Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The outlet is in Camden Town and was set up in 2006, a year after my husband established the business, in addition to selling at exhibitions, online, shows, events, and having licensing agreements in some places overseas.  The only thing I have stopped doing since I got ill is the physical stuff, which I’m working on. The business has not changed name or anything like that either. I’m not sure where the original contract with Camden is but the management must still have it. My husband died in Jan 2017, and until Sept 2018, I would take the stock in every week; after that I was sending it in by post. I went in now and then when possible to re-do the display but that was about it. No one had access to any files until 2020. Moved house in 2020 thought would have to pull it all, Covid had just hit as well. The person in question said he would be interested in taking over and paying the rent etc. so I said I would let him sell the pictures for nothing as long as he would ‘keep it warm’ for me.  Obviously, everywhere was closed for lockdown. During this time I was working out how to go forward.  In May 2022 I told him I couldn’t  give anything away for free anymore, and put in place the wholesale agreement.  I’ve disregarded any discrepancies from before this date. I sent over the jpgs electronically, so I’ve still got them too. He hasn’t got any original files like .psds negatives or memory cards etc, I’ve got proof of all ownership/copyright. A co-op is whereby a small number of neighbours work on a rotational basis so they each of them can have time off, that way everyone doesn’t need to be there at the same time, he had never been an employee of mine.  The only reason I allowed him to have the files in the first place as I didn’t want to lose that side of the business.  It’s a good, constant source of income. However, the rent was becoming crippling as I believed there was something fishy going on well before this as there’s so much cash dealt with there, and I couldn’t go in regularly in person, and I’m sure sales weren’t being recorded properly and cash was being pocketed. My husband was too busy to be doing any stock control properly, he wasn't really into paperwork, and the guy who was ‘helping’ me after my husband's death, was making things very difficult for me to implement a solid stock control system by refusing to co-operate on simple things like using email etc. which I thought was a smokescreen, so I severed ties with him just before I made the agreement in question. I sent about 100 images, jpg files, sent via We Transfer. I’ve got the confirmation of which files were sent with dates. I will have to go through closed bank accounts and previous tax returns to get a proper estimate.   Before I made this agreement, I was selling retail there, this is a wholesale agreement so I’ll have to do some calculations but it is definitely in the thousands.  I haven’t got his his home address, and I don't think he's got any sizeable assets. I’m also worried that he might send the files overseas and start selling them there. I know he’s not stupid enough to sell them online. He knows for sure how serious this is, but he’s been chancing it and thinks I’m stupid, if not soft and stupid. I don’t know if this would work but I am thinking that when he does contact me, I tell him we need to talk, tell him I know what he’s been up to, and strongly urge him not to order any more prints from wherever he is having them printed because it will make things much worse for him if he does. Then when I do tell him about the gravity of the situation, maybe a few days later, I think it will scare him into complying because the consequences definitely trump the few quid he thinks he is saving by getting his own printing done. Tell him an amount that I want back for lost revenue, and make it clear that if he doesn’t destroy the files and if I find out he is still doing it at any point down the line, I will seek prosecution for copyright infringement and fraud, which I will. I don’t know how I can enforce any of this without involving the courts though. I will be able to tell, though, and he will know this. And the only reason I am doing this now rather than before, is that I couldn’t prove anything until now.  It was screamingly obvious from the beginning though, as he wasn’t ordering enough from me to pay the rent, let alone make a profit. If I decided to come down like him lie a ton of bricks straight away, how would I go about a cease and desist, would I have to get one from the court? And what do I do about the stock he currently holds? It has also occurred to me that he might file for bankruptcy or similar if things get heavy, where would that leave me? I could put the feelers out for a brand-new person to take it on, obviously without giving them access to files, that is an option. But that comes with its own set of issues. Also, would there be any implications for me, if I kept quiet for now? Let him order again from me as if nothing has happened, as it will be any day and I want to get all my ducks in a row first ideally….   Thanks again
    • I’ve also just realised their online website they’ve got 12 photographs of my vehicle, including close ups of the inside?? Not sure why that’s relevant.  The time stamp on the first photo is 13:57, the PCN incident time is 14:12. 
    • I’m tempted to send a letter to the company outlining the reasons why I think their PCN is illegitimate. I guess will technically be an appeal.  Their documentation states they won’t discuss over phone, I also don’t want them to have my email address.    re signage on entrance, having looked at land registry, the whole road is private, and when you turn into the road off the highway, there is a sign on the lamppost about 20m in, again not noticeable and on the other side of the road.  I feel like I am in a difficult position with this, I understand that I may have a good chance of not having to pay, but at the same token the stress this is already causing me makes me feel like it’s not worth the £60!
    • Well done with the photo. Of course the signage is insufficient.  PPM are not interested in competent management of a car park, they are interested in catching drivers out so they can issue their PCNs. For a start, according to their trade associations' Codes of Practice, they are supposed to have signage at the entrance. Any e-mail reply from the company and whether they will/won't/can/can't get the invoice cancelled?    
    • I will annotate the message I sent for the forum.  Sorry, didn't see this straight away...
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

backdoor CCJ Aktiv Kaptial - set aside - whats next?


batty69
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1434 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 163
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Damm it didnt send! will wait till I get to 20 post, only 2 more to go, all will become clear!

