Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cabot backdoor CC for Newday Card - Now Warrant of control


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1885 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

There is no point in applying for an instalment order if you have no money to pay, and no point in applying to set aside if you don't have grounds to contest the CCJs. Were the debts statute barred?

 

Gather information about all of your debts and consider applying for a Debt Relief Order if you are eligible, this will write off all of your qualifying debts and you can forget about them. Although it will affect your creditworthiness for the next six years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

" There is no point in applying for an instalment order if you have no money to pay, and no point in applying to set aside if you don't have grounds to contest the CCJs "

 

The reason for the application is to convert it from Forthwith to Monthly and stay the current WOC also to stop further Bailiff attempts.The sooner the court are aware of the OPs financial situation the better.

 

Who mentioned anything about setting a side ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

There doesn't seem to be much point paying £50 to vary the order when Cloverfield has no disposable income to pay the debts of £8k plus in reasonable instalments each month. She doesn't own property, doesn't own a car as she uses her son's motability car, doesn't have disposable income over £50 a month so if the total debt is under £20,000, the £50 fee would pay more than half the £90 cost of a DRO.

 

Even if the order is varied, one missed payment can result in enforcement action starting all over again. It's just delaying the process for a while.

 

On ‎06‎/‎04‎/‎2019 at 18:23, Cloverfield said:

Also, my son has a Motability car that I'm registered to drive, can they take that?

 

Definitely not. They cannot take any motability cars.

Edited by Will Goodfellow
Link to post
Share on other sites

If she had no money wouldn't she be a candidate for fee remission under ex 160?

 

I agree about the sums available to her, the variation can also be used to report that she cannot afford to pay anything of course.

The point is to get the bailiff off her back if supported by evidence and a sworn statement the court may suspend execution completely.

 

 

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 09/04/2019 at 13:42, Cloverfield said:

I pay £50 per month to CT arrears so I'll list that in priority debts. 

 

I only have details of one CCJ (this one) and Northants couldn't tell me about the others as I don't have case/claim numbers. Does this mean I'll have to check my credit report? I've been reluctant to do that as it will definitely alert any other creditors to me, and so far they've just been fishing. Can I just sort out each CCJ as they crop up instead? At least I'll know what to do and how to fill in the forms.. I know you can bundle CCJ's together if they are less than £5k, but mine are over that amount. 

 

My head feels like it's going to explode!

2

Not sure what you mean by bundling together CCJs, could you clarify. 

 

Apparently, you can claim if your hubby brings home less than £545. a month. Don't count your allowance and mention your disabled son on the form, any problems, ring the court you are applying to.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

I read that you can include all CCJ's in one application - saving money on fees and making just one monthly payment. Irrelevant as total debt has to be below £5k.

 

Husband earns more than the threshold, so I didn't qualify for help with the fee.

 

I followed the advice given here and sent the form and fee last week. I got a call on yesterday to say that as soon as the cheque clears, the application will be processed. In the meantime, he said he would make sure that the bailiffs were aware my son was autistic and would ask them not to visit. I don't know if that will actually work, but that's what he said.

 

If my low monthly offer is accepted, I certainly won't miss a payment. I'm not destitute, I just don't want my husband to have to pay for my stupidity. I want only my income to be counted and the money payable to come from me.

 

Thanks again for the good advice.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest you would have been better off ringing the Bailiffs Office yourself and telling them you have submitted an application, they can then look out for it and in the majority of cases will put to one side until the application is heard.

  • Thanks 1

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Plodd, good sensible advice, as usual, I advised the same thing in post 9.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Cloverfield said:

 

I read that you can include all CCJ's in one application - saving money on fees and making just one monthly payment. Irrelevant as total debt has to be below £5k.

 

 

 

 

This is probably in relation to the second charge that bailiffs make, It can only be rendered when the debtor has not satisfactorily responded to the first notice and the bailiff calls at the property.

The Regulations state that this fee £235 should cover any other, simultaneous calls, for other debts that are on the bailiff's books.

 

Your priority is to ensure the offer you made in relation to the first notice you received is accepted, thus the second stage fee will not be due at all.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is County Court Bailiffs not HCEO..there is only one fee  £110.

 

https://www.gov.uk/make-court-claim-for-money/enforce-a-judgment

 

" I read that you can include all CCJ's in one application - saving money on fees and making just one monthly payment. Irrelevant as total debt has to be below £5k. "

 

Incorrect one CCJ per N245..you can bulk CCJs on to a Time Order/DRO/Bankruptcy 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

County Court Bailiffs  are salaried civil servants employed directly by the court service......there are no further fees PT 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Andyorch said:

This is County Court Bailiffs not HCEO..there is only one fee  £110.

 

https://www.gov.uk/make-court-claim-for-money/enforce-a-judgment

 

" I read that you can include all CCJ's in one application - saving money on fees and making just one monthly payment. Irrelevant as total debt has to be below £5k. "

 

Incorrect one CCJ per N245..you can bulk CCJs on to a Time Order/DRO/Bankruptcy 

1

Yes, and as said they are generally quite approachable, and being salaried has a lot to do with it. Sorry, I was referring to EAs.

I can't think of any other situation where you get two for one.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...