Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, firstly thank you for reading this. I know no one wants a long winded back story. So I’ll be breif. I entered a local store to buy some paint (which I did pay for) I am honestly not a bad person or a theif.   Didn’t have a basket or trolly as was on my lunch break. Whilst picking up the three tubs of paint placed some masking tape in my pocket (it was hanging out of so I had every intention to pay) just didn’t have a hand free. Paid for my goods (forgot about the £4.39 masking tape) I’ve got so much going on and im not well at all (like I say no one cares I get that) also have autism so wasn’t thinking particularly like others do maybe (who knows my minds going around and around) I left the store after paying, was pulled back in by security. Asked for the tape which I gave immediately  shook up. Gave them my ID and details. I was given some paper and told to expect a large fine in the post for their time and the tape and sent on my way. my questions are: I hardly ever go out without support so the ban I guess I can’t go there now for anything (their loss) - ok but is my photo going to be all over with my name? how much am I expecting in the post as a fine? I have sent them cash in the post recorded signed for delivery to arrive tomorrow (incident happened today) for my error. Their Address was on the bit of paper. i have read two posts on this page but they were from many many years ago so I hoped for updated advise please? 
    • V important you read lots of BMW threads too !  
    • So should I send them a new SAR and put my date of birth on it? Or do I need to send them some proof? Driving license? 
    • Thanks so much for your help!! I've emailed them, and when they reply saying they can't do it I'll reply and state my rights. I'm so glad I found this forum, and will read all of the posts I can find and help guides available for the future. Really can't thank you enough.
    • utter BS, doesn't matter you signed it. pers i'd be writing as per the other threads here rejecting the car as not as described under CRA etc and be done with it. as its a debit card you could also do a full chargeback within 120 days to your bank and simply dump the car back to BMW. 100's of like threads to read here. get your ducks inline. make sure you know what you are doing and off you go. dont take any BS from BMW, no matter what you sign it does NOT remove your consumer rights. p'haps it might be on the off chance you are a good manager , a quick phonecall tomorrow saying you dont want it because (no bla bla fitted) it might be resolved in 5 mins..i will guess to date you not tried
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

capquest chasing RBS debt i've not paid in +5yrs - scotland


bonnie30
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3750 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there

 

Cap quest have been calling and messaging me for months now with regards to a 11 year old debt with RBS.

 

I set up a payment with with Capquest 6 years ago,

but I haven't paid anything to them in over five years.

 

The bank account was opened in Scotland and I'm now living in Scotland.

 

Cap quest are arguing that it's six years statue barred rule in England and I live in Scotland now?

 

Although I was living in London when I made my last payment to them.

 

Can you advise if it is statue barred or not please?

 

I have never been so harassed by anyone but them.

 

I have a small baby and I'm really at the end of the road with worry.

 

Is this still enforceable.

 

I sent Capquest a letter that they received explaining that I was living in Scotland.

 

Please help?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you've been resident in Scotland for more than 3mts

5yrs SB is correct.

 

debt is gone DEAD parrot. extinguished

no matter where you took it out

 

send the Scottish SB letter from the library tab top left.

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not an expert on Scottish matters

 

however as the account was opened in Scotland I'm sure that Scottish law would apply.

 

In any event, if they were to take you to court it would have to be in Scotland as that's where you live

- they can't issue proceedings in England.

 

I would write a final letter to them,

sent recorded delivery so they can't deny receiving it,

saying the account was opened in Scotland and is therefore subject to Scottish law

and therefore no longer exists, and if they want to argue otherwise they should let the court decide.

 

State that you will not enter into any further correspondence and that if they continue to contact you

it will be considered harrassment and reported to the OFT and FOS.

 

Then ignore their messages and if you answer the phone just refuse the security questions and hang up.

 

Unless it's a huge amount they will give up fairly quickly.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

own thread created.

 

for ref, the law applied is where you reside.

 

a debt taken out in Scotland is NOT SB'dafter 5yrs if you are resident south of the boarder

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you! I send them a letter notifying them in my change in address four months ago and that I'm now living in Scotland. I'm no longer registered at my old London address but they are still sending mail there Care Of. Should I request that no correspondence is sent to that address at all?

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope noting further to do.

 

just keep an eye on your cra file.

 

they are not unknown to purposefully serve papers to an old address.

 

just be aware there is 'speculation' upon when a bank account becomes statute barred.

 

if or if not you pay attention to this is your bag.

 

we at cag are .minded. to believe it could be when the original creditor could have first

called the debt in. poss your third missed payment.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. Just one more question. Can they issue a CCJ to my old address? I've not confirmed my new Scottish address as I don't want harassed with mail at my parents. How would I manage this?? Thank you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Loan, Credit Card and similar.

 

1-> Cause of action is when the terms of the contract (agreement) are breached.

 

2-> LA timings start from the breach date i.e. when the creditor could/is able/can start the process needed to get their money. The right to start the process accrues to them at the date of the breach.

 

3-> The fact that they may choose not to start that process straight away has no effect on the clock. For example, if they choose not to start that process for three months after the breach then they have not extended the Limitation period by three months.

 

4-> While there is a procedural bar imposed on them, this does not affect the clock.

 

5-> What failures on the conduct of a debtor which would be a breach are contained within the Terms of the contract and in order to establish absolutely the SB date then the debtor will need to consult the terms.

 

6-> The clock does not start from the date of the last payment made, it starts from the date of the breach of contract.

 

7-> The date on which a default is registered with a credit reference agency is a completely separate issue to the LA debate.

 

Overdrafts.

 

As above really. The cause of action would still be the date of a breach of any contract. If such a contract exists the debtor should refer to those to establish the breach date and go from there.

 

If there is no such agreement then the clock will start from the date on which the bank formally request repayment.

 

The SB date for an overdraftlink3.gif may not be easy to establish as it will all be down to what records/agreements/letters etc. are available to find out what the terms of the overdraft were.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Thank you. Just one more question.

 

Can they issue a CCJ to my old address?

 

I've not confirmed my new Scottish address as I don't want harassed with mail at my parents.

 

How would I manage this?? Thank you!

 

yes you must legally inform them

 

else they can and will serve to your old address

 

are you on voters?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry what's my CRA file?

 

credit file

 

see below

 

you need to ENSURE you present address is shown as your current address

 

and you old one shows in linked addresses.

 

get that cra file [try noddle its free]

 

and tell us the default date for the debt in question please

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...