Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

VCS PCN Claimform - Broomfield Developements Broomspring Close. S37XA ***Claim Dismissed***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1246 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • dx100uk changed the title to VCS PCN Claimform - Broomfield Developements Broomspring Close. S37XA

CPR 31:14  Done ready to send tomorrow.

 

Hi, this alleged infringement occurred in 2015, do I try and get picts in situ now or wait for their witness statement.  I have posted CPR.31.14 registered post.

 

I just donated, good site.  

I will make it up to £185

the amount those tadger worriers demand,

donated £50 now,

when I can afford the rest.  

 

I’d rather give this site the money than them,  

This site helps all.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

No, no result yet,  but I would like to pay site this amount whatever the outcome, it’s here when people need it.  

I think it’s a matter of principle.

 

Also I know CAG pain to these, can’t find word to describe them.  

I presume they read this site, so it will get right up their nose,

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Morning ericsbrother, thanks for your advice.  I would just like to point out I am not “trying to be smart” I was just making people aware that it was Trike that was involved, nothing more nothing less.

 

i know it a motor vehicle, I had to:

1. Insure it to be public highway.

2. Pay road tax.

3. SORN it when off road.

 

i will get pictures off signs ASAP.

 Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ericsbrother, thanks for that piece of advice.  I am at present trying to get my ducks in a row.

 

1. I will try and google the site around dates visit, for any pict of signs and numbers off, location.

2. Get pictures off current signs.  As above 1,

3. Prepare a defence which should be in by June 29 2020, my calculation.  I think this should be short and to the point, any advice will be appreciated..

 

Another point I’ve heard they may offer conciliation service, what is the advice on this.

 

Thanks.

Edited by scotswestie
Link to post
Share on other sites

hi ericsbrother, thanks for that advice.  The points you have given me are what I was thinking, but you made them better, I will put a bit more meat on them,  but not as you say write a book or give to much away.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, ericsbrother, thank you so much for that informative post.  I am going to revisit site tomorrow, I will count  all the signs in situ.  I will then take pictures and rough diagram where they are placed., in-relation to the Trike.

 

i will put the four bullet point in initial defence  you suggested as they seem to apply perfectly as to the Info I have looked up to date.

 

There is no chance of myself backing down, I’m in for the duration, if they want my money it will cost them in time and effort.  I know you are right that they try and frighten people into paying I’n many ways, deception the most obvious and bullshit.

 

I was in Black Watch 20 years, I can smell bullshit at 600  yards, and I’m not easily intimidated.

 

Thanks again.

Edited by scotswestie
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I am going to do that and mark them on overhead google map pict.  They have a no parking with a threat to clamp, will I just ignore that?
 

Also I have tried to find a backdated pict for 2015 for that site but can’t work out how to do it, anybody have any advice.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi brassnecked, I’m glad I got that right. I now need to start assembling my witness statement for if and when it goes to court.  I know I need to submit the 4 bullet point defence ericsbrother advised by 29 June.

 

i sent CPR  to them, they have until 14 June to reply, what happens if they don’t reply?
 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Morning,  I would be grateful if someone can clarify the date I have to submit defence by.  The court paper were issued 28 May 2020.  I did my AOS online on the 30 May 2020, I think my defence should be in by 29 June 2020, am I correct?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ericsbrother, Ive taken Picts,  the sign are chest level on people’s back fences,

if a car was parked in front you would not see it,

also no lighting when dark,

text writing on sign so small.

 

 I tried to get Picts on google from 2015, but having difficulty.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ericsbrother, been a bit busy.  I did a search and Broomspring Close is a public road, which has been adopted by Sheffield City Council.  There was no sign in the bay the Trike had been deposited.  I think you are right is the comments you have made.  Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...