Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • god they've got at you haven't they. told you all the usual utter BS. a CCJ vanishes from your credit file on it's 6th B'Day regardless to being paid off or not or paying or not. same with any debt with a registered defaulted date - it vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th B'day regardless. creditfix are Knightsbridge, (they renamed) there are 100's of threads here on Knightsbridge, if i remember rightly 2 of the directors of a certain very big IVA provider were struck off for embezzling £1m's out of debtors. pers i'd stop paying now.  end of . just ignore them all. 99% of your debts are to utterly powerless DCA's and probably were never owed in the first place only goes to firm up my belief from post one..you got had blind. its very easy to deal with the debts even those with CCJ's. can you copy and paste what you credit file says regarding the IVA please?   
    • The airline says it is investigating reports that customers can view other passengers' personal information.View the full article
    • They are finding new ways to cut back on household spending as China’s economy loses steam.View the full article
    • Sorry I meant credit fix - I really wish I'd known this before - kicking myself right now  If they come back to me asking for more money I'll cancel it and start trying to deal with the debt myself let's see what they say  Feeling tempted to cancel it now but scared that some of the debts will do more CCJ's on me and I'll have to wait 6 years again.  2 of the CCJ come of this year and then I'll only have the iva in credit file - effectively if I'd have not took out the iva in 2021 I'd have clear score by now - but then again would I because I would have been hounded the last 3 years, as bad as it is it's saves me lots of headaches whilst my debt was still within the 6 year mark.  I think most of them are near there but in all honesty no point chasing them if I do cancel iva I'd jjst wait for the ones who contact me and then start the relevant letter process on them.  Of over 6 years easy if not still possible to write off. My true victory would be having the iva wiped off my credit file as mis sold or something that way I Don't have to wait till 2027 Other option is to fight back and ask for them to offer the creditors to accept payments so far and use the following method    Will your IVA firm agree to complete your IVA on the basic of funds paid to date? The Guidance lists a lot of factors to be considered in deciding whether a settlement on the basis of funds paid to date should be proposed. You should read the list. But that may not give you any feel for whether they apply to you or not. The following are my thoughts on when an IVA should be treated as settled, not failed. They assume that you have £75 or less to pay a month: if you would currently qualify for a Debt Relief Order, then your IVA should be settled now  There is no point in making your IVA fail and you have to apply for a DRO – it will not generate another penny for your creditors. If you are renting and owe less than £50,000, check the DRO criteria now and talk to National Debtline on 0808 808 4000 about whether you qualify. You may have been told at the start of your IVA that you aren’t eligible – still check now as the DRO criteria have changed, your situation has got worse, and some people were given incorrect information about DROs at the start. if you have no assets that would be realised in bankruptcy (eg a house with equity, car worth over £2000), then your IVA should be settled now Same as (1), there is no point in making you apply for bankruptcy after your IVA fails. if your only asset is a car that is worth less than £8000, then your IVA should be settled now A car that is worth say £5000 would normally be sold in bankruptcy and you would be given a small amount to buy a cheaper car. But your creditors would not get any benefit from this as the Insolvency Service takes the first £8000 raised to cover its own costs. if you have significant assets, the closer you are to the end of the IVA, the less reasonable it is to fail it If you have been paying your IVA for 4 years, you have done your best over a long period. It isn’t your fault you can no longer continue. The fact you may have had equity to release isn’t relevant as that simply isn’t going to be possible. if your situation will clearly improve soon, then it’s unlikely your IVA will be settled I mean real improvements, not hoping that prices fall. If I can get them to accept payment to date or threaten with cancellation hopefully they may accept it -  Other option is to try and borrow money and pay make a full and final offer  Or I can just ignore and hope for the best which I'm very tempted to do especially if they respond to my review with bullying tactics despite me being skint as a fart with no mortgage as renting  It's so stressful but I've just checked the iva agreement from 2021 and it's Cabot 2 accounts Lowell about 5 accounts and then lots of repeats of the same debt with for example zopa and Cabot same amount listed twice -  also loyyds banks but I'm sure that's older than 6 years and not on credit file anyway  If I can somehow remove the iva from my credit file I'd be happy 
    • India has one of the world's fastest growing economies but the benefits are yet to fully reach the poorest.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Eviction notice now served.


