Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Last June, 3.4m members received a £100 payment from the building society. Now they will be wondering whether the offer will be replicated this year.View the full article
    • Write to the IPC complaining that UKPC have not observed the requirements of PoFA . IPC  Waterside House, Macclesfield SK10 9NR Dear IPC, I am writing to complain about a serious breach of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 by UKPCM. I feel that as it is more a breach of the Act rather than not just  complying with your Code of Practice which is why I am bypassing your operator. Should you decide to insist that I first complain to your operator, I will instead pass over my complaint to the ICO and the DVLA . My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA. You will be aware that this is not the first time that UKPC have fallen foul of the DVLA and presumably yourselves. I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPC to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I would think that should be sufficient for the IPC to cancel your PCN though  you should await comments from the Site team before sending your complaint. Don't forget to include both PCNs.  
    • Hi DX, Sorry, fell asleep as I was up all night last night writing that statement. Yes, I attached the rest of the witness statement on post 50, bottom of webpage 2. That's the important part.  It looks like the lawyer who wrote Erudio's Witness statement does not work for them any more. So, I'll have another lawyer representing instead. Not sure if I can use Andy's hearsay argument verbally if that happens.... I did not put it in writing. Apart from not sending deferral forms, my main argument is that in 2014 Erudio fixed some arrears mistake that SLC made and then in 2018 they did the same mistake, sent me confusing letters. What is the legal defence when they send you confusing material?
    • Chinese firm MineOne Partners has been ordered to sell land it owns near a US nuclear missile site.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Very difficult


shoe_junkie
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6388 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

Me and a friend have had an ongoing problem, basically when we lived together we got a joint account, but when she moved out and I lost my job I ran up £700 worth of charges on the account and both that an my other account which was £1,700 overdrawn were closed with defaults etc.

 

Anyway the problem is the debt for the joint account has gone to Wescot just in my ex flatmates name and my debt including the joint account has gone to another agency but when I called them they told me its now gone to Wescot also.

 

So I called Wescot to say that I won't pay both mine and my ex flat mates debt as then I will be paying the joint account twice. Now 2 problems they don't have any records for me and the joint debt is only in her name!!

 

I've spoken to NatWest who the origional debt was with, but they were unhelpful and my ex flatmate is getting very upset! I don't know whats happened to my debt and I'm reluctant to pay this debt off in her name as when my debt re-appears, which I'm sure it will they will ask me to pay it again!

 

Any advice appreciated!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

OOhh the lovely Wescot again. There are many threads regarding Wescot and I advise you have a look.

 

The first piece of advice I can give you is stop communicating with the DCA (debt collection agency) by telephone. Communicate to them via letter. The reason for this is if you have to go to court you can prove to a judge what has been communicated as it is written down.

 

Has Westcot bought the debt or are they just acting as Natwests representatives?

 

Were you sent notification of the defaults?

 

You say that you aren't going to pay your X flatmates debt but you must remember that you are both jointly liable for the joint account. It sounds to me as if Westcot have been doing a fishing exercise and seeing who would respond first.

 

My bank account went to Westcot you can read the posts. Westcot

 

What I did was send Bank of Scotland a subject access request with a postal order for £10. They then sent back all my bank statements so I could count up how much I had been charged for the past 6 years.

 

You must do this unless you have all the bank statements so you can see exactly how much you owe and work this out with your friend if she owes anything and to see if the dCA has added any charges. (and I have just read some of your other posts so it seems your on the right track!!!!)

 

I sent Westcot this letter

 

Re: − Account/Reference Number xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

 

 

 

I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT TO YOUR COMPANY. I require you to supply the following documentation before I will correspond further on this matter.

 

1. You must supply me with a true copy of the alleged agreement you refer to. This is my right under your obligation to supply a copy of the agreement under the legislation contained within s.78 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 (s.77 (1) for fixed sum credit) - your obligation also extends to providing a statement of account. I enclose a £1 postal order in payment of the statutory fee, PO Serial Number ……………………..

 

2. A signed true copy of the deed of assignment of the above referenced agreement that you allege exists.

 

3. You are notified that you are obliged to supply these documents, whether you are the original creditor or not under S189 of the CCA 1974.

 

Non-compliance with my request is a criminal offence under the above Act and will result in a report being submitted to the relevant statutory authorities.

 

As you are aware, a credit agreement that is not properly documented and signed by the customer is totally unenforceable under the CCA and therefore is a complete defence to any court claim that is issued.

 

Take note at this stage, that any legal action you may contemplate will be both vigorously defended and contested.

 

This will get them off your back for a while and they can't demand money because the account is in dispute. They must provide the documents within 14days or they have defaulted and the debt becomes unenforceable they then have a further 30 days to provide the documents. If they don't provide them within this timeframe they have committed a criminal act and you can report them to trading standards.(hope this is right!!)

 

I have decided in my case to claim back all the bank charges for the account and then write to Bank of Scotland asking them for a reduced settlement figure. I can only hope!!!

 

You will need to discuss this with your friend and work out how much you owe each. Bearing in mind you can claim back the charges that have been administered to the account over the past 6 years. I strongly advise you to do a lot of reading in the FAQS on the site.

 

It is not a quick process but stick to it.

17/4 Sent CCA Request to Cabot - Argos/Cabot

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kellyplanet, Thanks for the reply.

 

I don't remember the bank sending me a letter informing me of a default, but It does say Default notice on my last statements, but at the time I was burrying my head in the sand and pretending I didn't have any debt.

 

I am already in the process of claiming back £1,700 in bank charges and like you i think after this I will ask for a reduced settlement.

 

I'm not sure if it would be worth sending the CCA, and what happens after, I'm really confused about this, I'm not sure if the debt was sold or if they are representatives either.

 

I ran up the debt myself and my ex flatmate wasn't involved and now it onlt seems to be in her name, and I just KNOW as soon as I pay it back in HER name my debt will re-appear and they'll hassle me to pay it too!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason I said send the letter to Westcot it will give you time to get things sorted with your bank charges without the stress of telephone calls and demand letters, and possibly contact NatWest for a reduced settlement figure. It will (should) also give you the original credit agreement with both your names on.

 

They shouldn't hassle you to pay another debt once it has been paid.The reason I say this is the account will be paid off. If you look at the Wescot letter the ref number should be the same as the account that is in debt.

 

I think Wescot are acting as representatives and they have just used the name that was first on the account. Once it is paid they shouldn't hassle you for it as you will have proof that it is paid (if they know whats good for em)

17/4 Sent CCA Request to Cabot - Argos/Cabot

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...