Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

A Seminar - "Dealing with Rogue Bailiffs and Protecting People in Debt"


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3385 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

On 29th April 2015 the very popular Public Policy Exchange are holding a one day seminar entiltled:

 

Dealing with Rogue Bailiffs and Protecting People in Debt. The 'subject' matter is very interesting indeed.

 

 

http://www.publicpolicyexchange.co.uk/events/FD28-PPE

 

http://www.publicpolicyexchange.co.uk/media/events/flyers/FD28-PPE_flyer.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Company Name PUBLIC POLICY EXCHANGE LIMITED

Company Number 07350384

Company Status Active - Accounts Filed

Director(s) - Vashantsing Gokhool

Current Active Appointments 6

Dissolved Companies 1

Date of Birth 17/07/1964

Function Director

Appointment Date 19/08/10

Company Incorporation Date 19/08/10

Turnover -

Net Worth -£115,125

Credit Rating 51

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Seminar is interesting given that the subjects being discussed include:

Examining the new bailiff Reforms introduced in April 2014 and whether they have provided any more Protection against Aggressive Bailiffs.

 

Investgate how to comply with the existing Code of Conduct

 

Consider the 'National Standards for Enforcement Agents' document and it's ability to be an effective national guidance tool

 

Explore ways of improving accountability of bailiff firms (via a licensing system)

 

Debate the potential contribution of an Independent Regulator to oversee agents agents

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there anything said about the speakers presenting the event ?

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Seminar is interesting given that the subjects being discussed include:

Examining the new bailiff Reforms introduced in April 2014 and whether they have provided any more Protection against Aggressive Bailiffs.

 

Investgate how to comply with the existing Code of Conduct

 

Consider the 'National Standards for Enforcement Agents' document and it's ability to be an effective national guidance tool

 

Explore ways of improving accountability of bailiff firms (via a licensing system)

 

Debate the potential contribution of an Independent Regulator to oversee agents agents

 

BA do you have any idea who the speakers will be?

 

Just for info..........The seminar is not by 'invitation', those interested will need to register with the event organiser.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is bad enough when bailiffs give incorrect information to debtors but much worse is when 'advisers' give incorrect information on websites.

 

I have had the misfortune to read one website this afternoon where this particular Seminar is being advertised. The website owner is stating that he had been 'invited' to attend and that his fee will be £146 and furthermore; that he is looking to use the seminar to raise suggested amendments to the current legislation and more serious, that he has:

 

'Made an Amendment Slip to be put forward at the 12 month review of the regulations'

Firstly, there is no such document as an 'Amendment Slip'. Complete nonsense.

 

Secondly, any 'amendments' to Legislation may only be made by a government official and certainly not by a person who write wills for a living!!

 

Thirdly, the government have pledged that they will be reviewing the legislation at one year, three years and five years. Meetings with various interested groups/organisations have been taking place with the Ministry of Justice since November and meetings are on frequent basis. Changes will be made to legislation if it is felt appropriate and I would expect this to happen rather soon (there are very good reason why which I will address later).

 

The fees for attending are pretty steep and 'presently' if I was going to attend....I would expect to be charged £395 (or less for early registration).

 

The fee of £146 is applicable to a person/company that is a 'Local Voluntary Community Organisation'.This will writer would not qualify as being 'local' and certainly would not qualify as a 'voluntary organisation'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

BA do you have any idea who the speakers will be?

 

Just for info..........The seminar is not by 'invitation', those interested will need to register with the event organiser.

 

Invitations would be made to Speakers (and of course they would not be charged a fee).

 

Everyone else wishing to attend would need to register. As I understand it.....speakers have not yet been appointed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is bad enough when bailiffs give incorrect information to debtors but much worse is when 'advisers' give incorrect information on websites.

 

I have had the misfortune to read one website this afternoon where this particular Seminar is being advertised. The website owner is stating that he had been 'invited' to attend and that his fee will be £146 and furthermore; that he is looking to use the seminar to raise suggested amendments to the current legislation and more serious, that he has:

 

'Made an Amendment Slip to be put forward at the 12 month review of the regulations'

Firstly, there is no such document as an 'Amendment Slip'. Complete nonsense.

 

Secondly, any 'amendments' to Legislation may only be made by a government official and certainly not by a person who write wills for a living!!

 

Thirdly, the government have pledged that they will be reviewing the legislation at one year, three years and five years. Meetings with various interested groups/organisations have been taking place with the Ministry of Justice since November and meetings are on frequent basis. Changes will be made to legislation if it is felt appropriate and I would expect this to happen rather soon (there are very good reason why which I will address later).

 

The fees for attending are pretty steep and 'presently' if I was going to attend....I would expect to be charged £395 (or less for early registration).

 

The fee of £146 is applicable to a person/company that is a 'Local Voluntary Community Organisation'.This will writer would not qualify as being 'local' and certainly would not qualify as a 'voluntary organisation'.

 

.....the category 'Local Voluntary Community Organisation' (which as you say does not qualify a will writer) is given to be at a cost of £156 per person, discounted to £140 per person if two delgates from the same organisation enrol, (both figures are exclusive of VAT) the actual cost(s) would be £187.20 or £168 repectively yet we read 'My invitation is only £146 for the day'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this seminar kosher or a money spinner for the organiser?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this seminar kosher or a money spinner for the organiser?

 

It depends on the speakers really, it is not going to change anything, although if the right people are there it can be informative and enable the various sections of the enforcment and advice sectors work better together. If not it can be a bit like a knitting circle discussion.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

[

 

The Seminar is interesting given that the subjects being discussed include:

 

Examining the new bailiff Reforms introduced in April 2014 and whether they have provided any more Protection against Aggressive Bailiffs.

