Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Backdoor Asset/TM CCJ -old Lending Stream PDL - subject to IRL Complaint


CCJHell
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1977 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

" The date on the claim form is 10/10/2018, the date that is marked on the franking stamp on the envelope is 07/11/2018. I called the court and they advised I have received a judgement by default on 06/11/2018. "

 

So the claimant sat on the claim in the meantime whilst your 33 days was ticking away and then sent it to your new address......MCOL would not scratch out address and write in hand the correct address.

 

You may have recourse that this is a procedural error exasperated by the claimant in delaying service.

 

CPR 6.18

 

Notification of outcome of postal service by the court

6.18

 

(1) Where –

 

(a) the court serves the claim form by post; and

 

(b) the claim form is returned to the court,

 

the court will send notification to the claimant that the claim form has been returned.

 

(2) The claim form will be deemed to be served unless the address for the defendant on the claim form is not the relevant address for the purpose of rules 6.7 to 6.10.

 

And CPR 6.24

 

Change of address for service

6.24 Where the address for service of a party changes, that party must give notice in writing of the change as soon as it has taken place to the court and every other party.

 

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part06

 

So the claimant didnt advise MCOL...as stated sat on it and your time ran down..thje reason for the above CPR is so MCOL can reset the date.

 

Which then moves us to CPR 7

 

In the event that a claim form is returned to the claimant......

 

Extension of time for serving a claim form

7.6

 

(1) The claimant may apply for an order extending the period for compliance with rule 7.5.

 

(2) The general rule is that an application to extend the time for compliance with rule 7.5 must be made –

 

(a) within the period specified by rule 7.5; or

 

(b) where an order has been made under this rule, within the period for service specified by that order.

 

(3) If the claimant applies for an order to extend the time for compliance after the end of the period specified by rule 7.5 or by an order made under this rule, the court may make such an order only if –

 

(a) the court has failed to serve the claim form; or

 

(b) the claimant has taken all reasonable steps to comply with rule 7.5 but has been unable to do so; and

 

© in either case, the claimant has acted promptly in making the application.

 

(4) An application for an order extending the time for compliance with rule 7.5 –

 

(a) must be supported by evidence; and

 

(b) may be made without notice.

 

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part07#7.5

 

But the above would have cost a further application fee of £100.

 

Hope you get it sorted...but you are legally entitled to 33 days from receipt of a claim form if intending to defend.....whichever way you look at it.

 

Andy

  • Confused 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Furthermore I think you may be able to approach the claimant and ask they set it aside by Consent Order......given the nature and details of how they attained the Judgment...wont cost you anything then.

 

But you must have a viable defence ready...as they can simply reissue the claim again...and your back to square one.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No harm throwing it in but concentrate on service here......thats the key...use it as leverage with the claimant...you never know they may be prepared to set a side if a reasonable offer of a payment plan is agreed....and not reissue.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Responding to your PM

 

 

Your time line to deal with the claim would be from the date re issued or reserved..so from the 7th Nov you would have had 19 days to acknowledge service and a further 14 days to submit a defence (33 days) and your defence due date would have been Friday 7th Dec 2018

 

" I propose that you draft and submit a Consent Order to set aside this judgement.....at your cost "

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

You cant set a side a CCJ that has been settled...there is nothing to set a side.

 

So they didnt agree with the Consent Order ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...