Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Won FOS Complaint but Barclays not complying


Dazza75
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1410 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Wonder if I can get some advice please.

 

Started a charge back via Barclays (Amazon) in March. They asked for additional info which I provided.

 

Additional info/proof not attached to my file, but proved Id sent it via 1st Class recorded.

 

Barclays debited my account by over £700 due to the failed CB - Raised a complaint with them, offered £75, then £150 compensation, but I pay the debit amount of over £700.

 

I declined, as my charge back failed due to them not attaching my evidence to the case. Charge back was a clear case of sent back, with tracking via parcelforce so all easily proved.

 

Complained to FOS. Its taken a few months but just over 4 weeks ago FOS sided with me.

Barclays agreed that they acted unfairly and made critical errors with the charge back. They were given 28 days to make good.

They had to amend my credit file, I was advised this would take a couple of weeks, and Barclays would write to me to advise its completion.

Pay me £150 compensation for the hassle they have caused and return my £70 that was in the account previously, they would also cover the charge back amount as they admitted it was their error that caused the CB to fail.

 

During these passing months, Barclays closed my bank account, leaving me with no bank account at all.

The marked my account in Default with Experian

, I have been unable to open any other bank account because of this default (Ive tried 2) Natwest gave me an account, then withdrew the service 2 weeks later. Went to Co-op for a basic cash minder account, they refused me completely. 

 

The 28 day period to carry out all of the making good has now passed. FOS said they have to give them that amount of time.

 

As this has now passed, can I reject their offer and take it further?

They have caused me so much hassle,

they have admitted all issues were their fault, and now they are not doing what they said they would to make things right

. Its been a nightmare not having a bank account, and my credit file is still ruined and I've just had enough of being treated so badly by them, when it wasn't my fault in the first place.

 

Cheers for any advice.

 

28 days have passed. The default is still on my Experian credit file.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies. On Equifax (not experian sorry) it says there is no Cifas, which surprises me as The Co-operative bank will only reject a cash minder account if you are bankrupt or have a cifas marker against you, and I am not bankrupt and never have been. So the only other reason is a Cifas marker, but it does say there isn't one on the Equifax credit file info.

 

I can SAR the bank. Is it still worth a SAR to Cifas?

 

When I refused the compensation of £150 in either March or April, the guy I spoke to on the phone said I need to pay the amount they debited for the CB, of over £700, I told him I would not be paying it and would be making a complain to FOS and he said that is my choice. I then received a letter telling me my account would be closed as it was in debit and they did close it. They said it would be passed onto the debt collection dept but no one ever contacted me again about the debt, not Barclays or any debt collection people.

 

A week or so later, a lady rang me to follow up on my complaint. I told her as far as I was concerned it was closed as Barclays told me this, but she said no, she is following it up. She asked me for info and a copy of the evidence I had originally sent it when they asked for it (this is the evidence they failed to attach to my case) I sent this to her. She rang again telling me I had not sent the items back to Amazon within 28 days, and therefor my CB would have failed. I then proved to her it was sent the day after it arrived via more tracking. She said she would look into it again and get back to me but she or Barclays never did.

 

FOS said they had seen a file from Barclays which said I had a very good case, but against Amazon. So they were saying I should take Amazon to the small claims court. But I had tried and tried with Amazon to get a refund and they told me they would refund, but never did.

 

It got quite complicated after a while.

 

So, FOS have said they cannot make Barclays give me my account back, and feel £150 compensation is a good deal.

 

Have the FOS let them off lightly? Do I contact the case worker again to chase them, or just take it further myself? I feel they have gotten away pretty lightly considering they have screwed my credit file and done nothing to makes things better even though they agreed to do so. It isn't money I am concerned with here, its just the fact that they have really treated me badly, and gotten away with it, I never did anything wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just a quick update here.

 

Have sent a sar request to the bank and Cifas, will take a while for a reply, but once I have the info I will go through it thoroughly and come back for further advice.

 

Still nothing from Barclays regarding compensation, my own funds in the account which they have kept, or clearing the default on my credit file, so will leave it and await the SAR info.

