Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Bryan Carter / Lowells - £1286.59 - Court Action on 9 April 2014 - PLEASE HELP ME


JadeA
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3731 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

I have had a quick look on this forum and see that others are having similar issues as me but I really want some personal advice to my situation. So thank you to anyone who replies (also, it may be worth noting I am a complete novice when it comes to debt management)

 

So I have received the below letter from Bryan Carter Solicitors and I am very concerned. The letter was sent to my parents house where I haven't lived for a few years now and I have only recently began seeing my parents again so have received no other communication that this which my parents gave me yesterday.

 

Dear Miss xxxxx

 

Our client: Lowell Financial Limited

Account no: xxxxxxxxxx

Our ref: xxxxxxxx

Balance: £1286.59

 

We have been instructed by Fredrickson International Limited on behalf of Lowell Financial Limited to issue court proceedings on 09 Apr 2014 if payment of this debt is not received by us on this date.

 

If proceedings are issued, solicitors costs, court fees and interest will be added to the amount that you owe and will be enforced against you if a Judgement is subsequently obtained.

 

You must contact us on 0845 0349918 before 09 Apr 2014 to make payment if you wish to avoid the matter going to court.

 

Please see the reverse of this letter for full details of the different types of payment methods we accept. You can also manage your account online at xxxxxxx

 

If you dispute liability for this debt please provide your reasons in writing and supply us with all documents in support of any defence you may have,

 

A Judgement Order (CCJ) will remain on the Register of Judgement debts for a period of 6 years and may affect your ability to obtain credit in the future.

 

This matter has now reached a stage where you may want to obtain legal advice.

 

Yours Sincerely

 

xxxx

 

Firstly I am not sure what this is for - I have sent no letters to Bryan Carter Solicitors or Lowells as I havent received any previous letters. I do have a couple of outstanding debts, one with Capital One and one with Orange, I think this may be for Capital One but I have no letters from them either.

 

What I want to know is - where do I start, I think I need to send a CCA?(?) but is there time for this since they are going to start court proceedings in 9 days! I am very scared at the moment :( couple with the fact I am in early pregnancy and extremely emotional and all over the place at the moment.

 

Please could someone advise me what to do next to rectify this. I would be happy to pay the debt but can't afford to pay it all at once. But also someone told me that since I did not take out the agreement with Lowells then they do not have a leg to stand on. I am so confused.

 

I have looked in to going to my local CAB office, but the appointments are in the mornings 3 x days a week and I have work. You also need to complete a triage form and wait for them to contact you within 3 days if they are going to give you appointment, time is not a thing I have in this case!

 

Grateful for any advice, and please, do treat me like the complete novice I am.

 

Kind Regards,

 

Jade

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies a quick update.

 

I have logged in to Noddle and it states on my credit file that I am paying and I am up to date with Capital one. It is showing up thayt the default outstanding payments are to Lowells. I really am not sure what this is for. Is a CCA the best route?

 

Kind Regards

Jade

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your help.

 

And from what I gather once I have sent this (recorded delivery) with a £1 crossed postal order, they will need to halt any court proceedings until they have responded and the dispute is resolved?

 

Grateful for your response x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats right. They should not pursue legal action while they remain in default of a CCA request. Please note though, that if the agreement was taken out post april 2007 they can simply supply a reconstituted CCA, and then it will be up to a judge whether the debt is enforceable or not.

 

Just remember, lowells, freds and carter are very litigous. They do not care at all about the legality of the debt. They simply abuse the court process as a form of debt collection. Once you file a defence ( if/when they they issue a claim), youll notice that carter runs off and says " sorry, ive washed my hands of it now. Ive passed it back to freds". He always does that without fail.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...