Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

TFL Freedom Pass misuse, charged under Byelaw 17(1)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1973 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I've lurked a little through some of the other freedom pass misuse threads but thought I'd make my own, sorry if you're tired of these.

 

Before I get into it, call me stupid (I am) but I really did not stop to think about where the money came from so people who need it can use freedom passes, what I was doing and how wrong it was, I only found out after doing some research and I feel extremely ashamed and disgusted at myself for this.

 

I completely admit what I did was wrong and if worst case scenario I am charged with it, I accept my faults and take responsibility.

However, if it can be helped I would really not like to hinder my future career, I really do not want this time of ignorance and foolishness to determine my future.

 

I was stopped by an inspector(?) on my way to my retail job who took my details,

I admitted it wasn't my card and I had taken it from my mother to avoid paying the fee and save money, and that I had done this more than this one time.

 

I then got a letter from TfL asking if I accept commiting the offence or not and any exceptional reasons, including evidence, as to why TfL should not proceed with a prosecution.

 

I replied with an email expressing my remose and accepting my actions and how foolish it was.

I explained why I did it, I was in a really difficult place with money which had been contributing to my depression so I had been using it to and from work, but I know this is no excuse and I know what I did was completely wrong.

 

I also explained the adverse impact it will have on my future career, and offer reasonable monetary sums equivalent to any related fines and administrative fees incurred by the company to settle out of court. The original email was a lot more thorough and remoseful but that is the main points I had, I'm happy to show the full email if necessary.

 

They did not reply to that email, but a few months later I recieved a letter inviting me to court.

It reads:

 

[NAME] You are required to appear on [DATE] at [TIME] before [X] Magistrates' Court at [X ADDRESS] to answer the following charge:

 

That you on [DATE OF OFFENCE] at Oxford Circus did enter a compulsory ticket area without having with you a valid ticket. Contrary to Byelaw 17(1) of the Transport for London Railway Byelaws made under paragraph 26 of Schedule 11 to the Greater London Authority Act 1999 and confirmed under section 67 of the Transport Act 1962.

 

[...]

 

On [DATE] [DEFENDANT] travelled from [sTATION] to Oxford Circus station. At 7:52am she produced a Disabled Persons Freedom Pass of high value that did not belong to her and was not valid for her to use. She admitted the pass belonged to her mum and that she was using it to save money. Further analysis of the recent usage of the pass showed an addition 48 journeys where fares totalling £237.40 has been avoided.

 

An application will be made in court for a £338 contributtion towards TfL...

 

I believe my case will be a difficult one considering the number of uses.

I hope to settle out of court and pay any fines, and if they decide not to I will attend the court and plead guilty and explain how sorry I am even if they do charge me.

 

Currently I am unsure what to do from here.

They did not reply to my initial email.

 

Should I be contacting the Investigations, Appeals and Proecutions team?

 

Should I plead guilty on the court letters I have recieved as soon as possible?

 

What exactly is Byelaw 17(1)?

 

will I be getting a criminal record, what are my possible outcomes?

 

I assume worst case is I get a criminal record, and best case is I settle out of court, but are there any other outcomes?

 

How much will any kind of record hinder my career, what kind of checks are done?

 

 

 

Thank you for taking the time to read and any advice will be greatly appreciated.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you both so much for the information.

The date of the court is early next month.

I understand I'm in a pretty bad position and I don't have much faith of being able to settle out of court but I will definitey try for the sake of my future.

I also did not know about the whole spent after a year thing, I will read more into this.

 

I was also wondering,

I will definitely attend the hearing but,

apart from being able to try settle out of court right before the hearing,

will there be much impact of my attending the hearing?

 

What difference will it make to the hearing if I plead guilty and do not attend than plead guilty and do attend?

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the advice dx.

 

I called up and told the lady on the phone I was extremely sorry and the impact it will have on my future but told me she wouldn't be able to settle out of court and they've been told to treat every case the same.

 

I asked if she recieved my email and she said they had and the person who reviewed it had decided to go ahead with the prosecution.

 

She said there was nothing she can do on her end (I felt like she probably could but didn't want to since I've read on other threads of people helping them over the phone)

 

. I asked if there was anyone else I could talk to and she said no. She said I could try writing again for a manager to review and I should state this in my letter.

