Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Capquest/Erudio/Calls/Hassle/Texts...


mutilatedlip

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

I've been a silent reader of this excellent forum for some time now, but as of now I need a little help/friendly advice.

 

I had an old stlye SLC loan (pre-97) which I'd deferred for many, many years, moving address along the way.

 

Hadn't heard anything for years, then some Erudio letters arrived via an old address, which I ignored (not always the best course of action), and recently I've also received letters from Capquest who I gather are one and the same.

 

Alongside this, I've had calls/texts and have been harassed extensively. Occasionally, I've tried to engage in conversation, but I can't actually get through the data protection checks they ask for at the beginning of the site.

 

Usually, I'd just follow previous advice and ignore - as a lot of people here have done on here.

 

However, and this is where it gets weird. I was forwarded a letter dated last week from Capquest which I subsequently binned, and haven't actually spoken verbally to anyone about this.

 

This morning, my work phone rang, and a guy claiming to be from TM Legal was trying to get hold of me. How they got my work phone I have no idea and was quite taken aback. He asked to put me through security, and I refused as I was at work. (open plan office etc.).

 

Googling them reveals they are a legal firm based down South who deal with CCJs.

 

I checked my credit file, and did a search on the Trustorg site, and nothing is showing up.

 

I'm a bit confused, and have no other outstanding debt whatsoever.

 

What would you do? Would anybody advise sending Capquest/Erudio Statute barred letters?

 

Or just ignoring extensively. I'm pretty sure I've not spoken to them in six years, but I honestly can't recall the last time I sent deferral stuff. Could've been around 2012, but I'm really not sure of this. In addition, I've categorically NEVER spoken to Erudio direct.

 

Any advice would be very much appreciated.

 

 

Kind regards

M

Link to post
Share on other sites

TM Legal are nowt to do with Arrows group [capquest/erudio etc etc]

they chase Pay day loan debts.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Check your credit file

 

Someone could have used your details from mail to old houses because you didn't tell your old creditors you'd moved?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a member of the Experian site, and I regularly ensure all my details are up to date etc. and there are no rogue entries on there.

 

I've always kept creditors up to date. Just not the SLC.

 

Very peculiar. It was the only thing I could think of. I received a letter from Capquest last week saying they'd previously written to me (they certainly had not), but just binned it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh well whatever TM legal are upto remains a mystery.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmmm. Interesting.

 

Well I'm not getting through their security, and I'm loathe to discuss stuff on the phone.

 

I guess they'll have to put it in writing. My credit file is up to date, so my new address is on there if they're that desperate to search.

 

Thank you for your input.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its not a good idea to keep ringing people esp if its a DCA or their fake/tame solicitor?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed.

 

I was a little shocked when my desk phone at work went. That's quite a shocking and threatening move intent on intimidating.

 

Could be pure coincidence. They didn't take me through security anyway.

 

And surely any company ringing would try and send a letter. I'll just keep ignoring it and fail their security.

 

I've never once discussed anything regarding the SL over the phone, back with SLC and definitely not with Erudio. So many strange calls nowadays it's difficult to vet them all. Best option is play dumb via the phone. If anyone needs to contact, I'm sure they'll write.

 

All post is forwarded from previous addresses. I'm just not updating them with new details.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well if you are getting ALL post and quickly

then you should be ok

 

 

in claimform packs [no don't panic!!] that really need very quick intervention upon...

 

 

I recon someone has used your details somehow.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope not!

I'm pretty well covered

- I subscribe to the Experian service, and have web tracking etc. on all my details.

 

You know when you absolutely rack your brains but can't think of anything...

 

Have many people received CCJs following the Erudio/Capquest debacle?

 

I really cannot recall if I deferred back around 2012 or not.

I've never spoken to these people via the phone.

 

If I were to send an aggressively worded Statute Barred letter, as per the template, and demanding they no longer contact me, and add in I've never signed an agreement with Erudio,

 

do you think - were I to have actually deferred with SLC

- they'd have it together enough to be able to produce copies of my deferment letters?

 

Or should I just consider the 'if I don't hear within 21 days' as gospel, and completely ignore if this timescale passes?

Link to post
Share on other sites

there were a couple of what we now believe to be spoof threads elsewhere

that claimed to have gotten claimforms from erudio regarding SLC loans that they bought in that mass Gov't sale..

 

 

..but they were later bebunked as they refused to actually post up any proof

and a search of the relevant court records found no such cases.

 

 

erudio would shout it loud if they had ever gotten any, but ive not heard anything in recent years now since the govt sale.

 

 

id let things run.

 

 

its not ever a good idea to invite letter tennis by sending any letters

even if a debt IS statute barred.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

its not ever a good idea to invite letter tennis by sending any letters

even if a debt IS statute barred.

 

 

dx

 

Wise information.

 

I read all the other threads, and did notice the lack of actual evidence pertaining to real letters of CCJs being issued by them.

 

The guy that contacted me yesterday didn't ring back, and nor did previous Capquest callers.

 

I think your 'next job next agent' style perception of them sounds pretty much spot-on.

 

Annoyingly, we're looking at 300,000 people. Shame we couldn't all protest and just stop communicating with them. They'd never manage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi All

 

I received a random text from Capquest providing me with a link to a letter that was 'awaiting' me.

 

I deleted it and didn't click, but if you click on it, I'm pretty sure they could count this as you having read the letter.

 

Just a heads-up. This is the first contact I've had since this thread started a couple of months ago.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope doesn't work like that

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...