 

The people involved monitor this forum quite extensively and I have seen how underhand they can be for myself in the way they have handled my case.

 

I'm not taking any chances.

However suffice to say,

they are a well know company on this forum,

who has done this before.

 

Fortunately I have the ear of a cabinet minister who's willing to take this up once it's resolved (they are not allowed to involved in any ongoing legal disputes)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Damn! didnt send, I need 30 to send to you, 20 to mod.

 

Trust me I will, I think when the full facts are revealed there is a good chance of this DCA being stripped of their licence.

 

Yes a solictor is involved, we were planning to take action against these people ourselves.

 

Problem is, he's gone away on hols for a fortnight, this then dropped through the door earlier this week and I have to file early next week.

 

Am desperately trying to get hold of him!

 

Hopes this throws some light on my earlier posts,

because I need to either delay or get away with handing over the bare minimum of my case till I can get hold of him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We know from experience that a single unfortunate ‘admin error’ will not see a debt buyer or DCA stripped of its licence. That’s wishful thinking.

 

Is this your solicitor or theirs? If it’s theirs and he knows what’s going on, the SRA should be your next stop.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's mine, as we were planning to go either fast track or multi-track with the counter claim.

 

I found a recent similiar case to mine where this has happened, the claimant settled out of court.

 

Also there is another company involved who are sort of off the radar, who are doing things this company would never risk in their own name.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh yes, the old "Admin Error" excuse, as we know they are not admin errors.

 

Fortunately they are leaving a big paper trail in my case, that will show it is nothing of the sort.

 

However if said DCA gets wind of what's coming their way, they are going to start covering their arses so they can claim the "Admin Error" excuse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Calling Andy,

can you point me in the direction of a sample particularised defence somewhere?

 

I want to make sure I'm getting the format correct,

 

i.e. not too little info, but not too detailed either.

i.m onto the counter claim part of my defence.

 

how much detail do I need ?

 

is it brief like a POC, particularised POC or Detailed (i.e. cite how, what and why the damages I have claimed for have occured)

 

Andy I've had a good trawl around the forum to find the nearest case to mine in terms of procedure (rather than the case matter) and the closest I can find is this thread which you have been helping on.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?348133-Moved-and-received-CCJ-Help-please/page1

 

on page 4 of the thread, post 67 the posters states

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?348133-Moved-and-received-CCJ-Help-please/page4

 

1. Judgement be set asidelink3.gif

 

2. The defendant do file defence by 4.oopm on 20th July 2012

 

the parallel to my case is that these were the orders that have been given in my case after my set aside, the only difference is that the judge has split these over two orders.

 

In the thread in question, which I am now following religously as it looks like it's going to go down somewhat a similiar path. is that,

 

a) Maybelate wasn't advised to put in a particularised defence at this point

b) After sending in the brief defence, an AQ was sent out and the case started following the "normal" path.

 

I'm a bit confused as this seems a bit contrary to what I have been advised here, what am I missing ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Every claim every defence every scenario is unique batty...there are no parallels or sample particularised defences.It all starts at the Particulars of claim.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I appreciate that,

just trying to get a sense of what I need to get in.

 

I have gone for a "semi-particularised" in that I have used the standard defences on here regarding documentation (where they are missing in my case).

 

Plus added a few other defences which are particular to my case,

 

I'm not accused of adding them later.

 

But are being deficient on citing my evidence till the exchange of witness statements and documents.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the best approach to adopt never be to particularised...keep your options open.Cast doubt and open the claimant along the process.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually what I meant by "Sample Particularised Defence" is the format, e.g. where do you put the date,

do I need to quote case no.,

do I need to make a declaration of truth.

 

what I mean is, not the content, obviously the content is unique to each case, but the format.

 

e.g. when I did my ws for set aside a solicitor contact of mine gave me a template to work from but the details were totally irrevelant to my case (wasn't even a DCA/debt case)

 

I dont want my the defence thrown out because I didn't follow something procedural, like forgetting to quote the case number!

Link to post
Share on other sites

IN THE XXX COUNTY COURT CLAIM NO: XXXXXX

 

Claimant

Nasty Bank

 

 

V

 

Defendant

Batty

 

DEFENCE

 

 

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

 

 

Statement of Truth

 

Dated xxxxx

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Batty you will submit a defence & PT20 Counter Claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...