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Have received the data from Barclays Bank today. A few pages are blacked out so cannot see whats on some of it but going through it. Nothing jumping out at me at all. Is there something specific I should look for regarding Cifas?

 

One thing I have noticed, there is a section that says the following and is dated 30th May 2019 which is when they closed the account.

 

Group Segment Code B30 Closed by bank. DO NOT RE-OPEN

 

Segment code B32 Contact National Fraud Team. See notepad.

 

No other info there though regarding this.

 

Still waiting for the report from Cifas which I guess is going to give me the information I need.

 

Just checked my credit file with Equifax and still in default, so what they agreed to do due to the FOS decision, they have still ignored, I can't understand this as they agreed to do it and then contact me to let me know it had been done.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't taken any county court action as yet because I wanted to wait for the reports from the bank and Cifas, just in case that would be needed to prove anything, but also, as I haven't had any correspondence at all from the bank I'm not sure what I could have done. The case manager at the FOS has told me Barclays agreed with his solution and said they will do what was asked of them, but that email is all I have. There has been no official letter detailing what they will do, just that email from the FOS.

 

The FOS sent them a letter which was copied to me via email, they listed their ways of resolving this dispute and gave them a time frame to reply. Barclays didn't reply in this time frame, so I chased the FOS, who then chased Barclays, and he emailed me to say they had agreed with his findings and they will be carried out within 28 days. 28 days took us to the 29th December 2019 and involved amending my credit record. Paying off the debt circa £778, paying me £150 compensation, and returning my own money which was in the account at the time of closure. But as I say, the only evidence I have of this happening was the email from the FOS.

 

4 hours ago, BankFodder said:

Also it seems to me that they may have now breached their duties under the data protection act in terms of the disclosure.

Is this because there are a few blacked out areas on the report? Also, when you say follow the SAR link, what do I need to be looking at? I've clicked the SAR link but am not seeing what I need to look for I'm sorry.

 

4 hours ago, BankFodder said:

Have you contacted the credit reference agency about this?

 

Not yet, as I mentioned, I have nothing in writing from Barclays to confirm they will do this, the FOS have confirmed via email that Barclays will amend my credit record, and then send me a letter to confirm its done, but it hasn't been done and I have had no letter from anyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

Quick update.

I have contacted the FOS and asked for written confirmation of the decision made so that I can take court action.

 

I have had my Cifas report today.

 

It states.

Barclays Bank registered a 1st party fraud report against me on the 30th May 2019.

This is the date they closed my account.

 

Case Type: Misuse of facility.

Reasons: Multiple encashment fraud.

Cifas Filing:

First party fraud

- (Opening an account or other facility for a fraudulent purpose or the fraudulent misuse of an account or facility;

or taking out and insurance policy for a fraudulent purpose or the fraudulent misuse of an insurance policy and/or insurance policy documentation)

 

So, they told the FOS early December that my credit file would be amended and any negative reports would be removed, but as of today the account is still in default with Equifax and I still have the Cifas registered against my name.

 

I've looked up Multiple Encashment Fraud.

When they put the chargeback amount back into my bank account, which they did the day I made the chargeback, I spent the cash over the next couple of weeks.

 

I did this because I assumed I would win the chargeback due to the fact that I did everything required to win it.

me spending that cash, according to them is Multiple Encashment Fraud.

 

They are saying I fraudulently made a chargeback so that they would put that amount back into my account so I could spend it, and rip the bank off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The adjudicator made the decision. He sent a letter to the bank saying he believes I am in the right. They should pay the debit amount. Give me the cash back that was left in my account and also pay me £150 compensation. Then clear any default notices with Equifax
 

The bank and I agreed with his findings and because of this it didn’t go to an ombudsman. He also said Barclays would write to me once all completed. As I said nothing has been done. 
 

I emailed the adjudicator today and he has emailed a copy of his letter that he sent to them detailing the above. Then I have the email from him where he states they agreed with his findings and they will do as he said. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't attempt to open one of those accounts because I wanted to wait and see if I had a cifas registered against me. I wasn't sure if it would affect my credit file further so thought it better to wait for the info from Cifas. I am able to use someone else's account at the minute so although its awkward, it was just easier for me.

