Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You sit tight and see if their threat transpires..if they make an application the court will send you a copy of their application (n244) and evidence/statement in support of their application. You can then submit your own statement in response (within 7 days of the notified hearing date) with objections and evidence as to why the court should dismiss their application. Lets see what transpires I'm sure it will be smoke and mirrors.
    • there is never a need to use signed for. it doesn't work to po boxes etc as most firms use mailing centres. follow the guide next time, 2nd class stamp with free proof of posting is all thats needed. do not respond by email phone etc. could there be a case of irresponsible lending here? was your file shot with defaults and lots of lending already in debt when they gave the loan too you? that could be the reason. dx  
    • well make sure you write telling them of your correct correspondence address , they wont do anything nor sell it on i doubt. so they are pulling their old stunt of a managed loan (search here for HSBC Managed loan). they got carpetted for that several years ago. make sure there is zero income going into the od account. open a parachute account pronto is there is. starve them of income, the od can go sing dixy now. is your home jointly owned? mortgaged? just looking to their options should they go nuclear. dx
    • well done.  you know the routine. hold on filing till say 20th ish? get it in before xmas/new year closedown / postage issues. you'll see the sticky upon how to respond to an SPC and you'll need to make ref to the previous failed CCA request. that wont go down well with the sheriff, AYR guys know nolans very well and their tricks. had previous dealing with 2 of the sheriffs there won both.  ps have a look in financial legal issues and you'll see numerous barclaycard claimform threads. BC never give out the cca even for 2015 online signup, 9/10 its fake stuff and claimants try to rely upon recon rules.
    • Thanks, that gives me a bit of comfort.  All onboard at my end: filed, signed and dated - and accepted by the court. They also confirmed they would send the defence to Nolans.  I also posted my defence. Positive I've proof of posting, but will have to do a bit of digging to find it. Clerk reviewing and will get back to me with what to do. Assuming this can be recalled, they've bought themselves more time to uncover the paperwork which they've yet to provide
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.


      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
    • Post in Some advice on buying a used car
    • People are still buying used cars unseen, paying by cash or by bank transfer, relying on brand-new MOT's by the dealer's favourite MOT station….
      It always leads to tears!
      used car.mp4


    • Pizza delivery insurance.mp4




      Parcel delivery insurance 1.mp4
        • Haha
      • 2 replies
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3529 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

Arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, to All of them Arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr




Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...



Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...