Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Paragraph 2. I think there should be further down and also you should make the point that the payment to was made unilaterally and without the imposition of any conditions. Paragraph 3 – this is unnecessary because you are not claiming as an entitled third-party. This worries me because it makes me feel that you haven't fully read around because this is a paragraph which you would include where you were suing EVRi as a beneficial third party because you had actually made your contract with Packlink or some other broker. I think you need to revisit and do some more reading. I'm afraid I have a sense that you have simply copied this from somebody else's witness statement without understanding that it wasn't necessary. Please can you post the amended draft. Other than the suggestions above, it looks okay – but let's see it again for a further appraisal. In terms of the evidence, parties bundle, I think it might be an idea to start off with the correspondence with EVRi and then go onto the other evidence. You will have to amend the index page accordingly. You could shorten this bit. Take 19 is pretty well blank and you may as well miss it out also, there seems to be some repetition of emails and the email chain. I think will be worth going through and getting rid of duplicates if you can. 49 pages is a bit long and it would be a good idea to try and reduce the number. I have a feeling that 50 pages as the County Court limit anyway. The judge will be happier with you if the bundle is smaller. Maybe you could reduce the size of some of the images or messages et cetera. You have got several messages which straddle onto a second page so that things like sign off information and standard confidentiality information become orphans. A bit of manipulation and they could be joined to their parents I think. Page 31 as an example. So is page 19. You may only be up to shorten the whole thing by 56 pages – but I think it would be a good idea. 56 pages is, after all, 10%. If you can do more then so much the better
    • Investment by Dutch brewing giant will create 1,000 new jobs and reopen dozens of closed pubsView the full article
    • Qantas agrees to pay millions to settle lawsuit accusing it of selling tickets to cancelled flights.View the full article
    • Why the Nordic nation, despite its reputation for social equality, has so many billionaires.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Backdoor Arrow/Drydens 2008 CCJ/CO - MBNA Card - , debt was already SB'd , **WON** set aside - Now being chased 12yrs later.!!


mandyjayne
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1206 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi mandyjayne,

 

You need to get hold of an N244 from here:

 

http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/HMCSCourtFinder/GetForms.do

 

Then fill it out as per surfaceagentx20's instructions:

 

A Defendant faced with a Claimant who declines to deal with his CPR 31.14 obligations promptly (ie within 7 days of the request) may file an application with the court in Form N244 for an appropriate order.

 

The following text is fom a post I made in wakeywakey's thread entitled: 'Marlins/Arrow Global have no CCA-Now what?' and deals with the completion of the N244 for an appropriate order folowing a Claimant's failure to comply with a CPR 31.14 request.

 

In box [3] of the N244 write:

 

'An order that unless within 14 days of the making of an order upon this application the Claimant complies with a request made by the Defendant on (date) pursuant to CPR 31.14 by the provision to the Defendant of documents mentioned in the Particulars of Claim, namely [1] the agreement [2] the default notice and [3] the assignment, the claim shall stand struck out and the Defendant shall be at liberty to enter judgment against the Claimant without further order of the court with the costs of this case to be paid by the Claimant to the Defendant to be assessed on the standard basis and pursuant to the provisions of The Litigants in Person (Costs and Expenses) Act 1975.

 

The application is made because of the Claimant's refusal to comply with the Defendant's CPR 31.14 request and the documents are required owing to [here add any special feature or requirement of the case] and to enable the proper preparation of a Defence.'

 

In Box 4 write: 'Yes'

In Box 5 write: 'Without a hearing'

Ignore Box 6

In Box 7 write: 'None'

In Box 8 write: 'District Judge'

In Box 9 write: 'Claimant'

In Box 10 tick the box marked 'the evidence set out in the box below' and beneath it write:

 

'On (date), following service of the Claim Form in this case, I wrote to the Claimant requesting inspection of documents mentioned in the Particulars of Claim pursuant to CPR 31.14. A copy of my letter of request is attached to this application notice marked 'A'.

 

The following is the text taken from my wakeywakey post but hopefully will assist with a gist of the sort of thing to say:

 

[The Claimant replied by letter dated (date) rejecting my request on the ground it had no obligation to comply. A copy of this reply is attached to this application notice marked 'B'.

 

The agreement relied upon by the Claimant is now very old. The documents sought by my request are essential for the proper preparation of my defence and the determination of the claim and CPR 31.14 afford me a right to inspect those documents.']

 

Sign the statement, attach the copies and complete the remainder of the N244 in the usual way applicable to your case.

