Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thousands more passengers could face delays or cancellations after an arson attack on France's train network on Friday.View the full article
    • you never use or give an email  2nd class stamp with free proof of posting from any po counter dx
    • Much appreciated for the ammendment. The snottier the better right!   What I am assuming is that this response is to be posted to Gladstones? However, I am seeing some users sending this as an email instead, which is a little confusing.  If we're happy with this response, what would you suggest is the best way to send it over to them (post/email), and is there anything additional I could include (if necessary)?  Thanks again! 
    • Hi I've read through other threads to better inform me of the process from here onwards. When I put in the MoneyClaim it gave me a claim number and it currently says to wait for the defendant to respond, they have until 7 August.   It seems their most likely action is to extend that a further 14 days to about 21 August - this hasn't happened yet, of course, as it is only 27 July but I'm anticipating that may be the case. when the expected defence action is taken by EVRi I will need to submit DQ with these responses A1 - no mediation B - my contact details C1 - yes to the small claims track D1 - No.  If No please state why.  I believe the defence will provide some rebuttal to the particulars of claim and so I need to include details as to why the claim requires a hearing.  Is there some certain templated text I can include here or will it vary depending on what the defendant comes back with? I see on the form it mentions the following: Relevant reasons include that there are factual disputes which will need the judge to hear from witnesses directly or the issues are so complex they need to be argued orally.  Hoping to reach out to see what may be the most effective statements for D1 reasoning. E1-5 are pretty straightforward. I want to get ahead of things and be ready to take the next step so I appreciate what advice you may have about the DQ.   Thanks!  
    • Rachel Reeves is set to reveal a public finances shortfall of billions on pounds after a snap audit.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Returning to the UK and CCJs


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3726 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I left the UK in 2007 to live abroad. Whilst away our house was repossessed (Tenants not paying rent - I couldn't afford mortgage) and a CCJ was issued. Two further CCJs were issued, one for non-payment of a credit card and the third from "MAYORS & CITY," which I do not know what it is for. I only know about the CCJs from viewing my credit report - I do not have any paperwork or court documents.

 

After 6 1/2 years I am now planning to return to the UK.

 

The CCJs are dated between Mid '09 to Mid '10.

There are credit agreements in default on my file dated between 2008 and 2009.

 

I understand that the default accounts will "Drop off," the report as they hit 6 yrs and the CCJs will be un-enforceable and leave the report once they hit 6 years old.

 

I haven't had any contact with the creditors or the courts whilst I have been abroad.

 

I am not on the UK electoral role.

 

I plan to rent a property, can I put this under a parent's name as "Furnished," so on paper I do not own any of the property contents? I will not pass a credit check in the UK so can not rent a property in my name anyway.

 

I will also drive a car owned by a parent.

 

I do not plan to attempt any credit applications.

 

Is there anything else that I need to consider to ensure that I remain "Under the radar," on my return to the UK for the next couple of years until the debts are all barred by statute?

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCJ will not go away after 6 years. It will drop of your file but it will still be there should the person who got it decides to enforce it. They will have to explain to the court why it's took so long but you being out the country is a pretty good reason for the court to enforce it.

 

Debt avoidance is not something this forum is for.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

To add to the above it is very rare for a court to grant enforcement on a ccj over 6 years

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ashmk, I appreciate that this forum is not for debt avoidance, I left the UK to set up a business, the business was not successful so I could not repay the mortgage in the UK once the tenants stopped paying the rent hence the repossession and CCJ. Due to the difficulties with the business abroad I ended up taking more credit abroad. I can return to the UK and service the debt abroad. I am assuming that you would not advise that I return to the UK and contact all creditors on landing to explain that I have returned to the UK. As when people launch a Ltd liability company, I am trying to set up my new UK life with limited liability. The worst case scenario is that I return to the UK with my possessions, rent a house, buy a car, put the kids into school and 4-6 weeks down the line I get a bailiff at the door relieving me of the car and all contents of my rented property.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To add to the above it is very rare for a court to grant enforcement on a ccj over 6 years

 

Thanks renegadeimp, as ashmk stated I am guessing that in my case, being out of the country for 6 1/2 years with no forward contact details is a good reason for the court to enforce it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers I'd sit tight and do nowt.

 

 

if you were out of thecountry

you had no opportunity to defend yourself

so that works for you rather than against you.

 

 

I doubt you'll hear anymore about them.

 

 

when they drop off the cra file

will give you a good indication.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think you can do anything

to really hide.

 

it will come out

 

but its who got the CCJ's and their value is the more important info

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...