 

Attached are the letter from the FOS to Barlcays advising of the suggested solution. In this letter it states I was paid £150 compensation, I wasn't and I did inform them of this.

 

CIFAS letter.

 

Emails between me and FOS confirming Barclays agree with the outcome.

 

 

 

 

 

 

docs1.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

One more thing to mention. Having received the bank info after the SAR to them, there is no mention of a cifas marker on the paperwork they sent to me, is it possible this is in the blacked out parts of the paperwork and are they able to cover that up in their own paperwork?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 08/02/2020 at 17:55, fkofilee said:

IMHO I dont think Barclays have enough proof for this case to register CIFAS Cat x Markers against you. 

Based upon whats been provided - You havent acted unlawfully and they have been very overzealous. 

 

Before they placed the CIFAS which was done on the day they closed my account, 30th May, they admitted that I have a strong case, but against Amazon, the FOS have seen this as its on the paperwork barclays sent to them, So them admitting I have a strong case surely means they don't think I have committed fraud, and yet they still placed the marker saying I intentionally used the account to commit fraud against the bank.

 

The adjudicator is ringing me this morning for a chat so I will see what happens with him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have spoken to the adjudicator.

 

He said if it goes to an ombudsman I am open to the bank changing their minds about accepting responsibility and they may decide to change their minds and dispute liability.

 

I then mentioned the fact that they have not actioned any of his decision, which they did agree to in November, ie cover the debit amount, amend my credit file and pay £150 compensation. He didn't know they hadn't done this (even though I did tell him last week in my email to him, he obviously took no notice)

 

He said he will speak to Barclays today and get back to me later by phone. He said he will ask why they have not followed through with what they agreed to do in November, and will also ask about the CIFAS to see if they will remove it.

 

He seems to think that if they say they will sort this out today, then everything is all good, but really it isn't. An unfair Cifas for 9 months that has affected my credit file quite badly, and agreeing to put things right, but 3 months later they still haven't. It seems very unfair that they can do all of this and get away with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The £150 compensation offered in November was accepted on the basis that they would immediately resolve all of the issues caused by them. At that time I had no idea they had placed the CIFAS marker against my name. So if there is some sort of offer of compensation then I should refuse it and tell the ombudsman's office that I will take that up separately? To be honest I don't think there will be any offer of compensation for the CIFAS at all, the adjudicator I have been dealing with is a nice guy but he seems to want to deal with everything politely and be kind to Barclays and I am past that point now.

 

I had to explain to him twice that they hadn't done any of the things they promised to do in November, and he still didn't understand. He thought they had done as promised and I was just asking for the complaint to be looked at by an ombudsman due to the CIFAS being issued. I think by the end of the call he understood and said he believes the CIFAS was entered against me in error, but that doesn't help me and it doesn't answer why they agreed with his findings in November, and then did nothing.

 

Barclays had admitted to the adjudicator that they believed I had a strong case, but against Amazon. They came to this decision themselves before 30th May 2019, but still issued the CIFAS on 30th May 2019. So they agreed I had not committed fraud, by admitting I had a strong case, and then still issued the CIFAS saying I had committed first party fraud.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It really is crazy. No one seems to know what they did, why they did it, and why they didn't resolve it.

 

The adjudicator doesn't seem that bothered that they issued a cifas. Before I knew of the cifas, I suspected they had placed one and told the adjudicator about it and he said, if there is a cifas, it wouldn't be Barclays that issued it as this isn't a situation where cifas applies.

 

He seems to think he can call Barclays today, tell them to sort it out, and then all is well and good, but I then have to wait to see if they do sort it out, then wait longer to see if the default comes off my credit file, and then await a letter from them to confirm what has been done and if the cifas has been removed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have just spoken to the adjudicator.