 

On a separate piece of paper to be attached to your application notice, write this:

 

Claim No:

Draft Order

 

1 Unless by 4:00pm on (date) the Claimant complies with a request made by the Defendant on (date) pursuant to CPR 31.14 by the provision to the Defendant of documents mentioned in the Particulars of Claim, namely [here list the documents sought in the CPR 31.14 request for example, [1] the agreement [2] the default notice and [3] the assignment,]

the claim shall stand struck out and the Defendant shall be at liberty to enter judgment against the Claimant without further order of the court, and

[ii] the Claimant shall pay the Defendant his/her costs of this case to be assessed on the standard basis and pursuant to the provisions of The Litigants in Person (Costs and Expenses) Act 1975.

 

2 In the event that the Claimant shall comply with this order,

the Defendant shall file and serve a Defence by 4:00pm on (date) and

[ii] the Claimant shall pay the Defendant his/her costs of this application [in any event] [assessed in the sum of £130.00]

 

The fee payable to the court on filing this application is presently £75.00.

Edited by DocH

A couple of hundred years ago Meyer Amshel, (1743-1812), founder of the Rothschild dynasty is reported to have told his five sons, “Let me control a nation’s money and I care not who writes its laws”.

 

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what I have written is my own opinion garnered from reading this forum and consumer legislation, and my own experience of the judicial process.

 

If I have been helpful, please feel free to tickle my scales!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 486
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

thank you so much DocH

this is exactly what i meant that i needed help with, just a couple of questions, 1) do i have to do a new n244 as i have already done one and paid £75

2)if i have to then thats fine will do asap just need to clarify if i need to do a additonal one or add to the one that the court already have, just for info i still have not recieved any replies to my CPR 31

thank you once again for your help lets hope i'm posting soon on how to claim back my costs!:D

regards MJ

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mandyjane, what was your previous N244 for? Was it the same issue with the CPR 31 request or something else. If it was concerning the CPR 31 request what did you ask the court to do?

 

thank you once again for your help lets hope i'm posting soon on how to claim back my costs!:grin:

regards MJ

 

:-)

A couple of hundred years ago Meyer Amshel, (1743-1812), founder of the Rothschild dynasty is reported to have told his five sons, “Let me control a nation’s money and I care not who writes its laws”.

 

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what I have written is my own opinion garnered from reading this forum and consumer legislation, and my own experience of the judicial process.

 

If I have been helpful, please feel free to tickle my scales!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DocH,

Posted below is the original 244, submitted to the court and drafted by eLL-enn, because the limitations act also applies.and i have been given a hearing on march 11th to have this set aside hopefully, but anything else i can add regarding their non compliance would be helpful do you think? can you advise what to do as a next step?

still have not recieved anything through the post regarding the cpr31 request

many thanks again MJ

elle-enn's n244 draft is on my post 42 should the attachment not open here.

 

Hi there, affixed draft text for Q.10 of your N244. You will need to enter the claim number, court, your name and their name in the boxes at the top where there are XXX's and type is in bold (don't edit the boxes on the far right "claimant" "defendant").

 

Also I have put XXX's for the date you have lived at your present address from (3rd bullet point) so you need to put the info in there.

 

Where I have referred to Appendix 1 being affixed you need to take a photocopy of the letter you sent to them and also the message from the post office website. Then write the claim number and Appendix 1 on the top of each piece of correspondence.

 

At Q.10 on the form tick the box for attached witness statement.

 

Q.3 "that the County Court Judgement in respect of the above numbered claim be set aside for reasons set out in the attached witness statement.

 

Any questions, just shout.

 

Ell-enn

Attached Files

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mandjayne,

 

I've just had a read through your whole thread to try and get the facts straight in my head. On 11 Mar you have a hearing to set aside the CCJ. At this hearing you will need to explain why you did not defend the action originally. That was because the claim was not served on you, and indeed the court papers say so, and had you received the papers you would have defended.

 

The next step the judge will be looking at is to see if you have reasonable grounds on which to defend the claim. This does not necessarily mean that the defence could win you the case, but it must not be something 'fanciful'. Your defence is that the debt was statute barred under the Limitations Act Section 5 and that the claimant was barred from taking any enforcement action. No proof has been provided by the claimant by way of a Credit Card Agreement in support of their claim. The statement that Ell-enn provided supports your N244 application for the set aside. There is no need to submit a fully detailed defence at this stage, just the outline as detailed in Ell-enn's statement.

 

The hearing will only likely take 5 to 10 minutes. The judge will then make his/her decision. If she/he agrees to set aside the judgement (the Charging Order will also be automatically set aside as well) then she/he will order that you submit your defence within a time frame of possibly 14 or 28 days from the date of the hearing.

