Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Has anyone replied as advised to a Paploc from J&P and had any follow up or developments? I've read on other threads about cases of people ignoring paplocs  from J&P with no further action, or in some cases, the messaging reverted, but I can't seem to find cases of the opposite (ie replying to paplocs) I know the advice on here is not to ignore paplocs, but just wondering if there was much evidence about J&P taking court action. I've experience of a previous debt being chased via Moriarty (ADCB) and it was widely reported Moriarty wouldn't attend, and they discontinued my case. Less sure about J&P, hence the question.   I haven't decided which course of action to take yet (ie reply to paploc or not), still evaluating but haven't found many J&P threads, conscious there could always be a first time. For record, I have been receiving IDR on and off for a few years, then a few months back J&P took over, with sms/emails and then a few weeks back I received email notification from ENBD "appointment of third party collection agency" Thanks in advance for any feedback.  
    • Doc 06-18-2024 10-56-27.pdf Good morning DX 24th went well. Claim dismissed and expenses awarded. Sheriff did not grant absolvitor when i requested. It was all about no name, no wet signature & e- signature/tick box.  Im in Forfar today so will call into clerk’s office for assistance with expenses claim   thank you again for all your help  much much appreciated  UCM   Doc 06-18-2024 10-56-27.pdf Good morning DX 24th went well. Claim dismissed and expenses awarded. Sheriff did not grant absolvitor when i requested. It was all about no name, no wet signature & e- signature/tick box.  Im in Forfar today so will call into clerk’s office for assistance with expenses claim   thank you again for all your help  much much appreciated  UCM  
    • She is absolutely right! As soon as a hearing date is set we will prepare this for her, and more.
    • So what happened in this case?
    • make sure you get a copy of the particulars of claim from the original claimform. dx
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Idem now purchased +10yrs old Lloyds Credit card debt - want I+E details?


Simon0711
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3882 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there. I am here for some advice!

I have many debts in long term default,

for some time now I have had agreements with my lenders or their debt collection agencys

amicably paying back affordable monthly ammounts.

 

A few months ago one of the smaller and older of these debts

a Lloyds credit card which had defaulted over 10 years ago

and since paid back over a very long time at 5 pounds a month

with approximately 400 pounds left to pay was aquired by debt buyers Idem servicing.

 

There are many threads about them here detailing similar experiences.

 

their hallmark seems to be the stubborn insistance that the debtee fill in an exhaustive income expenditure form

before they will discuss anything.

 

I am not inclined to do this, I am aware they cannot legally require this.

 

I want to offer them a slightly improved repayment agreement via standing order without completing

this somewhat insulting and invasive form.

 

From what I have read here they will refuse and make threats to pass it on to their in house CCA Arden.

 

As such my question is legally what can they do???

Can they put a debt already defaulted many years ago back onto my credit file?

 

They are now cranking up the pressure with phone calls (as late as 20.40) and innumerable texts.

 

some pertinent facts of the case.

1. They are now the legitimate owners of this debt (confirmed in writing from Llloyds).

2. The debt is not currently on my credit file (checked)

3. The debt is not statute barred as it has been consistantly paid (albeit at a token ammount)

 

many thanks in adance!

Simon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG

 

Typical DCA tactic. Threats to pass you on to their oh so scary in house DCA. Toothless bovine excrement.

 

In the library is a letter telling them to stop phoning you. In the meantime (and if you have the facility) record their drivel. You don't have to tell them you are recording. Catch them out with their 'mistruths'

 

One default-period. If they try to add it again, you can sue them if they refuse to remove it.

 

As for the I&E, tell them in no uncertain terms to go forth. They have no entitlement to it-ever!

 

Deal in writing only and make sure you get proof of posting/delivery

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

as with all you longterm debts

 

you seriously should consider sending anyone you pay a CCA request.

 

I bet very few have the required paperwork to enforce payment after all this time.

 

DCA's will resort to ANY tactics to keep cash cowing you on debts you no longer

or ever did owe to THEM.

 

one tactic is the passing around of debts, here you have some - this mug has been blindly paying us quite nicely for years.

 

the other obv tactic is shouting the loudest, the more pressure they exert, typically,

the less legal right they have to fleece you, as they are trying to divert your attention away from investigating the debt.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...