Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Halifax Ultimate Reward Current Account


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3455 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi 1Mango

 

As CB has explained, write a Formal Letter of Complaint, mark it as such. Explain what's happened (mis-sold account), how they have let your mother down (not explaining how the account functions, monthly charges, the benefits are no use to your mother, not allowing the account to be closed, failing to refund the monthly fee) and what you want them to do (refund the monthly fee/close the account).

 

Also point out that because Halifax are regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, the Halifax have to adhere to a set of legally binding key principles laid down in the Banking: Conduct of Business Source Book.

 

State that Halifax has treated your mum unfairly under the following BCOBS Principles:

 

Principle - Customers' interests - A firm must pay due regard to the interests of its customers and treat them fairly.

 

Principle - Communications with clients - A firm must pay due regard to the information needs of its clients, and communicate information to them in a way which is clear, fair and not misleading.

 

 

Send it to:-

 

Mr David Nicholson

Managing Director

Halifax Bank

[email protected]

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Klandestine

 

Why should she want an account with perks?, we weren't party to the sales conversation, but it is very suspect.

 

'As you know, the Ultimate Reward account offers "perks" such as

emergency home repair cover,

AA Breakdown Coverlink3.gif,

mobile phone insurance and

travel insurance.

 

I must point out that my mum doesn't drive and therefore doesn't own a car,

she has never owned a mobile phone and she is unfit to travel due to health reasons.

The only thing she could possibly benefit from is the home emergency repair cover.

She was never asked whether she drives, owns a mobile phone or travels. '

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't need to read anything again, as far as I'm concerned, everything is important.

 

You need to re-read the thread. Why on earth are you saying that to me?

 

It was dx100uk who said not to focus on the perks in the complaint and to instead talk about how the account was sold on the basis of the interest free overdraft.

 

I just commented that I'd be weary of basing your complaint on that because the interest free overdraft may well have actually saved the OP's mother some money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 1Mango

 

It's best if you write on behalf of your mother. But you'll need to enclose an Ordinary Power of Attorney, otherwise they won't discuss anything with you.

 

http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/england/relationships_e/relationships_looking_after_people_e/managing_affairs_for_someone_else.htm#h_ordinary_power_of_attorney

 

Thanks everyone for taking the trouble to reply and for the sound advice. I will now get the ball rolling by putting my letter of complaint together. Can I just ask - should I be writing the letter from myself (as a concerned daughter), or should I write it from my mum? Which is best?

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...