Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks Dx    merely trying to avoid the fees added considering the circumstances.    Will ring the council tomorrow 👌
    • you could have moved within that time in the same complex. have you this in writing - did you request a copy of the judgement CCJ AND Claimform from northants bulk?   it is NOT A FINE.....this is an extremely important point to understand no-one bar a magistrate in a magistrates criminal court can ever fine anyone for anything. Private Parking Tickets (speculative invoices) are NOT a criminal matter, merely a speculative contractual Civil matter hence they can only try a speculative monetary claim via the civil county court system (which is no more a legal powers matter than what any member of Joe Public can do). Until/unless they do raise a county court claim a CCJ and win, there are not ANY enforcement powers they can undertake other than using a DCA, whom are legally powerless and are not BAILIFFS. Penalty Charge Notices issued by local authorities etc were decriminalised years ago - meaning they no longer can progress a claim to the magistrates court to enforce, but go directly to legal enforcement via a real BAILIFF themselves. 10'000 of people waste £m's paying private parking companies because they think they are FINES...and the media do not help either. the more people read the above the less income this shark industry get. where your post said fine it now says charge dx
    • That’s really useful info, thank you. You are correct, we did not assert our rights as the issue only developed just over 7 months after purchase. When the problem arose we chose to use Mercedes via the warranty company (RAMP) After a lengthy (3 weeks) and complex investigation Mercedes could not fault find without extra hours being approved, which we reluctantly had to do. Most of the costs incurred are for labour to locate the issue. Therefore all works on the car have now been completed by Mercedes in Croydon. They have provided us with a courtesy car which we have so far had for 1 week. I’m guessing we won’t be able to wait that long for a response from Doves as Mercedes will want the balance settled?  Finance was via Santander, we luckily haven’t incurred any expenses only extreme  stress, cancel numerous arrangements and manage family life without a vehicle for 4 weeks 😢 No one seems to know who replaced the windscreen, the car has full (3 years) Mercedes service history and we have tried to contact the garage where the services were completed to see if they can shed any light but they are impossible to speak to.  Thank you again! I’ll update with a draft of our email in the morning 
    • nothing to do with the magistrates court, they are rubberstamped. council is your target. dont play silly russian roulette by hiding, always works out bad. never run from debt of any kind! the councils CTAX legal dept will be well aware the NOE thus the fees are unenforceable, but they probably dont know it was not served to your correct address.(bailiff they employed not doing their job properly!) have a chat with them, and get the org debt paid off say by small monthly sums. NEVER just pay it by a portal without human intervention as to why you are paying what because of a disputed sum. do things legally and properly  
    • Hope the tories, labor, lib dems and the chap farage shunted out are all out in clacton campaigning and pointing out that * He doesn't live there and has effectively said he doesn't even want to be there and has presented his contempt of them * Hes not just fiscally incompetent, hes fiscally lying * If they do vote for him he'll just hammer expenses and swan off doing whatever he likes at their expense
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Home Visit from HR


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3990 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

My friends daughter has been off work for two extended occasions in the past year, she suffers with ME or something similar. She has been under investigations with the hospital and her GP. Whilst she has been off work she has always supplied her employer with sickness certificates.

Today she has had a letter from her employer saying her manager and the HR department wish to visit her at home to put a work plan in place. Is this a usual course of action. The young lady is thinking this is some sort of attempt to intimidate her into resigning her job or perhaps they wish to pay her off. Does she have to let them visit her at home, can they not wait until she returns to work to put a plan in place.

I would appreciate any views on this matter.

Thank you

loring

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lots of contracts say you have to stay engaged with HR departments whilst on sick leave. Just the same I personally would not let my employers into my home. I would agree to meet somewhere quiet and local. A hotel lobby where you can get a cup of tea or a quiet coffee shop. HR are working on a return to work plan and will be starting making adjustments to get her back to the workplace. FIT notes should say what if any duties the person is able to undertake and if they say none then none it is.

 

My experience is that HR are going through a process to get your friends daughter back to work. Failure to do after making all reasonable adjustments can lead to instigation of some type of capability process ie they can get rid of her. On the other hand if she stays off sick they can probably do the same. HR departments will always say we really want the employee back but really they just want the problem sorted.

 

It is also likely they may ask her to see an occupational health official ie a doctor paid for by the company to make an assessment. Non co-operation could give a negative slant later on but if she hasn't been properly diagnosed yet she is likely to feel this HR action is inappropriate just yet. They won't. If she likes the job co-operation and negotiation will be in her interest but stress will come if they push her down a line where she isn't able. Her health is paramount and maybe she could turn up to the meeting with someone else or have it at her parents house with them present. HR will be asking what she thinks she can do at work despite the fit notes obviously saying nothing at the moment.

 

When she goes back to work she is likely to be under micro management to make sure that she only does what has been signed up to and that she does what she is asked. The reason is her company are laying the ground in case they have to dismiss her in the future.

 

This could go fine or turn ugly in the future. The company are taking care of their interests but the sick person is very rarely able to think in these terms and focused on just trying to get better or find out what is wrong with them. Home should be a sanctuary. You can cut an outside meeting short when you aren't feeling well you will struggle if they are in your house and cause you any upset. HR are trained and briefed to make a person feel valued by the company but make no mistake everyone is replaceable and they will not consider it good for business to have someone on sick leave for substantial periods of time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies

Lookingforjustice, I have forwarded your detailed response to the young lady who is going with her mother to meet her Manager and HR officer at 4.30pm. The meeting will take place at Starbucks and I let you know the outcome later.

 

Thanks

loring

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...