Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 4 hours were soft play with the kids then moved to one of the restaurants for a meal. Restaurant took ages with our order but it was a group of parents so we were in no massive rush.  Ive been trying to find how to determine 100% if the road is public or not as I just based my assumption on the street signs, traffic lights and the bus. Regarding the PCN, does it covers all requirements needed to enforce or do you guys see any clear weak spots? Considering the size of the place and different areas and businesses reachable through that road where the cameras are, I believe is a massive assumption to use those photographs to calculate the time someone was actually parked in a designated parking spot as there are numerous other areas to load, unload, wait for people, drive throughs of restaurants, etc all within the area accessible through the one road where the ANPR is. One can go through most of the areas on street view in google. You can even see a car parked in the middle of the roundabout for example.
    • thought your story rang a bell. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/416315-knightsbridgecreditfix-iva-treated-me-very-badly-thinking-of-bk-now-help/ you vanished and never cameback. dx  
    • and it legally informs them of your correct and current address as you must do with all old debts last paid/used in say 7 yrs you dont want backdoor CCJ's. what were the names of these IVA scammers, the one you took it out with, and the one that scammed you to let them take over please? your story is slightly worrying. dx  
    • Incidentally, congratulations on not buying the warranty. That is another Big Motoring World rip-off. See what we have to say about extended warranties and the Big Motoring World attitude to them is particularly unhelpful
    • well that google is from 2019, but the photos are certainly of someone driving on the public highway in/out by an ANP system, though the site of where the camera actually is, is not showing there are anpr cameras up by the low yellow barriers but they wont get from facing shots from there. interesting, needs to be checked if the road IS a public highway but on private land, cause as you say, if the whole area is max 4hrs , how does the hotel work< ?? must have a reg entry system.  now as for taking pictures of cars on a public highway then guessing the are parking ...erm.... i dont thnk thats right nor allowed under GDPR. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

james vs Lloyds


james_lillystone
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6332 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

firstly big thank you for all the information avaliable on this website (it has become a bit of an overload today mind!)

 

i am now currently at the stage of sending off my letter demanding settlement

 

i have used the templates to detail my charges (http://www.lillystone.co.uk/bank/letter2.htm)

 

and to create the demand letter (http://www.lillystone.co.uk/bank/letter1.htm)

 

i have sent the letter to lloyds head office via registered

is there anything else i need to do at this moment in time?

 

thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

valid point about the personal details, *removed*

 

so far i have sent a letter asking them to detail charges levied against me in the last 6 years, after recieving those this is my second letter to them, i will await a reply before progressing to court proceedings

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

ok so almost 14 days since i sent the letter, i have had a generic letter back from lloyds stating that they will address my complaint within 2 weeks from a kerry parfitt (customer services recovery)

 

should i be waiting for them to reply to my letter properly or have i given them enough warnings to start court procedure? apologies if this seems a stupid question i would like to optimise my chances for success as much as poss! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are 2 instances of interest you can claim:

 

1.When you go overdrawn the bank will charge you interest, perfectly lawfully.

 

However, if part of your overdraft is made up of penalty fees, they are also charging you interest on these too and it is this interest which you are entitled to claim back, but it's tricky to separate out from the total interest figure.

 

Vampiress has a spreadsheet, (the advanced one), in the bank templates library, which attempts to calculate this

 

It's quite complex and unless your claim is large may not amount to that much, so for simplicity's sake, some people don't bother

 

This is the interest referred to in the preliminary and LBA letters.

 

2. Section 69 8% interest on your claim, but only when you submit a claim at court. Don't add this interest before moneyclaim

Link to post
Share on other sites

right, the claim has been issued by the court now (can only be good i guess) but it says the bank has 14 days with which to reply, the issue is that would put it at the 28th Dec.. now do i count the Christmas period into the 14 days or would it just be safer to wait till jan 2nd before i continue?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have finally got a generic reply from Lloyds (http://www.lillystone.co.uk/bank/letter.gif),

it states that these are not penalty charges but are infact fee's of service, as a result they will not be refunding these 'service charges' back to me.

 

now is it worth me replying to this letter stating my intentions of pursuing this in the courts or do you think it is wiser not to?

 

am thinking a short letter saying that "i do not agree with the use of the term 'service charge' and unless they want this to go to the courts then to refund these charges asap" might be in order but being the nervous one i am unsure as to where to go with this..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

stupid question, i notice the link to the n149 form in pdf format.. can i just fill that in on the computer and print it to submit to the court or do i need to use the proper document provided in the defence pack?

 

had a good read of the other thread, from my understanding i now need to do the following

 

a) fill in the AQ form including reason as to why this should be done as a fast claims track

b) attach draft order for directions to AQ

c) send both off with £100 for my claim (it being £2500ish)

d) wait for the judges decision then send off the 4 sections to my draft order to both the court and the defendent..

e) wait for court date and cross fingers?

 

anything missed? ty in advance

 

 

just a quick amendment, here is a copy of my text i have used for the "other information" section of the AQ

 

I have attached a draft order of directions which I hope you will consider when allocating this case, I believe this case will last no longer then an hour in your court as the claim is a matter of fact and not of law.

 

The issue is only whether the money levied by the Defendant in respect of its customer’s contractual breaches exceed their actual costs incurred. I am happy to pay their actual costs and I am surprised the Defendant did not counterclaim for these, because I would have paid them without argument.

 

again, have i missed anything and is this sufficient:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

a) fill in the AQ form including reason as to why this should be done as a fast claims track

No just the opposite, your asking for small claims track, but with Standard Disclosure (normal only for fast and multi-track)

 

I am respectfully requesting that my claim be allocated to the small claims track. This issue is not a complicated one; it is an issue of fact and not of law. The issue is only whether the money levied by the Defendant in respect of its customer’s contractual breaches exceed their actual costs incurred. I am happy to pay their actual costs and I am surprised the Defendant did not counterclaim for these, because I would have paid them without argument.

 

However, the continuing problem is, (in common with the 100s of other cases currently being brought by other bank customers), that the banks refuse to reveal the details of their penalty-charging regime. As the banks have a fiduciary duty towards their customers, they have a duty to deal straightforwardly and in utmost good faith.

 

Accordingly, I would respectfully ask that the court in this case, not withstanding allocation to the small claims track, order standard disclosure. I understand that it is in the courts discretion to do so. This would bring a rapid end, not only to this litigation, but would also likely bring an end to much of the litigation in progress against other high-street banks.

 

 

 

b) attach draft order for directions to AQ

c) send both off with £100 for my claim (it being £2500ish)

d) wait for the judges decision then send off the 4 sections to my draft order to both the court and the defendent..

e) wait for court date and cross fingers?

 

Spot on

 

i notice the link to the n149 form in pdf format.. can i just fill that in on the computer and print it to submit to the court
Yes, but don't send it until you get the defence and Aq from the court.
Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for your advice, one more thing i forgot to mention was the payment part, what is the best practice for this? post a cheque in with the form or visit the court and pay over the counter?

 

i am not sure why i put a) down, been a long day but i didnt do that, only bit i put in on the AQ was the "matter of fact and not law" section of my previous post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...