Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HFC / HSBC sells off debt to Lowells


Lokur
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3373 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The default was on my credit file, but expired in January/February this year.

So when was the last payment and/or written acknowledgment of this debt?

 

 

I looks like Lowlife a chancing their arm again, the debt is probably already SB or nearly so, that's the reason for the 70% discount.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The Debt is statute barred as of 2nd December in 3 months.

Based on default date or last payment lokur?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Based on default date or last payment lokur?

 

Last payment.

 

The debt defaulted over 6 years ago when I unfortunately lost my job as many did in those days after the credit crunch started hitting. I got new employment and started payments up again, and the last payment on account was December 01 2008 and I disputed the account with HFC.

 

I recieved a letter from HFC which told me that they might have added PPI to my loan without giving me the terms and conditions, and offered to have it removed. But when I called up to take them up on this offer I was told no, and this is the reason I disputed the debt and stopped paying.

 

Forgot to mention: I forgot cancel the direct debit, so there was a bounced payment in January and February in 2009, which shows up on the accounts as payment/reversal of payment. The reason they bounced was that I was the victim of identity fraud and my account was emptied out over christmas that year. HSBC who I was banking with refunded me all the bounced DD charges and the stolen moneys 6 months later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last payment.

 

The debt defaulted over 6 years ago when I unfortunately lost my job as many did in those days after the credit crunch started hitting. I got new employment and started payments up again, and the last payment on account was December 01 2008 and I disputed the account with HFC.

 

I recieved a letter from HFC which told me that they might have added PPI to my loan without giving me the terms and conditions, and offered to have it removed. But when I called up to take them up on this offer I was told no, and this is the reason I disputed the debt and stopped paying.

 

 

Best to string Lowlife on for 3 months then, 70% discount so close to SB bl**dy cheek.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best to string Lowlife on for 3 months then, 70% discount so close to SB bl**dy cheek.

 

Anything I should do to string them along? Ask any questions, or just ignore them? They could in theory take me to court before then right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anything I should do to string them along? Ask any questions, or just ignore them? They could in theory take me to court before then right?

In theory yes, but as nothing has been done in all this time highly unlikely now.

Lowell are not shy about litigation is they believe they have even a fair chance of

success.

Ignore I think!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

id wait for it to go SB and reclaim PPI.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just had another letter from Red stating they are now escalating it to Hampton legal with a recommendation to apply for a CCJ.

 

Then it goes on about the ramifications of a CCJ.

 

Threatogram?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had another letter from Red stating they are now escalating it to Hampton legal with a recommendation to apply for a CCJ.

 

Then it goes on about the ramifications of a CCJ.

 

Threatogram?

 

 

Passed to the next desk in Lowell's den of iniquity, wait and see what Hamptons have to say.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

bloke at the next desk in a diff coloured skirt.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know that it's the next bloke down the line, but I've not seen that line before: Our recommendation to Hampton Legal is to apply for a CCJ.

 

Just wanted to know if anyone else have seen that, and if they actually went through with it as I now have 2.5 months away from a statute barring of this disputed debt (Dispute with original creditor re PPI).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know that it's the next bloke down the line, but I've not seen that line before: Our recommendation to Hampton Legal is to apply for a CCJ.

 

Just wanted to know if anyone else have seen that, and if they actually went through with it as I now have 2.5 months away from a statute barring of this disputed debt (Dispute with original creditor re PPI).

Hamptons are likely to farm this to one of the tame solicitors (Bryan Carter instance) to issue a claim so a little more time will be wasted there.

 

 

Looking back to July Lowell were threatening court action within 7days and nothing has happened.

 

 

What has Lowell produced to support their claim?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there anything I can do to slow this down, I really don't want to deal with this in court.

 

 

This seems to be going in the usual circle of "escalations" to various departments of Lowell more often than not after Hamptons

the debt gets back to Lowell's ordinary collections activity.

 

 

How much is the debt for? To take it to court it has to be financially viable, but I think the discount offers indicate desperation to get something before it becomes SB.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The debt is for ~£8000, there is a PPI attached to the debt, and I had a letter from Original Creditor stating they would remove the PPI as they had not given me the terms and conditions when the loan was taken out. But when I contacted Original Creditor about this they point blank refused and I put the debt in formal dispute.

 

Last payment on account was December 1st 2008.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The debt is for ~£8000, there is a PPI attached to the debt, and I had a letter from Original Creditor stating they would remove the PPI as they had not given me the terms and conditions when the loan was taken out. But when I contacted Original Creditor about this they point blank refused and I put the debt in formal dispute.

 

Last payment on account was December 1st 2008.

Agreed to refund PPI and then refused to do so?

Nothing more from the OC since the dispute was raised?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didnt know about the PPI really as it was tackled on without me realising,

and being stupid enough not to read through the documents properly.

 

 

when I got a letter from them saying our internal routines shows that you might not have had

the PPI terms and conditions through we're offering you to cancel it.

 

 

when I asked the local branch to do just that,

they point blank refused no matter how much i waved the letter.

 

 

I disputed it and refused to pay the debt going forward. This was roughly in December 2008.

 

I had a default letter through years ago, but no real attempts to contact me

no phone calls, no letters.

 

 

I had a letter from a DCA asking for £25k a few years ago which they had calculated based on 30+% interest or something, I just ignored that one.

 

I've also held a savings account with more money than the debt with HSBC which owns the OC (HFC) as I didn't know they could offset.

 

 

My current account, ISA, Credit cards and regular saving account is all with HSBC (First Direct) so It's not like I've tried to hide.

 

I believe in paying back what I owe, but I think I have a genuine dispute here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didnt know about the PPI really as it was tacked on without me realising, and being stupid enough not to read through the documents properly. So when I got a letter from them saying our internal routines shows that you might not have had the PPI terms and conditions through we're offering you to cancel it. So when I asked the local branch to do just that, they point blank refused no matter how much i waved the letter. So I disputed it and refused to pay the debt going forward. This was roughly in December 2008.

 

I had a default letter through years ago, but no real attempts to contact me no phone calls, no letters. I had a letter from a DCA asking for £25k a few years ago which they had calculated based on 30+% interest or something, I just ignored that one.

 

I've also held a savings account with more money than the debt with HSBC which owns the OC (HFC) as I didn't know they could offset. My current account, ISA, Credit cards and regular saving account is all with HSBC (First Direct) so It's not like I've tried to hide.

 

I believe in paying back what I owe, but I think I have a genuine dispute here.

 

 

 

Did you get a Final Response Letter from the bank after raising the complaint?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you get a Final Response Letter from the bank after raising the complaint?

 

I don't think I did. I certainly can't remember seeing one. I did move around a lot back then, but I kept HSBC up to date with my address. I don't know how well they share information between each branch of the bank though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

my neighbour has had about 25 of those exact letters.

 

 

sit tight.

 

 

nothing you can really do or need too at the present with it.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest, politely, you fo back to post one and re-read your thread.

 

 

everytime you get a threat-o-gram

you panic...don't.

 

 

you need to p'haps address your PPI paperwork and get that checked here ready to send it all.

 

 

no dca offers a 70% discount when they could goto court for 100%

 

 

think about it!

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...