Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • it's 85k of turnover (well, now £90k). However, you're digging yourself into another hole here. That ship has probably long since sailed. Is it worth pursuing this? You're not going to get anything back from it either way.
    • Hi,   A few pointers from yesterday to take note of evris cpr 27.9 failed again so we should really make issue of this also their WX fail to comply with CPR so again we should take issue with their statement of truth  you cant get tort if you get damages under subsection 7 of CRA because its double recovery  - not sure what we think of this? however its the first time i saw the judges make reference to your non automatic rights from s49 which s54 and 57 assist with. We should start stating this specifically for claims as I think its much better than just 49 and 57 as we need to make it clear where our non automatic rights come from as 54 automatic frankly dont help  I have sent the claim form and defences to the admin email because I can’t upload them for some reason as it wont let me but thought this may help as its the first time we’ve taken tort to trial. although i think the DDJ was honestly struggling to understand some parts of the law because he was asking me about them and how he should interpret them, especially for the automatic. Will apply for transcript if you want it?
    • I decided on confrontation - which I hate.  Omg the arrogance of the driver.  They refused to say who had given them the alleged permission to park on the private land - unless I proved ownership.  I couldn't believe they could be so objectionable.   They advised they couldn't take public transport to work as they lived too far away.  They couldn't rent a local garage as none were available. I simply said that's their issue not mine. It was infuriating that this person had such misplaced entitlement.  However I decided to humour them and show them the title deeds.   They couldn't respond.  Although at this point they alleged some guy in a city up north - whose name they couldn't remember - gave permission!!    They then asked if they could buy the garages and land!! Yet can't afford to park on a meter !! They seemed to back down and agree to now park elsewhere.  I hope so. 
    • I've worked out the contractor invoiced apx 250k - Without adding vat to the invoices.  So based on above he should have added vat to all invoices once he reached 85k?  Obviously he had to pay his labourers - would those payments get taken off what he received?  Or it doesn't matter cos he invoiced for the high sum?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Littlewoods email address


Clear33
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3722 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Does anyone know of the CEO of Littlewoods email address?

 

I am a disabled customer and am being discriminated against.

 

After a year of complaints and getting nowhere i need to write to management.

 

They wont give me the CEO address. I have just written to tell them i am witholding minimum payment until they resolve this.

 

Clear33

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have moved your post and started a thread of your own, that other one was a few years old.

 

Click on this link if you can find it, http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?418095-Littlewoods-email-address

 

the subject is 'Littlewoods email address'. If you would like the subject heading change, just say so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

What it is is this.

 

It probably doesnt seem like anything to ordinary folk.

k

When I was severely ill and bedbound I checked with Littlewoods that they would adhere to the 'special delivery instructions'.

 

these were noted on my file. it was to 1) not knock and 2)to walk straight down the drive and leave parcels in the place i later called the 'authorised delivery/collection point'.

 

i used littlewoods because of their home delivery and becsuse my friend said he would be happy to pay the monthly bill. therefore i regained a sense of personal freedom and could get much needed basic items without having to ask.

 

when i was able, i would go outside and bring in my parcel and it felt great.

 

the problems started when the delivery people ignored the instructions.

 

countless times they knocked. this had an adverse condition on my health and set the dogs barking.

 

they walked all over my property, on one occassion they parked on my drive for 5minutes. on another they left the oily parcels stacked up against my car - left thick oil marks on my car and on the door handle. i had to send one item back too as it was oil damaged.

 

each and every time, i was emailed and reassured that it wouldnt happen again. but each time it did. despite being told they were trespassing if they went anywhere other than straight down my drive - they continued to do it. they knew i was disabled and unable to get to the door - and i reassured them the authorised delivery point is a safe place.

 

despite being told not to disturb my elderly neighbour - they kept on doing it. she ended up having to lug over heavy pacel the wall. and left it where it should have been initially left.

 

on one occassion i made it to the window and pointed to the delivery driver to leave the parcel - he would not! he walked off with it. the next day it was delivered in the correct way without incident.

 

since then there was 5 arranged collections of a parcel and 5 times they didnt show. it was only after countless complaints that finally the 20second job was completed as they walked down the drive and collected the parcel.

 

i have asked littlewoods for £100 compensation for prolonged poor service causing damage and distress. also misleading me into buying from them stating they would adhere to the special delivery instructions - only for them not to.

 

They have told me they dont pay for distress and asked me if the damage to my car is permanent. it is not permanent .

 

does anyone have any light to shed on this situation?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is an agreement Littlewoods made to a disabled person that was broken countless times.

 

when i do not pay them on time, it doesnt cost them anything either and yet they charge me for it.

 

 

If Littlewoods had said we will deliver to you and:

 

knock on all your windows and doors, hang around on your property, put thick oil over your car, disturb your elderly neighbour, leave parcels in unknown places on your property so you have to go looking for them as we dont bother posting you a card, have you fall over on one occassion because we left a parcel in an unauthorised place that didnt have a wall to lean on to get to....and the majority of time after disturbing you we will just leave again with the parcels not delivered at all or on time leaving you to make further arrangements....

 

then my answer would have been, er, no thankyou!.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am unfamiliar with the compensation stuff.

 

 

i would have expected to have been compensated for my loss of time due to all the additional correspondence....my health did genuinely suffer also which was why the delivery instructions were in place.

also loss of the actual items which were supposed to be delivered on a specific date but where not.

loss of my car free from oil on its paintwork.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am unfamiliar with the compensation stuff.

 

 

i would have expected to have been compensated for my loss of time due to all the additional correspondence....my health did genuinely suffer also which was why the delivery instructions were in place.

also loss of the actual items which were supposed to be delivered on a specific date but where not.

loss of my car free from oil on its paintwork.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Happily resolved :)

 

Littlewoods have credited my account and more importantly to me, are in the process of restructuring their entire communications protocols as flaws were found. So all this should never happen again.

 

They thanked me for bringing this to their attention and i am grateful to them for listening.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...