Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Bryan carter - Lowells - 3 mobile debt I do not recall - Court form help please.


OAAJmum
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3776 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I had this form through a few weeks ago. (21st of Jan is date) Its a blue court form which I assumed was just another debt collecter spam mail thing. I've now found out differently and having looked up various threads here thought it best to ask what to do.

 

Firstly I've never had a 3 Mobile Phone, Hubby has but this form is in my name so its likely the debt is incorrectly assigned or just wrong.

 

Im going to defend via moneyclaim, do I go with the CPR letter requesting documents and put defense as awaiting documents as I have no recollection of this debt?

 

Wording on the form is as follows:-

 

I'm being a little vague to prevent them from Id ing me.

 

This claim is for £300ish the amount due under an agreement between orig creditor and defendant to provide finance/services or goods

 

This debt was assigned/ purchased by lowel on XX/XX/2011 and notice severed pursuant toproperty act 1925

 

Particulars

Three mobile

Account number : XXXXXXXXXXXX

 

Claimant claims £300ish

 

Claimant also claims interest pursuant to s69 county court act 1984 from XX/XX2011 to date at 8% per annum amounting to £50ish

 

**************************

 

I know I only have days to submit defense what do I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can ask for strict proof of debt and I would be doing a SAR with 3 mobile and tell BC that you are doing so and may wish to recover damages from them as the debt is not yours. Check your credit files and see if, when and who put the debt on your credit file as that is where your damages claim comes from.

So, your defence will be that you have never been a customer of 3 mobile and that the debt is denied in its entirety. The burden of proof lies with BC/Lowells so make them sweat.

Also do a SAR on Lowells and make it clear that the cost of doing so will be part of a claim against them. They may ask for some proof of ID and then it will dawn on them that they have the wrong person and hope you will accept an apology and not take them to court/regulatory body/press etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as you file a defence fairly sharpish it doesnt have to be detailed, all of that will be added when you get the allocation documents. The defence of you not being the debtor and never having anything to do with 3 will cause them a certain amount of alarm but this is just giving you time to get all of the other information from them before you have to go to court. There will be then plenty of time for Lowell's to get you the info and discontinue if they have got it all wrong. Dont let them off the hook if you are right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If hte date of issue of hte claim form is 21st January then your timeline is as follows:

 

Date of issue = 21.01.2014 + 5 days for service = 25.01.2014 + 14 days to acknowledge = 08.02.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 22 .02.2014.

 

Have you acknowledged receipt of the claim online ?

 

I would have thought if the debt is not yours then a simple defence denying any knowledge, something along the lines of..

 

It is denied that the defendant has ever had a contract with either the MOBILE phone company or Claimant.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...