 

Now I would suggest that you hold off on sending the latest N244 (in support of your CPR 31 request) until about a week before your hearing. You can then ask the County Court Manager to list this for the same time as your hearing for the set aside application.

 

I've attached Ell-enn's statement for ease of reference.

 

MandyjayneN244[1].doc

  • Haha 1

A couple of hundred years ago Meyer Amshel, (1743-1812), founder of the Rothschild dynasty is reported to have told his five sons, “Let me control a nation’s money and I care not who writes its laws”.

 

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what I have written is my own opinion garnered from reading this forum and consumer legislation, and my own experience of the judicial process.

 

If I have been helpful, please feel free to tickle my scales!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DocH

 

Once again many thanks for your help..that all makes sense to me i understand..so new n244 about a week before 11th march the one you have posted i will amend and use. Sent CPR31 request on 22nd Jan...nothing received..still!

Just in case i need to claim costs..how do i work this out..i know all recorded delivery letters and prob 2 n244's @£75.00 each.... what about everything else?

 

If anyone has any idea i could be working on that in the meantime:D!

 

thanks again MJ

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing at a time here I think.....let's not get ahead of ourselves.

 

Might just be worth reading and researching the Limitations Act Section 5; and understanding why it is statute barred.

It will be a judge you are explaining this to and he may choose to ask why you think that this is the case.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi supa..

 

It was a little light hearted moment..not taken literally!!

 

I have read vast amounts on here about limitations act...the fact i have not heard via post telephone or made any payments for more than 6 years i think puts me hopefuly in that catagory??

 

i now am hoping i have the non compliance of my cpr31 on my side also

 

mj

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MJ, definitely statute barred, no doubt at all :D

 

To be honest with you I am not surprised that you've not had a response to the CPR request. At the moment the CCJ is in force, and until it is set aside by the judge, the claimants do not need to respond to it.

 

Let me explain. A CPR request is made as part of the pre-trial process in order for you to obtain the documents the claimant will be relying on in court. At the moment there is no court claim/trial in process. When the judge sets aside the CCJ there will be the possibility of a trial and the claimant will need to respond. If the claimant has any sense at all, they should discontinue the action once the set aside has been granted.

 

If you are feeling that confident about 'winning' the case then there are a number of threads on CAG concerning wasted cost claims ;)

A couple of hundred years ago Meyer Amshel, (1743-1812), founder of the Rothschild dynasty is reported to have told his five sons, “Let me control a nation’s money and I care not who writes its laws”.

 

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what I have written is my own opinion garnered from reading this forum and consumer legislation, and my own experience of the judicial process.

 

If I have been helpful, please feel free to tickle my scales!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all..

 

Thanks Doc and Supa...

 

You have both without doubt been so much help to me!

 

Doc you explain things perfectly in laymans terms...and i always understand what you post for me.:D

 

Supa you have helped no end.. especially when i couldnt work out photobucket..silly me!

 

11th March is fast approaching please put a note in your diaries to keep an eye out for me..im gonna need all the help i can get;)!!

 

forever grateful

 

MJ:D

Edited by mandyjayne
add on

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MJ, glad to have been able to have helped you. Good luck for the 11 March, not that you'll need it as you have a strong case. Diary has been noted and we'll all be there in spirit for you.:)

 

If you have any other questions then just shout.

 

Regards

DocH

A couple of hundred years ago Meyer Amshel, (1743-1812), founder of the Rothschild dynasty is reported to have told his five sons, “Let me control a nation’s money and I care not who writes its laws”.

 

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what I have written is my own opinion garnered from reading this forum and consumer legislation, and my own experience of the judicial process.

 

If I have been helpful, please feel free to tickle my scales!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all...(DocH if you pick this up!)

 

I have just spoken to the court and i dont need to submit a new n244 for the non-compliance of the cpr31...i can in fact add to the one already there:D.

On post 131 DocH has given me surfaceagentx20's draft for an n244, i will amend this one but can i have advice on how to draft it, if it now does not have to be on an n244. Hope this makes sense??

 

regards MJ:)

 

bump

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MJ,

 

To be honest I'm not sure, but I would imagine a Witness Statement should do it. Hopefully, someone with a bit more knowledge and experience will provide the answer.

A couple of hundred years ago Meyer Amshel, (1743-1812), founder of the Rothschild dynasty is reported to have told his five sons, “Let me control a nation’s money and I care not who writes its laws”.

 

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what I have written is my own opinion garnered from reading this forum and consumer legislation, and my own experience of the judicial process.