 

Firstly, Barclays say they did not action any of his recommendations as they thought there was still an outstanding balance on the account. There absolutely is no outstanding balance. I did infact have a positive balance in there before they reversed the chargeback and put the account into debit. So there is an outstanding balance at the minute of £739, but that is because they reversed the chargeback. The recommendation from the FOS was that they accept responsibility for that amount, which they agreed to do, but haven't.

 

He said they only actioned some of his recommendations and not all due to them thinking I still owed them money other than the reversed chargeback. I told him they actioned zero of his recommendations.

 

He mentioned the CIFAS, and said he isn't sure as yet if that was placed by them due to this issue. I told him it was registered the day they closed my account. I haven't had any bank issues before this and have certainly not tried to defraud them at any point, so he said he cannot discuss that until he knows the reason for it.

 

He said they had already paid me the £150 compensation, which was agreed in November. They have never done this. He said they had taken it off the debit balance that I owed them. I said no they haven't.

 

He seems to have no clue what he is talking about at all, and the person at Barclays he spoke to also have no idea what they are talking about.

 

Its an absolute farce.

 

He said he is now waiting for an email from them, explaining why they haven't done anything and also why they placed the CIFAS, and he will let me know when he receives this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am going to email him this evening, he has no idea what he is talking about so I am going to bullet point everything that has happened so far, and everything that has not happened. He seems to be taking the word of Barclays over me, and believing what they say, and what they are saying is wrong. They do not even know what they are talking about from what he has spoken about today.

 

3 minutes ago, BankFodder said:

Also being a bit in arrears – which is what they seem to be saying – doesn't seem to me to be any basis for putting a CIFAS marker on your account and I think that you should point this out in writing and ask in what way is it considered to be justified.

 

That is what he said. He said, Barclays told him that even after resolving the debit amount of around £738, my account is still in areas and that's why they haven't made any refund, and possibly (I am unsure) why the Cifas was registered. As I said, there is 100% absolutely no arrears, other than the charge back amount, which they said they are responsible for. If they cleared the charge back amount, which they promised to do, the account would have been in credit by the £150 compensation they said they had paid into the account (They didn't do this, I did a SAR with the bank and have all of the bank statements here) and the money in the account that belonged to me which was between £40 - £70.

 

I can't even get my head around what he and they are saying, and I am usually on the ball, but I cannot understand what is going on at the minute.

 

The adjudicator advised against me asking an Ombudsman to look at it as he said the bank might now refuse to accept responsibility for the charge back mistake, even though they had already accepted it was their error. But, he said this and I'm not confident at all that he even knows whats going on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just sent an email to the adjudicator that has dealt with this case. Just so I have some sort of paper trail, as suggested, and so we both know what is actually going on, because today it seems he has no idea what is going on. I also sent him a screenshot of the Barclays account on the Equifax site so he can see it is still delinquent.

 

Quote

 

Hi XXXXXXX.

 
There was some confusion today with regards to what Barclays have and haven't done and it's getting quite confusing so I want to clarify a few things.
 
On the 29th November, you emailed to let me know that Barclays have agreed with your solution and they would do the following.
 
  1. Accept responsibility for the failed charge back and clear the amount they said I owed them, which was the charge back amount of £778.00
  2. Pay £150 in compensation
  3. Make amendments to my credit file to reflect the fact that the debt amount had been cleared and the account is no longer delinquent
  4. Return the money I had in the bank account before any of this happened, which was £49.17 
You said on the phone that they had failed to complete some of these actions. 
 
They have completed none of these actions, they have done nothing of what you suggested, and what they agreed to do. None of the above has been done.
 
I have checked my Equifax credit file today, and I have attached a section of it which is the Barclays bank account. As you will see, they placed a delinquent notice on the account on the 30th May 2019. This is still there as of today. The delinquent account is in debit by £739. This is the charge back amount of £788, minus my own funds off £49.17, that I had in the account before they re-debited the charge back amount. So the charge back amount, minus my own funds leaves a debit balance of £739, this is as it is today.
 
You said in November, and again today, that they have already paid the £150 compensation. They have not. They did not pay that amount to me, and they have not taken it off the debt balance. They have not paid that £150 to me or the account.
 
