Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Rights on Refund Item


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3171 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

As a small family run hotel and bar business who have been trading for 7 years. A key card encoder which we use on a daily basis for the hotel had recently stopped working, it's fixated in the same position and plugged in by a USB port into a laptop.

 

 

The encoder was showing no life and when unplugged and replugged back into the USB port it began to give off a smokey smell as if there was a loose connection within the encoder.

 

 

From this we contacted the seller (NSP Security). We had only purchased this encoder in February. Previous to this we had the same encoder for 6 years and had no issues, the encoders have been used in exactly the same way.

 

 

Upon contacting them they refused to offer us a replacement even though we needed this on a daily basis loosing trade within our hotel. What they did offer was us to purchase a new encoder costing £575.00 and for us to send back the failed encoder and if they found a fault they would refund the money (£575.00) back to us.

We trusted the company as we have traded with them for a number of years, and were willing to do this as we were 100% sure we had no misused the encoder nor was it down to us the user.

 

 

NSP Security then came back to us with a report claiming we had damaged the encoder and have misused the device.

 

 

As previously mentioned the encoder is in a fixated position and under no reason have or would we want to damage the device as we rely on the encoder daily.

 

 

They have refused to refund us the money for the encoder/replace the device.

 

 

I would appreciate any ideas moving forward.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who has the encoder at this moment as it is your property?

 

You will need to get this encoder independently tested to take this further at you own expense which you can claim back if their report is in error through the county court if necessary

 

In what way are they saying you damaged it?

 

Did you report the fault in the first six months of purchase?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The company has the encoder as this point in time.

 

 

They are claiming it has been vandalised or misused in some way and had an impact to it severe enough to have dislodged some of the internal components.

We as a business rely on the device functioning correctly in order to operate our business and service, therefore it would be entirely illogical and counter productive to in any way damage or impede our ability to carry out our vital daily business activities and services.

The fault only development on the 29th September after purchasing the product in February.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then you need to ask that the alleged faulty encoder be returned to you

 

You then have to have it independently tested at your expense

 

I might be a good idea to ask rival companies who do simmilar products f they will do the test. As long as it is a major player in the door encoder field. Ask them how much they will charge for fault report and be honest as to why you want the report. They might be more linient on the charge for the report

 

If that report then backs up what they are saying you have problems, if not then a 14 day letter before action and a county court claim for redress

 

But you can do nothing without an independent report

Edited by obiter dictum
Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the USB port in your laptop work with other devices - ie a memory stick? Be careful - it may fry anything plugged in.

 

USB ports can be fragile things and even 5v @500ma (more for USB3) can seriously fry things plugged into it.

Another common issue is picking laptops up via one hand on one side with devices in the port which get levered against the table when the laptop is lifted unevenly, sometines shorting the USB pins in either the port or device,

 

Just some suggestions as to what can occur for you to look at.

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

 “Do I want to spend every Friday for the next five years in Clacton?”

Farage, Feb 2024 talking smack about the Peninsula town

.. before he decided he wanted their votes

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...