 

Investgate how to comply with the existing Code of Conduct

 

Consider the 'National Standards for Enforcement Agents' document and it's ability to be an effective national guidance tool

 

Explore ways of improving accountability of bailiff firms (via a licensing system)

 

Debate the potential contribution of an Independent Regulator to oversee agents agents

 

Looking at the above items on the agenda, I would comment as follows:

 

Examining the new Bailiff Reforms

 

This subject could be discussed relatively easily.

 

Investigate how to comply with the existing Code of Conduct

 

Not sure what this can refer to. What Code of Conduct?

 

Consider the 'National Standards for Enforcement Agents' document and it's ability to be an effective national guidance tool.

 

Interesting subject given that by the time of the Seminar it is very much hoped that revisions will have been made to the current National Standards. It is planned that the new Standards will then be endorsed by all groups etc that had been consulted.

 

Explore ways of improving accountability of bailiff firms (via a licensing system)

 

When the new legislation was introduced the Ministry of Justice announced that they would not be considering a Licensing body.

 

Debate the potential contribution of an Independent Regulator to oversee agents agents

 

Again, this probably comes under the same answer as above. Furthermore, the government have made clear that they will not fund any regulatory body.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there anything said about the speakers presenting the event ?

 

Given the subject matter (and the cost) it is inevitable that those attending would expect to have a speaker from the Ministry of Justice (in respect of the bailiff regulations) and a senior representative possibly from the Department of Communities Local Government (DCLG) regarding the subject of debt/council tax etc.

 

However, given the date of the seminar (29th April), representatives from MOJ and DCLG would not be able to attend given that the date would be in the Purdah period. This is the period between the dissolution of Parliament (on 30th March) and polling day (7th May).

 

During Purdah central and local government departments are prevented from making announcements about any administrative or legislative changes which could be seen to be advantageous to any candidates or parties in the forthcoming election, or which may commit any incoming new administration to policies which it wouldn't support.

 

I would assume that the organisers were unaware of this.

 

If any amendments are to be made to legislation regarding bailiff regulations this would need to be completed before the Purdah period on 30th March.

Link to post
Share on other sites

.....the category 'Local Voluntary Community Organisation' (which as you say does not qualify a will writer) is given to be at a cost of £156 per person, discounted to £140 per person if two delgates from the same organisation enrol, (both figures are exclusive of VAT) the actual cost(s) would be £187.20 or £168 repectively yet we read 'My invitation is only £146 for the day'.

 

PS.......click 'register your place' for details to the above mentioned costs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it should be made clear that this is ot a governmental endorsed discussion , the kind that precedes a white paper for instance or amendments to existing regulations, it is merely a discussion platform, so no "amendments slips" will be needed.

 

I think that there has been an embarrassing misconception and the usual suspect has sought to build his part.

 

It could nevertheless be useful in terms of advice agencies and EA understanding each others point of view and encouraging better communications.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The fees for attending are pretty steep and 'presently' if I was going to attend....I would expect to be charged £395 (or less for early registration).

 

The fee of £146 is applicable to a person/company that is a 'Local Voluntary Community Organisation'.This will writer would not qualify as being 'local' and certainly would not qualify as a 'voluntary organisation'.

 

Because the seminar is during the Purdah period speakers from central or local government would not be able to attend so this may affect attendance figures.

 

In fact, on a personal basis, if I wished to do so I would be able to register for the lower price of £140 given that at the end of this month we should have our new phone system in place and all calls will be free.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

However, given the date of the seminar (29th April), representatives from MOJ and DCLG would not be able to attend given that the date would be in the Purdah period. This is the period between the dissolution of Parliament (on 30th March) and polling day (7th May).

 

During Purdah central and local government departments are prevented from making announcements about any administrative or legislative changes which could be seen to be advantageous to any candidates or parties in the forthcoming election, or which may commit any incoming new administration to policies which it wouldn't support.

 

If any amendments are to be made to legislation regarding bailiff regulations this would need to be completed before the Purdah period on 30th March.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purdah_%28pre-election_period%29

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've no doubt that the organiser will offer free slots to prominent stakeholders like the CAB, CIVEA and MoJ but the whole thing seems very poorly timed given all the content for the promised annual review would have been submitted and dealt with.

 

What with the steep attendance fee I will not be bothering.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The time & money spent on something like this would be much better used involving the authorities that have the clout to help. Already on here there are examples of some Enforcement Agents/Companies who still have problems addressing the 7 clear days rule - Equita for example. Where are there examples of Enforcement Agents undergoing Training and what format does this take - is there a particular acknowledged qualification at the end of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've no doubt that the organiser will offer free slots to prominent stakeholders like the CAB, CIVEA and MoJ but the whole thing seems very poorly timed given all the content for the promised annual review would have been submitted and dealt with.

 

What with the steep attendance fee I will not be bothering.

Haved to concur, what will be gained at this point from it apart from someone making some money.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to say that i attended a lot of this kind of event as part of the third sector coalition here in Tameside, and also the credit union and found them most useful for networking purposes. However other than payng for your hotel accommodation they were free.

 

I understand that these events cost money to put on of course but this one as BA points out does not seem to be particularity well researched in that most of the bullet points are either none issues or have already been decided.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dodgeball, you are correct that many seminars are useful, but this one may well not offer anything substantial bearing in mind what yourself and BA have posted.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because the seminar is during the Purdah period speakers from central or local government would not be able to attend so this may affect attendance figures.

 

In fact, on a personal basis, if I wished to do so I would be able to register for the lower price of £140 given that at the end of this month we should have our new phone system in place and all calls will be free.

 

There are a lot of people who just simply do not know which way to turn when faced with bailiff problems, free calls will be a definate bonus to debtors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...