Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello I hope someone can give me some advice here, as I am at a bit of a loss on how to proceed. This relates to alleged offences under the RTA. Yesterday I received a notification from the local police of intention to prosecute for the following offences: 1 driving without due care and attention 2 failing to stop at a road traffic accident 3 failing to report a road traffic accident At this stage they have only asked me to say whether I was the driver at the time or not and provided a blank sheet of paper to give information about the incident. Going by the location (just round the corner from where I live) I can only imagine this relating to one recent incident, which wasn't actually an accident but more of a road rage event. I was driving past someone unloading or working next to his lorry which had stopped in the road. I wasn't going fast or anything, while I went by lorry man turned around and punched and kicked my car whilst going past him. I stopped and got out and wanted to know what he thought he was doing punching and kicking my car. He then hurled some verbal abuse at me, swearing and he was quite aggressive. I still didn't know what his problem was and said I would report him to his company for threatening behaviour and vandalism for punching my car. I got my phone and tried to take a photo of his lorry and number plate but at that moment he came right at me, still shouting and swearing, so I was worried he may hit me next, as he already punched my car. I thought if the guy hits me I will come off second best, so I decided to retreat. I quickly got back into my car and left. When I checked my phone later the photo I tried to take was blurred and useless, so I thought it was pointless to report the incident to the police, as the guy would not be traceable. Over that I forgot about it until I got the letter yesterday in the post. This is the only thing I believe this can relate to, but I have no idea based on what the three above allegations come from There was no road traffic accident, more of a road rage incident. So I am at a loss what to do. I have 28 days to respond. Should I just say yes I was the driver and was there and see what happens next, or should I already make a written statement on the attached piece of paper they sent me and send that with it ? Is there anyone here who would have a rough idea what to do next ? I tried my legal advice line through my Union, but they have sent me from pillar to post, now say it needs to go to a different department again and that would be chargeable as the RTA comes under Criminal Law. So any advice would be appreciated Many Thanks
    • So a quick update got bounced around two different departments and managed to speak to a DVLA bod , explained the situation and they could see the overlap and that DD payments had been made from Feb , also no formal remiders prior , they gave me a number for the legal dept who I am calling this morning to see what they can do in terms of the SJP notice , still have time to submit this online.  Will update after my chat this morning 
    • Also, I am trying to understand how invoicing a large sum in a 6m period becomes tax fraud?   Is it because if he had invoiced over the £85k threshold he should have been obligated to charge vat?  Which would have meant hmrc would have benefited from the vat amount? So by not charging it Hmrc have lost out on £s revenue?  Is that what makes it tax fraud? So as a self-employed contractor, let's say he invoiced one Co for 200k.  Should he have charged vat on the full 200k (£40k)? Or just on the sum above the threshold (£23k)?  And that by not charging vat, he has knowingly withheld tax £s from Hmrc? And is the payer complicit ?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

ESA submission


John B/ham
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3870 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Also i cant get my head around things she wrote in the report , such as my brother visits every week, i havent seen him since nans funeral in 2007, an i have no problems showering and shaving, when on the day of assesment i'd done neither, i probaly would of if i got up earlier,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

hello all'

ive picked apart the client interview part of the atos report, all its inaccuracies, do i have to do the same in the medical opinion physical and mental as its just the same thing repeated, or is it just the Behaviour Observed During Assesment part ,what she says about what i was able to do or not do, also in the Relevant Features, it says i done things, that one the day i declined to do

thanks john

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning all,

I just found a Ergonomic Report, form a physio, at Queen Elisabeth Hospital that my Disabilty Adviser arranged for me, with his recommendations, and conclusions , but it dates Sept 2000,would this be ok to use in my submission? if so how do i refer to in the submission, or do i just put a copy in for the tribunal to look at?

thank john

Link to post
Share on other sites

John, I have no idea concerning your physical condition. If you have a chronic physical or mental condition you could use that report to demonstrate that your condition as become progressively worse since 2000.

 

In relation to the tribunal you could put a note on stating that your condition is still at the 2000 level or you could put that this document proves that my physical condition is chronic and as become progressively more disabling.

 

Just put how it relates to your appeal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mr mastif,

the conclusion of the report says On assessing John i would recommend he obtain treatment as a matter of urgency with a M R I scan. He as from my assessment damaged and has a protrusion of L3/4 and L4/5 discs. The problem appears to be worsening an is affecting bladder and bowel control

Link to post
Share on other sites

O.K, This is the report from 2000, it would appear that they believe you have a neurogenic bladder/bowel which would indicate that neurological damage as already occurred. It is definitely a chronic condition as there is no cure.

 

If you look at each point of the report and imagine yourself then. Ask the following questions. What as changed? Is my pain the same or as it got worse? Do I now take more pain killers now than I did then. What other medication do I now take that I did not take then.

 

What range of movement did I have in my back then? What can I do now? When my back was at its worse in 2000 what could I do? How long did these bad periods last. What is it like today are my bad periods longer what makes them worse. List all the events that make it worse I.E is it sitting or walking or repetitive movements or do they all make it worse.

 

AS your Bladder/bowel got worse. Imagine you are in an office How far would you need to be from a toilet to maintain your dignity.

 

Use the report as a base line to your condition, state how your condition as progressed. As your back ever gone into spasm causing you to collapse or spill something over yourself. If it as you could be a danger to yourself or others if you were allowed into the work place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello all'

ive picked apart the client interview part of the atos report, all its inaccuracies, do i have to do the same in the medical opinion physical and mental as its just the same thing repeated, or is it just the Behaviour Observed During Assesment part ,what she says about what i was able to do or not do, also in the Relevant Features, it says i done things, that one the day i declined to do

thanks john

 

IF it stated you declined to do something state the reason why. It could be that due to the examination you had not taken certain medications and it would have been too painful. Or if you were on medications for example anxiety that doing the task my have caused you stress or a combination of physical or mental problems.