 

If I have been helpful, please feel free to tickle my scales!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all..

 

can someone help me with what dates to put in this draft..my hearing is on 11th March.

 

 

 

Claim No:

Draft Order

 

1 Unless by 4:00pm on (date) the Claimant complies with a request made by the Defendant on (date) pursuant to CPR 31.14 by the provision to the Defendant of documents mentioned in the Particulars of Claim, namely [here list the documents sought in the CPR 31.14 request for example, [1] the agreement [2] the default notice and [3] the assignment,]

the claim shall stand struck out and the Defendant shall be at liberty to enter judgment against the Claimant without further order of the court, and

[ii] the Claimant shall pay the Defendant his/her costs of this case to be assessed on the standard basis and pursuant to the provisions of The Litigants in Person (Costs and Expenses) Act 1975.

 

2 In the event that the Claimant shall comply with this order,

the Defendant shall file and serve a Defence by 4:00pm on (date) and

[ii] the Claimant shall pay the Defendant his/her costs of this application [in any event] [assessed in the sum of £130.00]

 

bump..

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Leave the dates blank. The court office will fill in the appropriate dates if and when the judge grants the order.

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys...

 

Well my hearing is fast approaching..wednesday this week..any last minute things i should be doing, or any advise would be helpful.

 

I sent off last week the additional witness statement as above. Not sure if anything else needs to be done at this stage???? help please??

 

regards MJ

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mandyjane,

 

You've done all that needs to be done, all you've got to do now is turn up on the day of the hearing. Try to be at the court about an hour before your case is due to be heard, take your partner or a friend for moral support if you can.

 

I know at the moment the process probably seems very daunting, but when you go into the judge's office, it is very likely that it will be only you and the judge and maybe a representative of the claimants if they bother to turn up.

 

Good luck, and let us know the outcome.

A couple of hundred years ago Meyer Amshel, (1743-1812), founder of the Rothschild dynasty is reported to have told his five sons, “Let me control a nation’s money and I care not who writes its laws”.

 

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what I have written is my own opinion garnered from reading this forum and consumer legislation, and my own experience of the judicial process.

 

If I have been helpful, please feel free to tickle my scales!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi urgent help please..

 

court hearing today at 2..received yesterday, claiments witness statement and costs.

 

most of it is pretty straightforward, but can someone comment on their point number 8 and 13?

 

No: 8 "The defendant states that the account is statute barred under section 5 of the limitation act 1980. Section 5 of the limitation act states etc...

the cause of action which resulted in the full balance being payable immediately occurred on the 30th may 2006 by way of termination of the account, therefore the account is NOT statute barred" (they have not included any proof of last payment or mbna statements from 2000)

 

No: 13 "The defendant at all times was fully aware of the debt she owed and the nature of the claim against her. The claimant avers that the defence is both inappropriate and ineffective as it is intended to deliberately frustrate and delay legal proceedings by use of incorrect and misconstrued technicalities in law. It is contended that the defendant has sought to abuse the court process and mislead the court. For the reasons set out above i invite this honourable court to grant the claiment judgment in the amount claimed. Further or in the alternative i invite the court to strike out the application on the grounds that the defendant did not comply with the ts and cs of the credit agreement and enter judgment in favour of the claiment."

 

They have attached copies of only 4 letters they claim to have sent me since feb 2007...none of the letters are on headed paper they have clearly typed these last week! One saying the debt has now been passed to them...contact us and pay now.

A week later a reminder to the first one.

2 months later a final demand.

2 months later considering CCj/charging order.

Fees of £345.00

 

Also..at the end of each letter is says yours faithfully Marlin Financial Services..well who the hell are they??? The claiment is Arrow Global

 

Help please MJ:mad: ps...(do i take costs to hearing as well?? if yes how do i do it)

 

urgent bump

Edited by mandyjayne
add on

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok wish me luck...

 

i have come up with the following for costs

 

N244 £75.00

postage £14.60

Milage £3.00

Parking £2.00

Postal Orders £11.00

Loss of earnings £60

Research@£9.25 x 10 hours (its more than this!!!!)

 

can you advise if this is ok???

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't really add any more....I think you have to show some resolve in front of the judge.....state that they have provided no evidence by way of your SAR (which is more than a reasonable attempt to get information) that the debt is NOT statute barred and are attempting to mislead the court themselves, when clearly there is a 6 year gap, but they have evaded providing any evidence...as for part 13 the judge will not buy that.....just remember common sense MJ..As for the letters they have sent you are they dated ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...