Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi All. A family friends car was having issues when she was on a trip visiting family up north at the begining of January.  She ended up leaving it at my friends garage in the same location, who parked it on his forecourt to investigate the issue, howver he said most likely it is beyond economical repair as its a serious gearbox fault. In the meantime i replaced her car with one of my spare cars. The insurance on the car then expired in at the end of January.  When the insurance expired, I sent a paper V890 paper as i didnt have her V5 Reference number in hand to do it online (i have a copy of this).  She didnt mention she hadnt recieved any confirmation as she didnt know if she would get one.  She then cancelled her road tax at the end of March (i think) as she was paying by DD. She then was travelling up north so didnt get her ,ail until last week. She recievd a letter dated 09/04/2024 stating she had failed to insure the vehcile and there was a £100 fine which could be reduced to £50 if she respons by 11/05/2024.  As soon as we noticed, i got her to dig  out the V5 and SORN'd the vehicle.   My friend has been a bit slow in checking the fault, however i suspect it will still be scrapped and is still on his forecourt. Is this possible to appeal?
    • worthy to not forget Just to let you know this bunch Kensington have been fined £1.225m by the financial regulator for treating borrowers who were in arrears unfairly. Claim those charges back plus the interest and tell them not to add any more to the account. There are a few news stories here you can get the info for a letter to send to them. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8615870.stm  
    • Hi All. I went to visit a family friend in Rochdale on a new housing estate opposite a old row of houses. The location is Royle Road, Postcode OL11 3PE. I was originally parked in parking bays outside the old houses, then moved the car, when I noticed my tyre was flat, so parked on what looked like double yellows to use his air pump to check and inflate the tyres before we left the house.   In the time i went inside to sort the pump and power supply i got a PCN.  The tyre then got changed (has a puncture) and we left. PCN Number:         RE######## Date:             04/05/2024 Time:             20:36 Observation:         20:34 to 20:36 Reported location:     Royle Park Road Reason:        Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (Code: 01) I believe this PCN is not correct and has grounds to appeal: 1. My friend who moved into the property around 6 months ago, swears that even though it has old double yellows marked, they are not current or council marked.   He said the property development company had said they had marked them for ease of access during development. 2. The road i was parked on was Royle Road.  The PCN was issued for Royle Park Road, which is about 400 yards up the road. 3. There are no sign posts or marking showing parking  restriction hours in the entire area (there maybe on Royle park Road). I have attached a map of the Location where i parked as a red dot. I have 2 questions: a.  Is there a way to check where double yellow lines are marked on some register to check if they are current? b. Can my grounds of appeal simply be, wrong location, wrong offence? Thanks in advance. Map_20240505.pdf
    • you made it very confusing, though i doubt any of it was ever read by the delivery franchise for DPD. your saving grace might well be you didn't select your own address (though if you are all the same postcode..??) and neither mentioned a safe space other than another neighbour. but with the actual delivery address on the parcel, it appears the driver had a choice of 3 addresses, all under the same post code with differing house numbers. so chose the label one but left it on your doorstep. play it carefully and along with the photo and the retailers requirement you should be ok.   dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

GWM vs Halifax


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6564 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been a Halifax customer for 15-20 years, and since they became a bank they have noticeably got worse. Hopefully the more of us who go through with this the more they might sit up and take note. Although I'm not holding my breath on that one.

 

Request for repaymet letter sent recorded delivery today (16/03/06) for last 6 years totalling circa £3100 (includes interest). Haven't worked through other my accounts yet, but will be doing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Technically from the date of the letter, but as you have proof that it has not been delivered, I think you should do another and either take to your local branch - they will give you a receipt if you ask for it, or send Special Delivery. Recorded Delivery is not a secure delivery system.

The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advise should further letters be needed. Instead of posting again I have faxed to the Customer Care department (Fax Nr 0113 285 1170) with a request to meet the original dates laid down in my letter, as would be expected from an organisation of there size.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since reading posts by gemah82 and the response by rivendale0506, I have drafted a letter which might mitigate the banks argument which I intend sending, as I have sent my 1st request already. I’ll wait a couple of hours before I fax, in case a comment is placed regarding the legal argument of delayed requests after making claims.

