Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HFC / HSBC sells off debt to Lowells


Lokur
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3373 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear all,

 

I just recieved a letter from Lowell financial stating they had bought a debt,

along with a letter from HSBC (HFC) saying they had sold it.

 

The stated amount was ~£8000. (Both letters was in same envelope,

 

I assume Lowell has been granted permission to write the letter from HSBC)

 

The debt in question was opened 2007, and within a year contested as there was a PPI attached

that I never had asked for, nor would cover me as I was a contractor at the time.

 

They stopped chasing me as I kept contesting the debt due to PPI.

 

It was defaulted in 2009.

 

They have not contacted me since.

 

I've been banking with HSBC ever since so they have always known where I have been living,

and they have given me a credit card and £3000 on overdraft since.

 

I've never once not paid back these every month

 

I've been what would be seen a model customer,

except for refusing to pay the debt which had a mis-sold PPI attached

 

The Original loan was for roughly £5000 and the PPI attached was about £2000

 

I think I paid £350-400 a month for 7-8 months till I realised the PPI was on there

and that it was also not possible to claim on due to being a contracter

 

I believe HSBC just sold off a lot of debt to Lowell,

I guess I have been caught in the flood

 

Lowell have not sent me a chase for the debt yet,

just a letter saying they now own it.

 

What should I do at this stage,

bearing in mind this debt is probably going to be statute barred in less than a year?

 

Sincerely yours,

 

Lokur

Edited by Lokur
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

did you ever get the PPI back

 

 

prob wipe the debt out now.

 

 

have you all the statements and the agreement?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I never had the PPI payments returned.

 

As they haven't chased for near 5 years,

I didn't bother with a PPI claim I figured it would eventually get statute barred and I'm happy either way.

 

I believe I have the original agreement, but I won't have all the statements.

 

I do know I have some.

 

P.S. How did you format my post, I tried 3 times to add spaces...

Link to post
Share on other sites

hit the multi coloured AAaa icon top left first before pasting the text.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so when did you last pay them?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so's not statute barred then.

 

i'd get an sar off to HFC and get the statements.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I would guess the default that was on the account has reached its 6th birthday?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I was under the impression the default was just 5 years,

 

but I could be wrong and that it would come off end of this year 2014.

 

However,

 

I've not had any answer to my SAR at HFC.

 

My cheque for £10 has not been cashed either.

 

However I just had a letter from Lowell, offering the following:

 

Full and final, with 25% discount.

 

Or Pay £60 a month till it's paid off.

 

I've yet to discuss this debt with Lowell in any way,

 

while waiting the outcome of my SAR.

 

Lokur

Link to post
Share on other sites

discount offers usually mean there is something WRONG with the debt.

 

i'd ring HFC and ask about your SAr request

 

what is going on with it.

 

they have 40 days.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It says I have 21 days to respond to their offer, should I send them a letter or just ignore for now? I've read on here they have been quite trigger happy with court issues, I'd rather it not go to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you call the shots not them!!

 

a DCA is NOT A BAILIFF

 

and have

no such legal powers..

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

all dca letters are designed in one way or another

to frighten people

or entice people to contact them

 

so you can then be told a whole load of lies and rubbish

over the phone that if they put in a letter

 

they'd get closed down for

 

this is why the authorities are making it compulsory for them to record EVERY call as from april

 

thts why lowlife like lowells

are sending out as many threats and 'spoof' court claims

as they can

to get them through court hoping the defendant ignores the claim

 

and they win by default,

75% of the money DCA's EARN they have no legal right too at all.

 

and goes straight into the profit bin

to further fund the harassment of 100'000's of more people

on debts they most prob do not even owe.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Still no statements from HFC. I had a letter from Red stating they where taking me to court. I sent a letter back asking them to prove the debt, I've had a letter back stating my account is on hold till they can prove it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I've just had a letter from Lowell with a signed agreement, and a letter stating that all the statements are to follow in a separate cover.

 

I'll scan these up as soon as they arrive.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

No response to SAR, and no statements arrived yet.

 

I've had a signed agreement through.

 

I've no idea what is taking so long...can't be that hard to print off some statements from their computer system?

 

-Lokur

Link to post
Share on other sites

so did you ring hfc as advised back in feb and ask them where the data is?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I did, the person in question said they where struggling to find all the documents as they had been archived and that they would be with me shortly.

 

They have not cashed the cheque either.

 

@DX quick question, if HFC charges my HSBC account the payment, and then HSBC retracts the payment as there is no coverage (By direct debit) does that count as a payment towards statute barred limitations?

 

-Lokur

Link to post
Share on other sites

payment for what?

 

hfc/hsbc are the same bank

 

if the debt has been sold to lowells

then they cant off set

 

if that's what you mean

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I went over my old HSBC statements, and

 

in November 2008 I made a payment to HFC on the loan,

 

then HSBC recalled the payment due to not enough money in the account.

 

This happened again in December and January when i cancelled the Direct Debit.

 

Would the statute barring be from January 2009 or from the last real payment?

 

-Lokur

Link to post
Share on other sites

typically the SB clock for loans begins to tick from when the OC 'could' have gone legal

this normally equates to the issuing of a default notices' date.

 

which 'should' be issued following the third missed payment.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The default was issued over 6 years ago,

but I made payments after the default notice,

after i lost my job I couldn't pay,

 

it was defaulted and

 

after a while I got a new job and started paying.

 

I stopped paying again as a result of finding out there was a PPI insurance on the loan

that I hadn't asked for, didn't want, and hadn't received any Terms and conditions for.

 

I Disputed the debt and demanded that it was taken off before I would pay anything.

 

I have not heard a word from HFC since re this debt untill it was sold to Lowell.

 

The default is definitely cleared from my credit file now.

 

-Lokur

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Just had the statement true from Lowell along with a letter.

 

The letter states that Lowell and HFC see no reason this debt shouldn't be paid and that they reserve the right to issue court proceedings within 7 days without further notice.

 

The statement show that the last payment on account was December 2008.

 

I'll scan the statement and the agreement up.

 

I think technically they can't assign the debt to Lowell due to the dispute, but I'm not sure how strong a defence that really is?

 

-Lokur

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...