Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Tenancy agreement broken?? return of depost.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3969 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there, i'm in need of some advice.

 

I am a current student in Cardiff and Just moved house at the start of July.

 

My previous tenancy agreement ended on 31st June.

 

In my tenancy agreement is says; "2.5.1 The Member (letting agent) will tell the tenant within 10 working days of the end of the tenancy if they propose to make any deductions from the deposit"

 

On the tenth working day after the end, i received my closing inspection which stated;

"If there were any issues found on this inspection that could be deemed tenant responsibility, we will firstly

review evidence such as previous inspections / inventories and correspondence throughout the tenancy that

might concern the item/issue. This will allow us to ascertain if there is any tenant liability and if so, to ensure

that a fair and accurate charge to your deposit is proposed. We will contact you if this is the case and there

are any charges to apply to your deposit."

 

 

So they have not proposed if they are making any deduction or not within their stated time scale.

 

Where do I stand or what can I do?

 

I did question the letting agent about this but they said any contact including the closing inspection counts as a proposal?!

 

Sorry for the long first time post but I really need help.

 

Thanks,

Craig

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well on the closing inspection they have noted things down under "tenant damage" but have to then investigate these things by looking at previous inspections, invertories, reported problems during the year and such before they can tell us if they are making deductions or not. So they have not proposed any deductions yet in over a month.

 

So would them saying they need to investigate it be enough for them to hold it for however long?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Raydetinu, Same happened with me. The landlord did not come with any deduction proposal at all for almost a month. He came back with a deductions to be made to DPS after 40 days since end of tenancy. Does this give me any advantage when the ADR is considering the case? Or do I need to tell this specifically.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...