Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

gashton v Natwest


gashton
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6324 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have recently contacted the customer services department at Natwest Credit Card Services requesting copies of my Natwest Mastercard and Visa Card statements. Both these accounts are now closed and settled in full.

 

The person i spoke to stated they would request copies of my statements and send them free of charge. Since then this person has contacted my home and stated that if i require copies of these statements i will have to submit a written request and also pay £3 per statement.

 

Can anyone advise what the best way to go about this is and is there anyway i gain access to my statement info without paying £3 per statement.

 

Many thanks in advance

 

Gary

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I havent got it on me at the moment, but if you look at any letter that you have received from them - it will be in small print on the botton of the letter head.

 

It actually says Registered address.

HTH

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Natwest have recently accepted my request of a full refund on my joint account. Hooray!

 

The letter states 'Acceptance by you of this payment will be in full and final settlement of all claims you may have relating to our charges'.

 

Whilst i'm obviously going to make every effort not to be charged again on this account, I cannot predict what may happen in the future.

 

Can anyone advise whether Natwest will remove this condition if I reject the offer based on this particular condition of the settlement?

 

And if so, is there a letter template which someone has already used succesfully?

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

you have to sign this to get your offer

 

there is a dispute, that even if you sign this, you can claim for future charges

-----------------------------------------------

Mortgage Express charges- settled in full after issuing claim

 

------------------------------------------------

To view the FAQ'S click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/

To view the PRELIM letter click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/516-1-data-protection-act.html

To view the Letter Before Action click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/92-3-letter-before-action.html

To find Registered Address:

http://www.esd.informationcommissioner.gov.uk/esd/search.asp

 

 

If my advise helps click here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/reputation.php?p=366404

Link to post
Share on other sites

NatWest have recently accepted my request of a full refund on my joint account. Hooray!

 

The letter states 'Acceptance by you of this payment will be in full and final settlement of all claims you may have relating to our charges'.

 

Whilst i'm obviously going to make every effort not to be charged again on this account, I cannot predict what may happen in the future.

 

Can anyone advise whether Natwest will remove this condition if I reject the offer based on this particular condition of the settlement?

 

And if so, is there a letter template which someone has already used succesfully?

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated

 

Cross out the bits you don't like sign and keep a copy.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advice required please.

 

I recently rejecting Natwests full refund of £177 because of the terms & conditions that i had to agree too. Natwest has stated that unless i sign the letter accepting the T&C's i will not get the refund.

 

What is the next step for me? If i sign the letter does this mean i will not be able to claim back for any future charges on this account?

 

Should i progress to the stage of raising a court case against them?

 

Thanks in advance

 

Gaz

Link to post
Share on other sites

Signing for this amount will not stop you from claiming again in the future, so long as that claim does not relate to charges which have occurred before now (i.e. you can claim any charges from the date of this settlement onwards, no matter what they say in the offer letter.)

 

THREADS MERGED.

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

They'll almost certainly enter a defense today although this won't neccessarily show up on the website until tomorrow.

 

After that, the court will send you both an allocation questionnaire in order for the judge to decide where your claim will be heard i.e. small-claims, fast track etc...

 

Also, expect a letter from Cobbetts shortly asking for further info on your claim under CPR Part 18 - There's a sticky thread on this which I suggest you read carefully.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy,

 

Checked the website today and they have now entered a defence. Guess i've got to sit tight now and wait for the AQ and CPR 18.

 

I will look at the relevant threads today. Thanks for your advice

 

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have now recieved a Defence and a CPR Part 18 request from Cobbetts on behalf of Natwest. Am i correct in thinking that there is no reason for me to respond to this CPR request unless the court requests it?

 

If so - can anyone advise where to find the relevant letter template to reject this request and move my case on to the next step.

 

Thank in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are indeed.....although my head is seriously hurting due to my over indulgence of celebrating...LOL

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Section G - Other information:-

 

I am respectfully requesting that my claim be allocated to the small claims track.

 

This issue is not a complicated one; it is an issue of fact and not of law. The issue is only whether the money levied by the Defendant in respect of its customer’s contractual breaches exceed their actual costs incurred. I am happy to pay their actual costs and I am surprised the Defendant did not counterclaim for these, because I would have paid them without argument.

 

However, the continuing problem is, (in common with the 100s of other cases currently being brought by other bank customers), that the banks refuse to reveal the details of their penalty-charging regime. As the banks have a fiduciary duty towards their customers, they have a duty to deal straightforwardly and in utmost good faith.

 

Accordingly, I would respectfully ask that the court in this case, not withstanding allocation to the small claims track, order standard disclosure. I understand that it is in the courts discretion to do so. This would bring a rapid end, not only to this litigation, but would also likely bring an end to much of the litigation in progress against other high-street banks.

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I have finally recieved a letter from courts stating that a preliminary hearing has been set to decide how to proceed with my case for the 31st May 2007 - over 3 months away.

 

Can anyone confirm whether this is standard procedure?

 

If so - is it now i need to prepare my court bundle for myself, the courts and solicitor.

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gashton,

 

I'm not sure whether the bundle will be required for a prelim hearing but it definitely wouldn't hurt your chances to have it ready just in case. At the very least, if you get it out of the way then there really isn't much else for you to do apart from wait.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...