Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Alternative to Energy Ombudsman for problem with Scottish Power


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3873 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Has anyone had any success dealing with Scottish Power with any alternative remedy to the Energy Ombudsman, please?

 

I'm helping out a seriously ill friend whose bills have got in a mess over a number of year

he's been in and out of hospital with various internal organs packing up.

 

I've been trying to disentangle his energy bills which is through Scottish Power

which he had no choice about as it was mandatory as part of his rental.

 

It's all very convoluted but comes down to them refusing repeatedly to amend the billing address to make sure he received bills,

failing to provide any tariff information at all

and simply applying whatever tariff at any one time was the most advantageous for them, and

 

now it turns out that the meter readers he was letting into the property (which is a redeveloped mill with many apartments)

weren't in fact reading the meters at all so the bills have been estimated.

 

Not getting the bills means he's not been able to draw down any of the discounts he'd have been entitled to

and he's now being billed for usage they can't prove he ever used.

 

While this complaint has been ongoing, even though I'm Court-appointed as his representative

they won't use my address or contact to resolve this,

have ignored offers to pay,

and have passed the account while in dispute and with the Ombudsman to debt collection agents who keep ringing him on a mobile number

Scottish Power have told the Ombudsman they've never had

when I personally have been fielding up to 10 calls a day from Scottish Power and its agents to that number.

 

The Energy Ombudsman's view is that Scottish Power don't and still don't have to amend the address even though that would mean that him,

as one of the parties to the contract, would actually receive bills for the service they're trying to charge for.

 

They also say that Scottish Power can charge whatever they want without him agreeing or seeing tariffs when surely he is entitled to clear, accurate and timely bills.

 

They say it doesn't matter that there's no proof of what energy he's used, he has to pay it anyway.

 

I genuinely don't understand that at all,

when any supply is between two parties and must be equitable.

 

My view is that he should have to pay what he's used but not for what they can't prove was him

and could've been earlier tenants,

he shouldn't be charged high tariffs he never agreed to in the first place,

he should be allowed the discounts they've deprived him of.

 

With the harassment on top of this, and their steadfast refusal to try and get the matter sorted in a way that's equitable to both sides of the contract,

my inclination is to take Scottish Power to Court to get it sorted.

 

Has anyone tried this, or been able to get other mediation involved to get it sorted fairly?

 

Any help much appreciated, ta,

Claire

Link to post
Share on other sites

Claire we have a good Scottish power rep onboard here

 

i'll alert them to pop in for you

 

they normally get things sorted for users here.

 

ah..edit: its the one we cant get ahold of recently...i'll try though for you.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...