 

I guess all I can do now is write to them again and call up constantly to get updates and hope I can change their mind.

 

If it comes down to going to court, which I will definitely attend, what difference will me pleading guilty at court make?

 

I will 100% get a criminal record if it does end up in court right?

 

Thanks.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update, I sent the second letter on Monday for next day delivery, they recieved it on Tuesday.

I called back today and the man on the phone told me there's been no update yet and I should call back on Monday next week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update!

 

I called and this very nice man picked up this time he was very helpful.

He told me apparently they have been told off by courts for doing settlements out of court for these kinds of cases, as it was for the courts to decide the case.

 

He said there isn't much I can do now apart from attend the hearing and ask the usher to speak to one of the TfL prosecutors before the case is heard, and bring any emails or letters that have been sent.

 

He also said bring any evidence of mitigating circumstances however I am not sure what fits as a mitigating circumstance, I do not think they will care about my financial struggle and mental health issues.

 

All I can do now is just wait for the hearing and accept what comes to me for my foolish actions.

 

I am going to send in the court letters to the court, should I write anything in the "statement the accused may wish to volunteer" section?

 

Also they have attached a copy of "schedule of offence(s) to be taken into consideration" with all my unpaid journies and a section for me to sign it.

I am confused if I should be signing these?

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

No worries I do not intend to lie was just confused.

 

I am wondering also if mentioning my depression in mitigating circumstances will be helpful at all?

Also if I should write anything in the "statement the accused may wish to volunteer"?

Will I need to attach my emails sent to TfL with the court letters?

 

Many thanks.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello! Another update. I've sent off all my court forms and everything.

 

I recieved a reply from TfL today. They said they were not persuaded to issue a warning on this occassion due to the extent of usage which is very understandable but sucks.

 

The letter also reads "You have been charged with one offence of being in a compulsory ticket area without a valid ticket. This is the lowest offence for which you could have been charged with, and there is no 'dishonest' element contained within the wording of the charge."

 

I am not quite sure what this means. At this point I feel there is nothing left to do than speak to the prosecutor on the day of court.

 

Thanks for your time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello!

 

Update who is wondering or also in a similar situation to mine, and is not sure what to expect.

 

I called again a few days before the hearing and TfL said they just do not settle out of court and have been told not to anymore.

 

Then it was the day of my hearing, I got there an hour early at opening time to speak to the TfL prosecutor, which apparently you have to talk to before you are heard anyway. I got to talk to the prosecutor and said I was very sorry, the impact it will have on my future and asked if there was any chance of settling out of court and he said unfortunately they could not do so, I feel like I should have maybe said more to the prosecutor but I'm not sure if it would've made a difference. He also said USUALLY with these kinds of offences they only stay on your record for a year.

 

After a few hours I had my hearing.

I have never been to a magistrates court before so I did not know what to expect.

The clerk told me they didn't receieve any of my court summons letters because they were having problems with post (which I believe not true as I had sent my letters guranteed and signed and tracking showed them delivered) so I had to fill in all the court forms again.

 

The magistrate who was speaking did not speak with a nice tone but this should be expected.

They asked what I was pleading, and why I did it.

I could not speak much out of anxiety, but I'm not sure it would've made a difference anyway, I just said I was very sorry and it was due to financial difficulty, nothing else about the circumstances I was in and anything about my mental health. If anything I recommend anyone going to court to prepare what they want to say before going into court, something short and to the point.

 

Honestly a lot of this part was a blur to me because I was so anxious and they almost make you feel like you've murdered someone (I did not expect them to be as harsh as they were). That being said I believe the offence I received for "not having a valid ticket" rather than anything to do with dishonesty was the best case scenario (obviously after settling out of court). They also gave me a £30 fine + court fees + TfL fees I evaded, I believe the fine was discounted due to my circumstances.

 

I have indeed learnt a lot from this and I'll finally be able to move forward in my life.

 

My advice to anyone in the same situation is, try to pester TfL as much as you can to settle out of court, write in and call them often to get updates. You can try settle out of court right up until before your actual hearing. I feel as they would have considered settling out of court for my case if it was not such a high usage on the pass. If you cannot settle out of court, then attend the court and plead guilty to get the "best" possible punishment.

 

I am waiting for the letters to arrive of my offence so I can research more about it, as I'm unsure how long this does stay with me.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...