They also have not returned my own money, which is the £49.17 that was in the account.
 
The CIFAS notice. This was placed on the account on the 30th May 2019. this is the exact day they closed the account and registered the delinquent account with Equifax. It is a CIFAS for 1st Party Fraud. They are saying I deliberately created a false charge back to obtain money from them fraudulently. As you now know, that did not happen because they admitted they made errors with the charge back I registered with them, but it is still there.
 
You made your decision at the end of November 2019, It is now 3 months later. They have done nothing. If they thought there was still an amount owing to them, which there is not, they should have either contacted you to let you know, or contacted me. They have done neither. So for the past 3 months I have had a delinquent account with Equifax for no reason, other than laziness on behalf of Barclays Bank.
 
I have also now had a CIFAS notice against my name for 9 months, for no reason whatsoever. This is an abuse of the CIFAS code of practice and extremely unfair on me. I have had no access to a bank account or a debit card for 9 months. Do you have any idea how difficult life is with none of these things, and none of this is my fault. It's the fault of Barclays Bank and its incompetent staff and for some reason they are still getting away with it and I really cannot understand how this is.
 
I hope this had made things clearer for you because whatever Barclays Bank are saying to you, it isn't correct. It sounds to me as if they really have no idea what they are talking about.
 
Best wishes.
 
XXXXXX.

 

 
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this fkofilee. I am happy to take legal action.

 

When it comes to the recovering of money, am I asking for the £150 compensation and the £49.17 I had in the account?

Should they be compensating for the unfair CIFAS, and the fact that it has been 3 months since they agreed to sort all of this out?

 

When the FOS said they were happy with the £150 compensation amount, none of us knew of the CIFAS and that is quite a big issue, plus the damage that has been caused by it upto November 2019, and the further damage caused in the past 3 months when all of it should have been removed?

 

Barclays sent paperwork to the FOS that stated I did have a strong case, but against Amazon, and this decision was made pre May 2019, so they are saying there was a case for a refund, yet issued that CIFAS at the end of May 2019 saying I had committed 1st Party Fraud.

 

they were saying I had a strong case which would mean they didn't suspect me of fraud, and then issued a CIFAS against me saying I have committed fraud.

 

That doesn't make sense does it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It really is confusing isn't it.

 

Barclays Bank admitted I had a valid refund claim, but not against them in May 2019.

 

Pre 30th May 2019 Barclays Bank admit I have a valid refund claim, but they felt it was against Amazon, and not them.

 

30th May 2019 Barclays Bank decide I have attempted to commit fraud against them by opening a charge back claim. They say I had no valid claim to initiate a charge back, and that I did it to fraudulently take money from them - So are saying the whole Amazon issue I reported to them was fake, and I did it because I knew Barclays Bank would immediately return that money into my account. This money was then used by me fraudulently, ie I spent it.

 

That is why they issued the CIFAS.

 

So on one hand they are saying I had a claim with Amazon, and on the other hand they are saying I made up the claim to defraud the bank.

 

They then later, admitted to the FOS that I did infact have a valid charge back claim with the bank which they failed to execute correctly and admit they made critical errors.

 

If you can understand this then well done, because I'm struggling and its me that's writing it.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a reply from Barclays Bank.

 

Quote

 

Dear Mr XXXXX

 

Thank you for your email addressed to Jes Staley, Matt Hammerstein and Michael Roemer. I am responding to you on their behalf and I’m sorry you’ve had cause to contact us again. Rest assured your concerns are being taken very seriously and have been passed to our dedicated Executive Complaints Team for investigation.

 

We will ensure a thorough review of the circumstances you outline is undertaken and we will arrange for you to be contacted by 26 February, if not before. In the meantime should you wish to contact the Executive Complaints Team, please telephone 0207 116 8012.

 

 

Barclays.co.uk/feedback

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have just had an email from the adjudicator.

Do I need to bother with them now?

Their input so far has been useless

 

. Is there a reason they want a copy of my full credit report also?