Capt Slog
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3826 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello anyone. I have posted on another thread under message header NRAM & Wallers as I hadn't seen this thread. Don't know if it is possible for admin bods to move and merge threads please.

Anyway latest news now is that we have been sent an eviction notice, N54, with date of just under 4 weeks from today. Any ideas of how to overcome this. Having read other threads I have already printed out the N244 and advice sheet. I know we can't do anything courtwise until Monday but at least we will have the weekend to get the rude names for NRAm off our chest. Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your responses. My initial post is on Mortgages and secured loans forum. When we first had the suspended repossession order we were paying a new sum plus an amount towards the arrears. According to the other half, it is in their name and not a joint mortgage, things were OK until August. Due to a finger fault on their part they underpaid by £50. We did not realise this until we got a letter from Wallers saying that has we had not maintained the court order they were going for repossession. Urgent phone calls to NRAM ended with them saying that we had broken the order but they could see that the history was good and that even the following payment was OK. Acting on their advice we waited to see how this under payment could be made up. It seems this is their response. We are in a financial difficulties and we are following much of the advice given out on this site. i.e. getting CCAs from our creditors, or not, which has enabled us budget in a more controlled manner. Now this has come along. Without talking to NRAM I really do not know where to go but the other half seems reluctant and doesn't seem to want to talk about it even to me. Thanks for advice given.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may not need to talk to NRAM. If there's a SPO in place you just need to go ahead and apply on the n244 to seek another suspended order, so long as you can clear the arrears within the rest of the mortgage term you should be good to go (if you're not already aware of it read about Cheltenham & Gloucester v Norgan on that fact sheet I posted up). The court might want to know why the arrangement breached BUT they should be keen to allow you to stay so long as you can meet the arrangements.

 

As far as your 'non-priority' creditors are concerned offer a pound a month to those (if the CCA route hasn't worked for them, of course).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks sequenci. According to the other half the breach occurred because when they entered the amount on the phone keypad they pressed the zero instead of the five. This meant that the payment was £50 pound short that month. Next thing we knew was a letter from Wallers saying NRAM were going for repossession. The usual attempts at phone calls (timed out after how long ringing) and when we did get through the bloke on the other side said even he could see it was a genuine mistake. All payments since the error have been for the full amount, set out by the court when they received the suspended repossession order. We will attempt to fill in N244 this afternoon and take it to the court tomorrow. Thanks again for the help and advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Decided to contact the people who the link above related to and spoke in detail with them, waited for their info to arrive and read through it first. Form has been filled in and we are taking it tomorrow morning. The bod on the helpline did mention to put in about C&G v Norgan but the OH can't remember if it is a loan or the mortgage that is in arrears that we are paying off. Either way we have nothing to lose by stating it I suppose. Can't believe all this hassle over a £48.27 shortfall caused by a simple finger fault. We round the figure up to the nearest £50 so does that mean that we have broken the court agreement right from the beginning? Thanks again for the advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Success!!!!!!!!!!!

First it was the same judge who had given the original suspended possession order so didn't feel too good. The judge then asked why they were seeking the P.O. Their rep went on to say there was a history of 4 missed payments so we were a bad risk. The first time the judge spoke to us he said he wasn't interested in the £50 shortfall in August. He noted that the arrears, which their case was based on, had been greatly reduced to almost half what they had been 3 years ago.The question was asked to their lawyer " Isn't usually when the arrears increase that you seek eviction?"

We then had a chance to show that there had not been any missed payments, but it was down to NRAMs method of taking the money and allocating it, i.e. a two day delay from receiving to allocation. The judge basically said that they were incompetent and he couldn't believe the draconian methods employed by them in pursuit of arrears which had been getting less. He also commented on how their figures didn't match the original PO hearing and for us to check if NRAM have capitalised the arrears, which would make for a new set of figures to be arrived at and possibly the removal of the original P.O.

I ALMOST felt sorry for their rep who didn't have any other notes apart from some docs scanned onto his iPad. Plus he hadn't filled in some paper work before the hearing as he was too busy catching up with another lawyer about life, the universe and everything. Following that I ended up only having to wait a couple of minutes for a bus that runs hourly = Result.

Thanks for all your help, advice and support

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...