Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Need advice on unsatisfactory management company


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3230 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I'm new to this so please bear with me!

 

I own an apartment with my husband within a 100+ apartment building. We are managed by Rendall and Rittner and I am having nothing but problems with them.

 

First of all we are charged an obscene amount of money by them and do not see any changes in the building.

 

My first issue with them is their lack of communication, I have made several email and verbal complaints and they do not reply for weeks or just fob me off.

 

My building in total pay £7,200 a year to have the windows cleaned twice!! The window cleaners need to rent a cherry picker as we don't have suitable things attached to the building for them to use but £7,200 is a hell of a lot of money! The first window clean I had this year in March was awful so I sent pictures to R&R and I was told they would contact the window cleaner again to redo them. They have have still not been redone and R&R will not respond to me about it. I'm not happy that I'm Still paying full price for a service that wasn't done properly.

 

Second issue is that in the buildings lease contact it states no animals are allowed, yet there are many apartments with animals and unfortunately some owners allow their dogs to deficate in the communal corridors, lifts and entrance doors and do not clean up after them - this is left for the cleaners to do which they are not responsible for as the building should have animals in. I have complained about this to R&R and have been asked to give them apartment numbers for people with dogs!!! Why should I do this? We have CCTV through the buildings and they have said they don't have the time to look through the footage to find where the owners live! My thoughts are that the CCTV doesn't work!! Any advice on this will be greatly appreciated as I have had enough!

 

We have one meeting a year with R&R but nothing ever comes from it. We don't receive any letters letting us know what they are doing with our money and you see no changes around the building.

 

The building manager is meant to come out one day a week to look around and check things but he hasn't been here for months.

Thanks in advance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are entitled to have a breakdown of the management charges to see where the money has been spent. Many service charges include a sinking fund to pay for works programmed to be done in the future like repainting the outside of the building. This should be kept to a minimum needed to do the programmed works. If the charges are excessive you can go to the Leasehold Tribunal to get a ruling on the fairness of the charges. It would be better to speak to other owners of the flast and try and get a majority of peopel to agree at a meeting to either take over the management of the block or at least give these people the boot and employ someone else. It will take a bit of effort as many people cant be bothered but woth it in the long run. You could even buy the freehold of the block as a commonhold.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are right, tenants will have no say whatsoever, they will have to rely on absentee landlord doing the right thing and if it isnt costing them money many arent bothered.. Rule changes for leaseholder association can be forced through but it needs a couple of people top be really on the ball when it comes to making the alternatives attractive as most people cannot be bothered to do things for themselves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi,

 

I'm new to this so please bear with me!

 

I own an apartment with my husband within a 100+ apartment building. We are managed by Rendall and Rittner and I am having nothing but problems with them.

I assume this is a leasehold property ?

 

First of all we are charged an obscene amount of money by them and do not see any changes in the building.

 

Remember that Service Charges are only to recoup what the landlord/freeholder has actually spent/incurred, no more, no less...these amounts can be disputed at an FTT (previously LVT) court.

My first issue with them is their lack of communication, I have made several email and verbal complaints and they do not reply for weeks or just fob me off.

 

There is no legal obligation to communicate, but the RICS code which LL/FHs are supposed to follow does say they should, see here > http://www.leaseholdlife.info/reports/Rics_Code.pdf

 

My building in total pay £7,200 a year to have the windows cleaned twice!! The window cleaners need to rent a cherry picker as we don't have suitable things attached to the building for them to use but £7,200 is a hell of a lot of money! The first window clean I had this year in March was awful so I sent pictures to R&R and I was told they would contact the window cleaner again to redo them. They have have still not been redone and R&R will not respond to me about it. I'm not happy that I'm Still paying full price for a service that wasn't done properly.

 

This is what the FTT is for, they can decide whether the amount you pay is reasonable or not, see here > https://www.gov.uk/housing-tribunals

 

Second issue is that in the buildings lease contact it states no animals are allowed, yet there are many apartments with animals and unfortunately some owners allow their dogs to deficate in the communal corridors, lifts and entrance doors and do not clean up after them - this is left for the cleaners to do which they are not responsible for as the building should have animals in. I have complained about this to R&R and have been asked to give them apartment numbers for people with dogs!!! Why should I do this? We have CCTV through the buildings and they have said they don't have the time to look through the footage to find where the owners live! My thoughts are that the CCTV doesn't work!! Any advice on this will be greatly appreciated as I have had enough!

 

Most leases normally oblige FH's to take action against other tenants who are breaching the lease.

 

We have one meeting a year with R&R but nothing ever comes from it. We don't receive any letters letting us know what they are doing with our money and you see no changes around the building.

 

Again, see the RICS Code, also S21 and S22 of landlord & Tenant act 1985 gives you powers to demand to see summary/breakdown of costs and even visit them to see paperwork, etc - See http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1985/70

The building manager is meant to come out one day a week to look around and check things but he hasn't been here for months.

Thanks in advance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...