 

Letter reads:

XXth XXXXX 200X

BY FAX

Customer Care Fax Nr: 0113 285 1170

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Data Protection Act disclosure request

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: XXXXXXXX

SORT CODE XX XX XX

 

I have recently made a request for Repayment of Charges dated XX XXXXX 200X levied against my account with regard to direct debit / cheque payments in that they have been unlawfully at Common Law, Statute and recent Consumer regulations levied against me.

 

I have my previous six years worth of Statements noting the charges relating to my bank account. Where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any member of your staff or any other person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my banking business with you. There are no items identified as manual interventions which you may have made constituting such a charge, noted on my statements.

 

If you are unable to supply data relating to manual intervention because there has been no such manual intervention then will you please be kind enough as to confirm this in your response to this request. You have 40 days in which to comply, but this will be running in parallel to the letter noted above.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

Only time will tell if this works.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
No DPA as had statements.

First letter sent 16th March.

Absolutely no response from Halifax.

Letter before action faxed to Customer Relations Team this morning (30th March) and will also put in post later today.

 

Claim now £2,783 + interest (£3,232.80)

 

Just called Halifax to request confirmation that letters received.

 

Call lasted 27 minutes

 

1st contact couldn't locate copies of my faxes.

Eventually located 1st letter but not 2nd (LBA)

Tried to put me through to branch who they said had forwarded, but I haven't been through branch, which I finally mangaged to explain.

Tried to send me through to Customer Relations Team (CRT) but went to Bank Accounts.

Bank Accounts sent me to CRT

CRT advised ALL letters sent to Service Recovery (SR)

CRT said they would discuss with SR if I would hold. OK

End up transfered to SR.

SR said letter sent to CRT today to review. Said letter had been faxed to SR in Glasgow. Wrong. I faxed to Halifax code, which SR then accepted when I told them code faxed to. SR didn't know why CRT had forwarded to SR.

SR said letter being sent to me tonight confirming letter sent to CRT to review (even though they had just told me), but will contain contact details.

Also SR said it would not probably be reviewed by the deadline I had set Before Action.

Oh Well looks like another case will be landing in Bankfodders PM on 15/16th April.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received a fairly standard letter, thank you, we are sorry, we are keen to deal with your concerns, enclosed leaflet etc. etc.

 

Anyway called the number in the letter quoting my complaint reference and was told that all complaints are dealt with chronologically, and can take upto 8 weeks??? to hear back. Time for them runs out on Good Friday then its onto Moneyclaim to commence court case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest blindman

Just a point.

 

The MCOL summons is only issued on the day the court is open if you get the claim in before 09:00.

Court (I assume) will be shut from Thursday 16:00 until Tuesday 09:00.

 

I would suggest you file the claim on THURSDAY 13th April BEFORE 09:00 as it will then be issued on that day and they have 5+14 days from then.

 

Puts you in the driving seat, otherwise you will lose 4 days.

 

You can fill the claim form in at anytime on MCOL and save it for later.

So you could spend the time from now compiling the form (the 1080 character limit -or 24 lines -is a real pain) and then submit it after 16:00 on the Wednesday night.

 

I'm sure the court (were it to go that far) would not really complain that you submitted your claim one day earlier than you said...

 

Go for it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Claim issued today (13th April). Nice post for somebody to open on Tuesday after a long weekend. See Litigation in progress.

 

Now I'll just sit tight and wait to see what they do next.

 

PS. without starting a new thread, how do I change the first heading, as I'm well past first letter sent now.

 

???

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received notice of my claim this morning from MCOL and also a letter from the Halifax offering £250 against my claim for £3275, which I will obviously refuse as final settlement. I haven't read through the letter fully yet as it arrived as I was leaving for work this morning.

 

Is there a wrong way or a right way to proceed from here on.

