

On the VCS website it says the charge amount is £100, but when I go to pay, it doesn't let me as of course its been passed on. 

 

How do you guys think I should play this?

 

Also, I have learnt from my mistakes. Back then, I thought the CCJ was another scare tactic. 

 

Thank you.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to DCBL chasing VCS PCN

Thanks once again for the reply and apologies for being inconsistent. 

 

To answer the above questions:

 

- I will keep the address the same given that I am in the process of moving house. I am happy with my mum forwarding me the post. 

 

- I received TWO separate letters from DCBL yesterday. They are identical apart from the DCBL reference number and VCS reference number. 

 

- In regards to the parking PCN. I don't physically have this but I know it was left on the window of the car. 

 

 

I take your point not to pay blindly. I will fill out the info template during my break.

 

Thank you. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

'Who ever pays PPC's ???'

 

This is the attitude I once had. 

 

I want to respond to these accordingly to see where I stand. 

 

dx100uk:

 

I understand the take home message not to pay blindly and I have taken notice of your signature. 

 

Thanks. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Dave,

 

So I will get a SAR request to them by post with proof of postage.

 

I have just read the following from MSE:

 

 'and a list of all PCNs outstanding against you and/or this VRN, and remind them that any claim must be for all PCNs, not several separate claims' - this is again relating to requesting SAR

 

So the plan of action it to SAR, find out what information that have on me and then I will post on here for some feedback. 

 

Anything to add?

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't say move. When COVID wasn't on a killing spree, I went back to this address on a two weekly/ monthly basis.

 

I still consider this my base however.

I live elsewhere in rented accommodation hence why I am in the process of buying/ moving house.

 

Why do you ask? 

 

'As seen on TV. Can't pay, we'll take it away' Is that what you mean? lol 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Appreciate that fella. 

 

Yes, I assure it gets to me as a matter of urgency.

 

Just been to the post office and SAR sent first class to VCS with proof of postage. 

 

Thanks. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi, 

 

An update:

 

 I have received the SAR.

 

They have 4 separate PCNs on record under my name. 

 

1) Excel Parking - 19/12/2016, XLxxxx9844, £100

2) VCS -  21/04/2017, VCSxxx4562, £100 - Matching

3) VCS - 26/04/2017, VCSxxx4950, £100

4) VCS - 27/04/2017, VCSxxx6161, £100 - Matching 

 

I have put matching as these corresponds to BW legal invoices I last recieved.

 

What information do you require?

 

Thanks.

Edited by unclebulgaria67
Did not need whole numbers. Edited to redact for confidentiality.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Date of issue: 4th January 2021

 

Name of the Claimant : Vehicle Control Services Limited

 

Claimants Solicitors: Yasmin Mia

 

What is the claim for 

 

1. The Defendant (D) is indebted to the claimant (C) for the Parking Charges (s) issues to the vehicle XXXXX at the Monty Hind Car Park Nottingham NG7 2LX, Leengate Staff and Visitor Car Park Nottingham 

 

2. The PCN details are 21/04/2017 VCSXXXX562, 27/04/2017 VCSXXXX161.

 

3. The PCN (s) was issued on private land owned or managed by C. The vehicle was parked in breach of the Terms of Cs signs (the contract), thus incurring the PCN(s).

 

4. The driver agreed to pay within 28 days but did not.  D is liable as the driver or keeper. Despite requests, the PCN(s) is outstanding. The contract entitles C to damages. 

 

AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS 

1. £320 being the total of the PCN(s) and damages.

2. Interest at a rate of 8% per annum pursuant to s.69of the County Courts Act 1984 from the date hereof at a daily rate of £0.07 until judgement or sooner payment

3. Costs and court fees.  

 

What is the value of the claim? £499.56

 

Amount Claimed £414.56

court fees £35

legal rep fees £50

Total Amount £499.56

 

 

Guys, 

 

The claim from came  through today. 

 

To be absolutely honest, I don't really have a defence as I parked there and had no intention of paying. 

 

Should I pay it off in full or no. 

 

I normally would just pay it off but as emphasised before by dx100uk, not to pay blindly. 

 

What do you think?

Edited by ats101
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to VCS 2*PCN's Claimform - Monty Hind Car Park Nottingham NG7 2LX, Leengate Staff and Visitor Car Park Nottingham NG72LX

Doing some forward thinking,

 

If I submit a defence, it means that I will have to defend myself in court. 

 

The issue I have is that I work in the Isle of man and I'm on the front line in healthcare here. It would be very difficult to come to mainland UK, travel back to IOM and have to isolate for 14 days. 

 

Can I get a waiver?

 

Also there is no address for the solicitor. Who should I address the PPC to?

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So this was a private car park on/near hospital grounds. I parked there without purchasing a pay and display ticket. Therefore, when I returned to my car after work, there was a PCN on the window. 

 

VCN want to do me because I didn't purchase a ticket and parked in a space governed by them. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cannot remember or tell from the photos. I will have a look on g maps.

 

I cant say for sure, but I think it maybe the same car park twice

 

Ok so next, I will complete the CPR and send it to VCS for the attention of name simon's solicitor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to VCS 2*windscreen PCN's Claimform - Monty Hind Car Park Nottingham NG7 2LX, Leengate Staff and Visitor Car Park Nottingham NG72LX

dx100uk: 

 

I can assure you that I haven't received a pack. 1st set of letters received were two speculative invoices. On the front of these were the offence details and references, on the reverse was payment information. One a4 letter in one envelope and another a4 letter in the other envelope - no pack.

 

This follows the same format for the second set of letters - no pack as such. 

 

 

Dave: This would not be possible at the moment. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...