Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

StepChange £150PCM DMP - Been Paying for 15yrs - all Old debts/scared and out of my depth


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1301 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

god these organisations should have their staff taken outside and...

 

sorry but it really annoys me how these companies that are supposed to help people typically end up harming them for the rest of their lives . you could of had a nice home and car by now.

god 15yrs!!!  £27k lighter,  i bet 90% of your £27k were payments to a DCA and they used the money to go down the pub every night or book their staff holiday...:rant:

 

im really glad you've stopped payment to them...

can we see these supposedly enforceable CCA returns

 

put each one in their own multipage PDf please

read upload carefully.

 

for the 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep they just like the dca's that pocketed most of your £27k couldn't careless

they are paid by these orgs and the banks anyway .

 

for consumer debt there is very rarely any need to go BK,IVA, DAS or whatever 

the only one thats of any good is a DRO

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you 

i would go with the conclusions you have made, but pers i'd not be paying anything now to anyone.

doing this cannot harm you, and if things do get sticky on any of the debts.

 

like those already sold to a dca or latterly those that have not, but subsequently do get,

just let them run their games

its quite funny to see them wave their naughty bits around in total frustration, because you are NOT responding.

 

the bottom line id IF you ever get a Letter Of Claim under the Pre Action Protocol that comes with a reply pack.

comeback here and we'll deal,

 

until them

as i say , theres nothing they can do to harm you further , the debts are years removed from CRA files and can never comeback.

 

always read any letters very carefully, you will see they never use the words WILL.

 

dx

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no i said a letter of claim

thats NOT court action .

its the protocol they must abide by should they even thinking of possibly raising a court claim.

 

pers until/if you get a PAPLOC i'd not be entering into any silly letter tennis with anyone

you've been a cash cow far far too long to the fleecers.

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:rockon:

 

 

 

there 100's of threads here on paploc threats.

 

just use our search top right

 

or better is our enhanced google search box

 

letter of claim.

 

the more you read ..the stronger we become.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i wish certain people would not go around every thread and find reasons to needlessly panic people just make themselves appear knowledgeable.

 

original creditors don't do CCJ's.

if the debt is own by a DCA's are not a creditor, but a mere debt buyer.

 

and would have to abide by the pre action protocol as already outlined BeB.

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 yes - they don't want bad publicity.

 

2. a DCA that has bought a debt will often issue a speculative court claim especially if people move and do not update the owners of debts that, lets say they last paid or used within 7yrs, that they have moved.

 

no debt paperwork is needed, they are almost guaranteed a backdoor roboclaim default judgement CCJ as no human is ever involved and nothing is ever checked. which does not apply in your case as they know your AD.

they (as anyone issuing a court claim) must also abide by the pre action protocol as mentioned earlier.

 

any defended court claim would fail if the dca could not produce all the required enforceable paperwork as long as its asked for.

most dca's don't ever go thru the OC, they just raid their filling cabinet, cut and paste and fake the paperwork hoping the judge is stupid, which is why the devil is the in the detail and as a defendant you put them to strict proof.

 

dx

 

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

there are numerous like stories already here in the same forum that your thread is in

might help you to scroll through a read a few.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/124-debt-management-and-debt-self-help/

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:rockon:

  • Haha 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bon-ee-bon said:

following my letter to Link Financial advising them I will not pay any further due to lack of CCA

 

or sure where we ever said to send a pointless letter stating they have no cca ....buzz off?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...