 

Link to my original thread (couldn't change title and I'm well past the stage in the title) - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=1841

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest blindman

IMHO

As you have started claim proceedings (well done!) I'd ring the Halifax contact that was on the derisory offer letter and tell them that you'll drop the case if they pay you in full.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that. I only live 5 minutes drive from work, so can fortunately nip home for lunch. I will read through the letter first and then give them a call. I'll post some notes of the conversation and how it went this afternoon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont tell them that you will drop the case....if you have submitted claim to court, follow it through. There is nothing to stop them from withdrawing offer if you drop the case, at least if you follow through claim properly you have a guarantee you will get the money

IF YOU FEEL I HAVE HELPED YOU IN REPLYING TO YOUR POST, CAN YOU CLICK ON THE SCALES AND LET ME KNOW

 

Halifax - Total £2116 - Plus approx £300 in interest plus fees for 3 small claims...settled all within 3 weeks of claim.....Now for the mortgage.....

Clydesdale Bank - Credit Card - Sent Data Protection Act - Awaiting statements

Clydesdale Bank - Current Account - Awaiting statements

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest blindman

Obviously you don't drop the case until they've paid you :rolleyes:

 

I wouldn't be surprised if the letter starts "I tried to call to discuss your complaint but you weren't available to take my call"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blindman yes it did say as expected "I tried to call you ... ..."

 

Update as promised;

 

1. Called 01422 333465 (Customer Relations) but was engaged for over 30mins??

2. Finally got through to CR, but not Manager on the letter using 08457 253519.

3. Asked what letter was responding to whether my 1st request, LBA or court claim, answer was don't know which letter but was to a letter (letter dated 3 days after end of LBA time limit), no detail of court claim yet on file (Copy Notice of Issue states deemed to be served on 18th April.

4. When was phone call? record of call made 17th April (BH monday?) but no record of number called (what a suprise, no record of call received at home i.e. no message left).

5. I advised I would not be accepting amount, but would require repayment in full.

6. As claim not yet on record CR couldn't do any more, but will make note of call and my advise that not accepting offer and require repayment in full.

7. Advised by CR that a CR Mgr will contact me in due course via phone or letter. I gave 3 contact tel. numbers so no excuse not to (home, work & mobile).

 

Halifax has until 2nd May to reply to Court Notice. Time now to just sit and wait for response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest blindman

Glad you asked them when they called, who is this mystery (non) caller?

 

If you back onto MCOL you can see if the claim has been Acknowledged, this gives them a total of 28 days to respond.

Link to post
Share on other sites

FAX just sent to Customer Relations Team.

 

Thank you for your letter dated 17th April 2006, as the above reference Nr. in response to my letter (titled Letter Before Action) dated 30th March 2006, and my subsequent telephone conversation with your Helen Sutcliffe of today’s date.

 

I wish to reiterate my conversation in that I do not accept your offer of £250.00 as a full and final settlement, but will in this instance accept this amount as an interim payment, (made payable to the account detail above) against the full amount requested. Please be advised I still request the full amount as final settlement as requested in my letters dated 16th March 2006, and 30th March 2006.

 

Not withstanding my comments previously, that I am shocked that you have operated my account in this way I had always placed my confidence in your integrity and expertise as my fiduciary. You will now have received a notice from Northampton County Court whereby I have applied to retrieve the full amounts owing including all and any interests and court fees.

 

I trust you will respond to the above, and look forward to such a response. Would you please advise when this interim payment will be made to my account.

 

Please also note I will copy this letter to the court as your letter has been received after the date my claim is deemed to have been served.

 

Lets see what they do now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received a letter from legal services querying my MCOL. I put in the claim an amount for overdraft interest, but didn't specify the amount as it can't be calculated.

 

They refer me to Rule 16.4 (1)(a) of the Civil Procedure Rules, which I have read on line, and they are right in there query. They have given me 7 days to respond.

 

But what is the best way to proceed, so not to damage my case??

 

Has any else received one?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: my letter about £250 refund, I have just had a letter back saying they offered me six months back (£250 isn't last 6 months worth??) and that I refused (if you read the letter i didn't) and that they are not prepared to refund all charges incurred. Then refers me to Financial Ombudsman.

 

I think it was Ant & Dec that sang - lets get ready ready, lets get ready ready, lets get ready to rumble.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6564 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...