Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Birmingham Midshires Erc So It Begins! **SETTLED - 3/4 paid **


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6300 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Really hope that the judge does what he should Biffa......tense weekend coming up!

Please note that I am not a legal expert and all advice given is without prejudice and is purely my opinion only.

 

** Nationwide - £1821.15-PAID IN FULL - Aug 06 **

** Halifax Mortgage -£390 - PAID IN FULL - Nov 06 **

Lloyds TSB - MCOL issued 09/03/07 - £2953 + costs - ON HOLD....

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 184
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks Biffa, this shows that a case can't be thrown out because you are suing the wrong organisation. Halifax have stated that my account is being administered by BM, and I am wary of the Halifax BOS merger. Want to make sure I'm suing the right one - don't want it thrown out on a technicality.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My Fingers are crossed for you my friend. I will be watching on Monday.

Have a good weekend

 

Ukaviator

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Biffa I'm in Liverpool so when your nearer your date for court PM me and I also will come and support you if you want :)

When you want to fool the world, tell the truth. :D

Advice & opinions of Janet-M are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any

doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

BIG FAT BUMP to see if it was thrown out :)

Please note that I am not a legal expert and all advice given is without prejudice and is purely my opinion only.

 

** Nationwide - £1821.15-PAID IN FULL - Aug 06 **

** Halifax Mortgage -£390 - PAID IN FULL - Nov 06 **

Lloyds TSB - MCOL issued 09/03/07 - £2953 + costs - ON HOLD....

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh FFS, wish the judge would hurry up and do what they SHOULD do. If it were us and not some huge organisation I bet they wouldn't be that hesitant in sticking the knife into us.

Please note that I am not a legal expert and all advice given is without prejudice and is purely my opinion only.

 

** Nationwide - £1821.15-PAID IN FULL - Aug 06 **

** Halifax Mortgage -£390 - PAID IN FULL - Nov 06 **

Lloyds TSB - MCOL issued 09/03/07 - £2953 + costs - ON HOLD....

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

my fear and i must admit(i think will happen) is that the solicitor from BM will resume from her hols on wednesday to find my bundle lying on her desk and immediatly apply for additional time to submit their disclosure regardless of the fact that the judge ordered full disclosure by 26th jan. iam still hopin it goes my way in the next day or so

Link to post
Share on other sites

The court system in this country is a bloody joke !!!!!

 

In the post today i got a court notice stating that the BM had requested an extention of time to submit their bundle by 4pm on 23rd feb 2007, they ve obviously received my bundle and **** themselves and made an immediate application for more time.

 

IN THE MEANTIME i phoned the court and the file has come back down, the judge in his wisdom has ordered that i make a further application to have my request for a strike out of the defence heard at an hearing. This is going to cost me another £35 ! and the hassle of going to court to tell the judge how they failed to adhere to initial court directions. Their pathetic application for more time must have been lying on the file when it went up to the judge with my application for the strike out. YET ANOTHER BLOODY EXAMPLE OF THE COURTS KICKING THE LITTLE PERSOM WHEN THEYRE DOWN. where do i go from here ???? is an hearing likley to result in a strike out of their defence ????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Folks iam now at a loss as to where to start any degree of negotiation in relation to this claim.

My costs in relation to this claim have been

£120 initial mcol fee

£100 court process fee

£35 application fee (for strike out)

the claim itself is about £3,150.00 (with court fees and interest would have been approx £4,005.00 (hence small claim)

 

Iam at LBA stage with a smaller BM ERC (Havent submitted clourt claim yet and wont in all honesty after this charade !)

Iam also claiming 350 charges back from HALIFAX bank charges, at LBA Stage (BM all part of HBOS as you are all aware)

where do you suggest i start negotiating? what i propbably need to know is what their likley costs would be to go to court on this court date set on the 21st March. I have noted Zoots comments above and reluctantly agree that i need to try and salavage some sort of settlement here prior to court.

What are thy likley to be spending in terms of probably referring the matter to D.L.Piper and costs of barristers on the day. i need to try and use this before contacting them tomorrow with a view to my salvaging operation. (tomorrow being the day the solicitor comes back off her hols) God i hate the birmingham mids ! and the courts even more. All help ,guidance and advice would be welcomed.My only ammunition now is to convince them to settle to avoid the costs theyd be incuring in the hearing date. HELP !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Biffa, I would stay on target with this and wait for them to submit their bundle. Any costs will be added to any Judgement.

 

Ask yourself again, why are they delaying?

 

I'm right on your tail with my claim against them.

 

JMHO, but I'd wait to see what their defense is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...