Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HLM Property Management Administration charges


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3344 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I am not sure if this is the right place for this query.

 

However I have a question i hope someone can help me with. My house is subject to HLM Property management, they are responsible for the maintenance of the estate and I get a bill each year as a service charge.

 

I had cash flow problems so was late paying the £152 fee, this was due on the 1st of January, but I received the letter, apologizing for the delay in issuing the charge, dated 16th February.

 

I was informed that the balance owing was over £290, the extra £140 odd pounds is an administration fee. I was gobsmacked but I have sent a mail to them regarding that and have paid the £152.31 I owed pending the outcome of what will happen with the extra administration fee.

 

I paid the £152.13 today , 20/04/2015. Now if 28 days are allowed from receipt of the letter, which at the earliest would be 17th, then I am 27 days late in paying. 28 days late if 28 days from the date of the letter.

 

Can an administration charge of this amount really be justifiable? I have put my case to them but I am banking on them being unsympathetic but I do feel an administration charge that almost doubles the original fee is somewhat disproportionate and would appreciate some advise as to what I can do in this situation.

 

Many thanks in advance.

 

DJC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they are a penalty they are unlawful

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX

 

thanks for the reply. I said to them that I thought that this was surely unlawful, but they said not stating they had won numerous court cases about it, I was very dubious. Is there any information I can read regarding legalities of administration charges? Something that I can quote and refer them to in my defense ?

 

Regards

 

DJC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I disagree with dx100uk, admin/extra/legal charges may well be payable if allowed by the lease, their is plenty of case law to support this.

 

Right lets start at the beginning, I assume you have a leasehold property, any charges MUST be within the lease (you should read and fully understand this).

 

I also assume the £152 is a service charge (and not Ground Rent ?). If you were late paying what does the lease say about this ?, if nothing then no extra charges can be added on full stop.

 

Firstly were the service charge demands valid ?, they must comply with the lease (dates, need to be certified ?) and they MUST comply exactly with this > http://www.lease-advice.org/publications/documents/document.asp?item=13, if not then nothing is payable.

 

Now also a step many companies forget is that extra admin charges (if allowable) must be demanded in accordance with this > http://www.lease-advice.org/publications/documents/document.asp?item=89

 

Even if they comply with all of the above then you can apply to the FTT (Previoulsy LVT) that the charges are not reasonable, for example sdid it cost £140 to send you a letter about being late (I for example had simil;ar fees reduced from £50 to £25 !), so id say £140 maybe excessive.

 

Have a read of (or redact and post up your lease) and come back

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's twice I've forgotten that now..old age.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thanks for the replies.

 

 

I received the following in email:

 

===================================

Further to your email below I have looked into your account to review the administration fee charged.

 

You are aware that under the terms of your lease your service charges are due annually in advance on 1st January each year.

 

Administration charges are not added to the account straight away, an original application for payment is issued, then if a payment is not received 28 days after the issue date a further chaser letter is sent out warning that the next letter (letter before action) will incur an administration charge if payment is not received promptly. After a further 10 working days the final chaser letter is issued which incurs an administration charge of £120.00 plus vat, then after a further 10 working days the account is referred to our solicitor which incurs their referral fee of £165.00 plus vat.

 

An initial application for payment was issued to you on 16th February 2015 as per the attachment which you sent. We are made aware when these have been dispatched. An initial reminder letter was then issued to you on 24th March 2015 which at the point had given you 36 days to make the payment. A further 22 days past before a second letter was issued on 15th April 2015 which incurred the administration fee of £120.00 plus vat. Payment was not received until 20th April 2015.

 

The credit control procedure has been followed correctly and it is for the above reasons that on this occasion the administration fee will not be refunded to your account.

====================================

 

Now I did not receive said letter they say was issued on 15th April 2015.

 

I feel that this admin charge is well over what would be considered proportional to the original fee. Is there anything I can do here?

 

Many thanks.

 

DJC

Link to post
Share on other sites

I refer back to my previous post, it all depends on the lease, for a charge to be payable it HAS TO BE chargeable in the lease, with wording such as "late payment will attract a fee of£xxx" but it may be written in leaglese jargon and not as simple as that.

 

As I also mentioned any demand for an extra dmin fee must be attached with the Summary of Rights _ Admin Charges, many MC/FH's forget this.

 

Even if payable, you certainly could argue that £120 is more than enough to cover two letters.

 

You need to read the lease or post it here, then write to the company asking which clause in the lease allows them to charge such a fee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...