Mine is average like most people’s so it’s not an issue but not really any of his business

 

. I did tell him I had confirmation from Cifas and sent him a copy of the Cifas report but he seems to have not taken any notice because on the phone the other day he said he still didn’t think the Cifas is for that reason and it 1 million % is. 
 

Quote

 

Dear Mr 

 

Thank you for your email. I tried calling you earlier but was unable to get through to you.

 

I called Barclays earlier to chase them up on this issue. They’ve explained they received your letter and are currently looking into it for you.

 

I will discuss your case with my manager also, and will arrange a call sometime next week to give you an update.

 

In the meantime, can you send me a copy of your full credit report?

 

Kind regards

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, fkofilee said:

You have a DSAR from CIFAS - Have you sent that along too?


Yes I sent the whole of that to him on Monday as well. Both sides of the page. Again he took no notice. 
 

The default on equifax is dated 30th May 2019. The Cifas marker is dated 30th May 2019. He isn’t marrying the 2 together. 

Edited by Dazza75
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a voicemail today from the adjudicator that has been dealing with this case. He has asked me to call him to discuss my case further. Is there any need for me to do this? I know there is no harm in doing so, but I just can't see the point. He is never very clear on anything when I do speak to him, and doesn't really listen to what I say.

 

I have now contacted Barclays myself with the letter of intended action and their complaints team are getting back to me by this coming Wednesday, so I cannot see what speaking to the adjudicator would achieve.

 

I would have thought it is now out of his hands. He told Barclays in November what he would like them to do. They agreed, and then never did it. I have now gone to Barclays directly, so there is nothing he can say or do regarding that as its now up to Barclays to get back to me with a solution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barclays have emailed. Still not head from FOS but will keep tying.

 

Quote

 

Dear Mr XXXXX

 

Further to my colleague, Lisa xxxxx’ email on 21 February, I’d like to provide you with an update about your complaint.

 

I’ve passed your email onto our Legal Team who are now taking ownership of your case and will be in contact in due course.

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I emailed the FOS person as I keep missing him. His reply.

 

Quote

 

Dear Mr XXXXX

 

Thank you for updating me on the situation.

 

I should explain that you only needed to make a complaint about the CIFAS marker to Barclays to have the case investigated. In terms of the issue of Barclays not actioning my recommendations about the chargeback - this would’ve been dealt with separately.

 

But as you have provided them with a notice of legal proceedings, this means they have referred all the issues to their legal team.

 

This also means that we would no longer investigate. Our service wouldn’t continue with a case if the subject matter of the complaint is the subject of court proceedings.

 

Of course, its entirely your choice as to how you want to proceed, but I must make you aware of our position.

 

If you have any questions, please feel free to get in touch.

 

Best regards

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No contact details given for the legal team, and she said they will contact me in due course. That's it.

 

So are Barclays saying they want to fight this? Initially they accepted the findings of the FOS - agreed to carry out the recommendations, and then made up some excuse (3 months later) that there was this mysterious balance still owing on the account (I have all bank statements from the SAR request, there is no outstanding balance other than the charge back) however they did not inform me or anyone else of this fictitious amount and just did nothing. Further, you know if you owe a debt to a bank, wouldn't they normally chase you for it? I have had no correspondence with Barclays since April 2019. No debt recovery letters, nothing. They did once mention it would be sent to their collections department, and then onto debt recovery companies if not paid back, but none of this ever happened.

 

Also the Cifas marker - This was issued on the 30th May 2019. First party fraud, which is when you deliberately set out to defraud the bank.

 

Before the 30th May 2019 - In their notes shared with the FOS they admit I have a strong case, but against Amazon. They also admit that they made critical errors in relation to this charge back. If they are admitting I have a strong case, they cannot assume I have deliberately set out to commit fraud which would mean the Cifas marker was issued unlawfully and not following guidelines.

 

I sent the letter of action on 21st February, so I can commence further action on 6th March which is 2 weeks?

 

When they say their solicitors will contact me in due course, are they going to be looking into this case and will they see it is them that have done wrong, and are we just now going in for a fight?

 

I'm ready. I am 100% in the right here and I'm not scared of them.

 

 

Edited by Dazza75
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...