Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Like
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

MKRR/MKDP HSBC debt


shifnal
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3146 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had a letter this morning from a company calling itself MKPD. They claim in the letter that

 

HSBC Bank plc has assigned all its respective rights title and interests in respect of the HSBC Bank plc current account number XXXXX to MKDP LLP on 8th December 2011.

 

MK Rapid Recoveries has been appointed by MKDP LLP to manage your account and it is essential that all future payments and correspondence regarding this account be directed to MK Rapid Recoveries at MK Rapid Recoveries, Fleming House, Seebeck Place, Knowhill, Milton Keynes MK5 8FR

 

They say the debt is for £1,848.88p, but I have no knowledge of this debt. I am also suspicious as they say it was passed to them in December 2011, so why wait until know to write to me?

 

Any advice as what to do would be gratefully appreciated. Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore them

its statute barred

 

 

check your credit file mind

 

 

to be sure

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Update: I had another letter from them today (Thursday 2nd April), stating that as I hadn't replied they would

Unti we reach an agreement to clear this balance we will continue to contact you by telephone or letter so we would advise you to resolve this matter.

 

What action should I take as I do not like being harrassed. Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello - my partner had exactly the same letter today also (/02/04/15) - he is almost certain that the debt is now statute barred hence we wondered if that was why there have been no nasty demands for payments threatening allsorts in bold red writing. Not sure whether to just ignore as if it is SB there's nowt they can do apart from hoping to hassle someone into paying??? Any thoughts/comments welcome !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

both of you do nothing more

 

 

save the SB trick for if/when they issue a claimform

 

 

just remember in E&W

even though a debt is SB'd

it still exists and can be chased.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you are certain that it is sb, write and tell them

 

/ CONC / 7 / 15 show_instruments_disabled.gifCONC 7.15 Statute barred debts

 

CONC 7.15.1

01/04/2014

FCA

 

A debt is statute barred where the prescribed period within which a claim in relation to the debt may be brought expires. In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the limitation period is generally six years in relation to debt. In Scotland, the prescriptive period is five years in relation to debt.

 

[Note: annex B1 of DCG]

 

CONC 7.15.2

01/04/2014

FCA

 

In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, a statute barred debt still exists and is recoverable.

 

[Note: paragraph 3.15a and annex B3 of DCG]

 

CONC 7.15.3

01/04/2014

FCA

 

In Scotland, a statute barred debt ceases to exist and is no longer recoverable if1) a relevant claim on behalf of the lender or owner has not been made during the relevant limitation period; and

(2) the debt has not been acknowledged by, or on behalf of, the customer during the relevant limitation period.

 

[Note: annex B3 of DCG]

 

 

CONC 7.15.4

01/04/2014

FCA

 

Notwithstanding that a debt may be recoverable, a firm must not attempt to recover a statute barred debt in England, Wales or Northern Ireland if the lender or owner has not been in contact with the customer during the limitation period.

 

[Note: paragraph 3.15b of DCG]

 

CONC 7.15.5

01/04/2014

FCA

 

If the lender or owner has been in regular contact with the customer during the limitation period, the firm may continue to attempt to recover the debt.

[Note: paragraph 3.15b of DCG]

 

CONC 7.15.6

01/04/2014

FCA

 

A firm must endeavour to ensure that it does not mislead a customer as to the customer's rights and obligations.

 

[Note: paragraph 3.15b of DCG]

 

CONC 7.15.7

01/04/2014

FCA

 

It is misleading for a firm to suggest or state that a customer may be the subject of court action for the sum of the statute barred debt when the firm knows, or reasonably ought to know, that the relevant limitation period has expired.

 

[Note: paragraph 3.15b of DCG]

 

CONC 7.15.8

01/04/2014

FCA

 

A firm must not continue to demand payment from a customer after the customer has stated that he will not be paying the debt because it is statute barred.

 

[Note: paragraph 3.15b of DCG]

 

CONC 7.15.9

01/04/2014

FCA

 

A firm must identify for prospective purchasers of debts arising under credit agreements or consumer hire agreements or P2P agreements those debts which it knows or ought reasonably to know are statute barred, so as to avoid a firm taking inappropriate action against customers in relation to such debts.

 

[Note: paragraph 3.23c of DCG]

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Just an update.

 

 

Had two letter from them today (20th April).

 

 

One was the standard, "we have't heard from you," letter.

 

 

The other was a statement.

It claims that it sent a previous statement on 30th Nove 2013,

but I never received such a statement.

 

 

It does state: "Total payments received £0.00."

 

Should I now send the SB letter or still wait? Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just the std statement they must send every 12mts or better.

if they think they are now the owner

else they cant charge interest.

 

 

as said pers I'd not pull the SB card out unless they issue a claimform

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hi! Update. Had a letter today from a company called Hoist Portfolio Holding 2 Limited, saying that my account has been passed onto them by MKDP LLP, and asking me to make payment.

 

Should I do anything or ignore? Neither these or MKPD have ever shown proof that I am responsible for this debt. Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hoist bought MKDP recently

 

 

just trying to spoof you.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...