Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Arrow/shoos Ordinary Civil Bill [NI] - old HBOS Card debt


BJ6605
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2200 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Don't be contacting Shoosmith at the minute tell your friend to sit on their hands

 

we have a bit of time yet

 

With an NI claim the claimant must attach all their evidence to the claim form

 

Can you post up redacted copies of everything that your friend has received?

 

From - https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/nireland/law-and-courts/legal-system/taking-legal-action/small-claims/small-claims-in-northern-ireland-ni/#h-starting-a-claim

 

In some circumstances, additional documents need to be attached to the particulars of claim. For example, if the claim is based on a written agreement, such as an agreement to purchase goods or services, a copy of the agreement should be attached to the statement of claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy, DX ive found under The County Court (Amendment) Rules (Northern Ireland) 2013 -

 

6. In Order 5 for rule 3 substitute—

 

“Notice for further particulars

 

3.—(1) In any case to which Rule 2(4) does not apply, the defendant may require the plaintiff, by notice in writing served within 14 days after service of the notice of intention to defend, to furnish further particulars of claim within 14 days of service of the notice for particulars.

 

(2) In any case to which Rule 2(4) does not apply, the plaintiff may require the defendant by notice in writing served within 14 days after service of the particulars of claim or where no notice for further particulars of claim has been served, within 14 days of service of the notice of intention to defend, to furnish particulars of any defence, set off or counterclaim within 14 days of service of the notice for particulars.

 

(3) Where under paragraphs (1) and (2) particulars have been duly required and—

 

(a)have not been furnished within the time specified in the notice; or

(b)if furnished, are in the opinion of the judge or district judge insufficient;

the judge or district judge may make such order as he thinks just including, in particular, an order that the proceedings be dismissed or, as the case may be, an order that the notice of intention to defend be struck out and judgment be entered accordingly.

 

From the unammended Rules, rule 2 ,4 states -

 

2.-(1) The plaintiff shall set out in his civil bill particulars of his claim

 

(4) A plaintiff suing for the recovery of a book or shop debt or other running account shall, unless such particulars ate adequately set out in the civil bill, furnish full particulars of his demand within a reasonable time before, or at the time of, the service of the civil bill; but the judge may dispense with this requirement if in any case he is satisfied that it is unnecessary.

 

 

I think this Rule is the equivalent of the CPR 31:14 that is used in E&W

 

I wouldn't have the knowledge of legal speak to be able to reference this in a letter to the claimant but maybe one of you can?

 

it seems that you can only request the documents after the claimant has served notice of his intention to defend.

 

it also appears that the claimant has 14 days to comply or else it can be struck out

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve had a look for a form 42 as well and can’t find it

 

I live in NI I will call into my local court and see if I can get one from the clerk

 

I’ll also ask a few questions about the process

 

If Andy or DX require any particular info please let m know

 

Jon

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, I finally got to the court today and unfortunately as Andy has suggest she advised that because it is a civil bill you would be best to get solicitor advice as the way it works over here is completely different and vastly more expensive if you lose in a civil bill case.

 

Sorry its not what everyone was looking for but she did say that if it was under £3000 it would have been a small claim and you would have been able to do it as a LiP

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah from what the clerk said you lodge your intention to defend and then then it gets listed for a hearing in the intervening time you can request the documentation from the claimants, it doesn't cost to request the docs because you sent it to the sole dierectly

 

it is when it goes to hearing you can state if the documents have been produced or not

 

the problem is, is if you loose the case you are liable for all the claimants costs and they can be quite high in NI

 

that is the reason it is recommended to get a solicitors advice on whether you have a realistic chance of winning

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with my nearest court, Laganside in Belfast, it is all done over the phone so you don’t get to see the person face to face

 

But to clarify what she said-

 

You submit intention to defend online

 

Request documents from claimant

 

If not received in 28 days you can ask the judge to enforce the disclosure of documents, there are 2 ways to do this 1 is free the other is £125

 

Once documents are disclosed then you can file defence

 

And case runs as per judges directions, eg statement hearings etc

It seem pretty similar to E&W fast track

 

It can end up pretty expensive if you loose but the problem here is we have no document to gauge the strength of this claim against

 

I think it may be an idea to submit intention to defend and request docs

 

Then see what we can do from there, if they have a solid case then could be the time to speak about a settlement offer

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...