 

If it states that you have done things and you did not. State that you did not and if relevant say why you could not. For example your assessment said you touched your toes. It would be obvious to the tribunal that due to your problems with your lumber spine you would have great difficulty/pain from doing so.

 

Pick out the points on your ESA50 and assessment that they have got wrong or did not assess. For example you have a lumber spine problem did they examine you legs for signs of muscle atrophy (wasting) what tests were made to determine the damage to the nerves in your back and legs. Did they do any tests. Think about when you have seen your consultant and the tests he as done to determine your condition. Did the atos assessor do them.

Edited by mr_mastiff
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank again mr mastiff,

for replying, and trying your best for me , but things are just not regestering at the min, think i need a break from it all, but i haven't got that luxury,as my submission will have to be posted on monday, i thourght i'd be futher along with it than i actually am, think i'll go for a shower an wake myself up

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank again mr mastiff,

for replying, and trying your best for me , but things are just not regestering at the min, think i need a break from it all, but i haven't got that luxury,as my submission will have to be posted on monday, i thourght i'd be futher along with it than i actually am, think i'll go for a shower an wake myself up

 

JOhn I have the same problem at times. On my appeal letter I stated that due to my health conditions and medications it was hard for me to concentrate due to diminished cognitive abilities. I will keep an eye out for any more posts from you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

cheers mate,

im on the verge of giving in , was up this morning till half 2,back pain horrrendous through sitting in chair for so long thought is was going to go completely,got to sleep bout half 4 after usual nitely trips to bathroom ,back on laptop bout 8 this morning, an dont feel i've got any where

john

Link to post
Share on other sites

cheers mate,

im on the verge of giving in , was up this morning till half 2,back pain horrrendous through sitting in chair for so long thought is was going to go completely,got to sleep bout half 4 after usual nitely trips to bathroom ,back on laptop bout 8 this morning, an dont feel i've got any where

john

 

Keep it simple and to the point. Use your own words. If you understand it then it is easier to answer questions at the trubunal.

 

Please do not jack it in! That is what they want.

Link to post
Share on other sites

John have you done your introduction yet.

 

You then have to state why the ATOS and DM at the DWP have overestimated your abilities. Look at the ATOS assessment and look at what they got wrong. For example if they stated you could lift an empty box off the floor explain to them why you could not. If you could do it once explain why you could not do it twice. Give examples. For example you could have lifted a box up and your back had gone into spasm which made you drop the box.

 

Or have you ever had problems lifting a kettle due to your bad back causing it to spill and nearly burning yourself. Or when you are taking large amounts of your pain killers have you ever forgot to put water into the kettle and turned it on. It is not just what you can do, it is what you can do safely.

 

When you have gone out of the house have you ever had to call for help. For example have you ever suddenly not been able to walk and have been taken home by somebody else. If you have had problems state what they are and how often they occur and state why they are dangerous.

 

If the report stated you could stand easily. State how long you can stand for, what happens if you stand for too long have you ever fell over when you have tried to stand when your condition as been bad. if you have tell them.

 

Look at the assessment and say page 2 something like with reference to walking the assessment is incorrect due to the fact that I can only do ............ when I am totally well if my condition is bad I can only do .......... safely

 

take each part and do the same.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This could also apply to you.

 

On my appeal I stated that I was taking seven different types of medication four of which had warnings on to avoid driving or operating machinery, Two of the medications with the warnings on I took regularly and the other three with warnings on I took as required. At the time I was taking the maximum dose of each due to pain. I stated the Atos had not taken this into account because both my consultant and G.P had both told me not to drive or operate machinery due to the fact that I would be a danger to myself or others.

 

Were any of the answer different on the assessment to the one you can remember giving.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They ignore side effects of medication now, which is ridiculous

 

They cannot ignore the danger if you have given up your driving licence or had an injury. From what I have been to;d this as not been legally challenged yet. I would include it in case I had an accident if I was placed in the work programme. I know you are correct but i would cover myself just in case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

then i,ve started with the time of examination because the start tim an finish times are wrong

 

O.K thats Fine but it is a small point you need to focus more on why they have overestimated your physical/mental abilities. If they have incorrectly reported some detail state that but more importantly correct the detail and state why it medically prevents you from working using the descriptors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so ive gone through client interview medical conditions

other condition reported

medications

condition hisistory

solical history

description of typical day

and highlighted all the things that are wrong or miss quoted

e.g in drisciption of typical the report states "usually gets up about 10:30" but what i said is i often wake about 10:30 often in pain and i lay there till im able to get up, cud be an hour or more

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this one may relate to you.

 

repeatedly mobilise 200 metres within a reasonable timescale

because of significant discomfort or exhaustion.

 

When you are walking how does your back prevent you walking any distance. Do you get sudden weakness in the legs. Do they go numb or is the pain too great to keep doing it. What would happen if you carried on have your legs collapsed in the past.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you stated how long you can sit and stand for and what problems you have. look at the descriptors below and see if they apply to you.

b) Cannot, for the majority of the time, remain at a work station either:

(i) standing unassisted by another person (even if free to move around);

or

(ii) sitting (even in an adjustable chair)

or

(iii) a combination of (i) and (ii).

for more than 30 minutes, before needing to move away in order to avoid

significant discomfort or exhaustion.

9

© Cannot, for the majority of the time, remain at a work station, either:

(i) standing unassisted by another person (even if free to move around

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...