Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

been forced to look for voluntary work


bcham
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3349 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

just got back from joke center.where i was told to start looking for charity work ,i did the mandatory 4 weeks work trial a few month back now she says i need more recent experience on my cv . even though i have a 35 year reocord of working. im nearly 60. i told her i think its my age why im getting no interviews ,she said its nothing to do with my age being nearly 60. what will happen if i dont get a voluntary job ,why should i be forced in to it at my age.:-x

 

 

I am the same age as you (60 next week) and I have worked for 44 years

 

 

The JC advice to cull a few years from your cv is actually a sound one, in 2000 my Husband then aged 51 was made redundant and as part of his package his employer sent him to a company that specialised in helping older people find work, as well as changing the layout of his cv one of the first things they advised him to do was to remove some of his earlier work record, and it worked he got a job within a couple of months. I myself have done the same and have never had any comeback from an employer

 

 

You seem to think that just because you have worked for 35 years you should be given special treatment ( the old I have paid in and am entitled nonsense?) and that's an attitude I don't really understand after all I have worked far more years than you and should feel 'entitled' myself.

 

 

As for being angry that you are being 'forced' to volunteer at age early 60 again that's an attitude I don't understand, I had to take a year out mid 2013/2014 due to various reasons, during that time I volunteered in a Charity shop, last June when I was able to apply for jobs again, I applied for a full time paid Charity Shop Managers job, and got it based on the voluntary work I was doing, not bad going getting the first job I applied for at age 59 in an unemployment black spot.

 

 

If you at the age of nearly 60 applied for a volunteer role in my shop you would in fact be my YOUNGEST volunteer, even my 66 year old Husband who himself worked for 45 years does 3 days, the rest are 65 plus my oldest volunteer is 84.

 

 

You really are going to have to do something soon as you will still have 6/7 years before you get your pension

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it is the being forced rather than the actual volunteering that is the real issue. Being required to take up an unpaid role under the threat of sanction is not volunteering ! If it displaces a paid worker in the process, then there is something fundamentally wrong in the role, the business providing the "opportunity", and the outfit arranging the provision.

 

I've done voluntary stuff, things that held an interest and provided a challenge, but there was no "requirement" nor threat of sanction.

 

 

I suppose its my attitude but I really cant see why people like the OP who obviously needs more recent experience is not prepared to do anything about it until they are 'forced to'.

 

 

I don't agree with CWP in charity shops and my charity does not use them, however I would do my best to help any volunteer of working age to get a job, including providing references or a set of interview clothes completely free from my shop.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...