Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yup, well so far they have lied to me about responding to a CCA,  are threatening me with a default notice that they don't have, produced a knocked up version of my NOA, sent me 29 pages of spew for an agreement. No wonder they pay 5 p in the pound for that crap.
    • Paragraph 2. I think there should be further down and also you should make the point that the payment to was made unilaterally and without the imposition of any conditions. Paragraph 3 – this is unnecessary because you are not claiming as an entitled third-party. This worries me because it makes me feel that you haven't fully read around because this is a paragraph which you would include where you were suing EVRi as a beneficial third party because you had actually made your contract with Packlink or some other broker. I think you need to revisit and do some more reading. I'm afraid I have a sense that you have simply copied this from somebody else's witness statement without understanding that it wasn't necessary. Please can you post the amended draft. Other than the suggestions above, it looks okay – but let's see it again for a further appraisal. In terms of the evidence, parties bundle, I think it might be an idea to start off with the correspondence with EVRi and then go onto the other evidence. You will have to amend the index page accordingly. You could shorten this bit. Take 19 is pretty well blank and you may as well miss it out also, there seems to be some repetition of emails and the email chain. I think will be worth going through and getting rid of duplicates if you can. 49 pages is a bit long and it would be a good idea to try and reduce the number. I have a feeling that 50 pages as the County Court limit anyway. The judge will be happier with you if the bundle is smaller. Maybe you could reduce the size of some of the images or messages et cetera. You have got several messages which straddle onto a second page so that things like sign off information and standard confidentiality information become orphans. A bit of manipulation and they could be joined to their parents I think. Page 31 as an example. So is page 19. You may only be up to shorten the whole thing by 56 pages – but I think it would be a good idea. 56 pages is, after all, 10%. If you can do more then so much the better
    • Investment by Dutch brewing giant will create 1,000 new jobs and reopen dozens of closed pubsView the full article
    • Qantas agrees to pay millions to settle lawsuit accusing it of selling tickets to cancelled flights.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Handing keys back


Scots1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4001 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We have been left with no other option but to hand our keys back to our mortgage company! We can't put it on the market as 1/ it would take too long to sell if at all and 2/ prices have fallen so much where we are, we have a 6 year old 5 bedroom house and would be lucky if we got 160k for it now and we are in negative equity as it is.

 

We have secured a stunning rental home not too far from where we are now, the children are so excited at moving so that part is good.

 

The stigma I am finding hard to cope with, getting "that" notice slapped on the front door and the gossip that follows , I don't want the children to suffer as a result.

 

I am so cross with NRAM for doing this, we are paying our mortgage and extra towards the arrears but that isn't enough we have to get out of the house.

 

So we will move into this stunning rental house and start saving so that in a couple of years we may be able to secure a mortgage again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are paying off the arrears why do you have to leave the property? has there been an eviction notice issued or a court hearing ?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are paying off the arrears why do you have to leave the property? has there been an eviction notice issued or a court hearing ?

We got a stay of eviction back in Feb (I posted about it on my other thread) and anothe court date was set of 2 weeks ago, judge sided with NRAM saying we had broken agreement so they could proceed with eviction

Link to post
Share on other sites

We had agreed to pay of the arrears then in Nov/Dec last year we were victims of fraud, a payday loan company sent a wages arrest on my husbands wages leaving is very short of money. When we called the court who has issued the arrestment they had never heard of us, the case file number didn't exist and the "judge" that signed the letter didn't exist!!!! The"company" have since had to appear in front of the court of session in Edinburgh!! NRAM said that as their was just enough money left in our acc to pay the mortgage we should have done that but by not doing so we broke the prior agreement. WE informed them of everythin but they still started eviction proceedings

Link to post
Share on other sites

should have also said that we hadn't used nor heard of the payday loan company.

 

We just don't see that we have any other options at all than to either hand over the keys or let repossession go ahead (we will have moved out by then) . I am worried sick, not eating or sleeping, trying to sort out schools/transport/after school care for the children. NRAM say the hardship team are there to talk to but all they want is an offer to pay back the arears but we were already paying extra

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scots please don't give up. Ell-en will advise on how to defend your case but all I can say is that I have been to court on about 5 or 6 occasions over the last few years to keep my home. I have always tried to stick to arrangements but one stumble and Accord would go back to court.

 

I have despaired, not slept, not eaten, cried, but I am still paying the money back and in about 4 months it should all be repaid. I have gone without everything - no car, no holidays, little food, no luxuries, not paid non essential bills, but it can be done.

 

Judges need the full facts and to see that you are doing your very best. Are the arrears enormous? Most judges will not turn a family out of their home unless the situation is utterly hopeless and without being alarmist I think two years is very optimistic to get another mortgage. It is likely to be 6 years minimum and they will sell the house cheaply and pursue you for any shortfall.

 

Please listen to the advice you can get on here, take a deep breath and see if there is anything which can be done. Very few cases are utterly hopeless and with the help of the experts on here you might have a chance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

but the judge has already sided with NRAM, we were being represented my Shelter Scotland and they have said that it isn't worth putting an appeal in. Arrears are 9k which includes the unsecured element of our mortgage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I confess I don't understand how the law works in Scotland but this all sounds incredibly harsh from an English perspective.

 

The arrears don't sound insummountable by any means so I am wondering why Shelter have effectively given up on your behalf? And you have a genuine reason for part of the problem with the payday loan issue.

 

I don't mean to poke my nose in but I know how catastrophic a repossession can be on a credit record and I know that judges evict as a very last resort, particularly where there are young children.

 

That said, at the end of the day as long as you have your health and your family, you can make a new life for yourself. If you have been battling this for a long time I know that you can just run out of the will to go on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This has only been going on since Feb when the original eviction notice was for. I don't understand why NRAM are being so harsh on us especially when we have been paying extra to the arrears, we even offered them an extra 2k at the end of this month on top of our normal payment but that was refused at the last court date 2 weeks ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To my eyes Scot that just makes no sense whatsoever. You clearly are able to service your debt and pay extra, I simply don't know why you would be evicted if that is the case.

 

NRAM are one of the lenders who are desperate to offload their mortgages which are, or have become, sub-prime and unfortunately when you get into arrears you become like a leper as far as they are concerned, even though they are making decent profits out of you still. They are scared to death of defaults and not getting their money back, although the ridiculous thing is that forcing a sale now will ensure they do not!

 

From what I have learned on here from the experts, judges do not want to evict. I therefore cannot understand why the one who ordered the eviction sees no hope in your situation. Would it be worth appealling just to see if someone more understanding handles the next case?

Link to post
Share on other sites

We don't understand either, I have read so many cases where people go on like this for years yet one court hearing and we are out. I just don't know where to turn and my husband now just wants rid of this house

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another update

 

My husband finally managed to get to speak to some one at NRAM today and they have said we can either pay just over £900 a month and try to sell the property in 3 months (never going to happen) or pay £1200 a month to start paying off the arrears which we are going to do, it will be tight but we will manage. WE are terrified that NRAM move the goal posts again though! A letter is being sent out stating the above options. I am going to squirrel away 5k into a bank acc should any hard time arise. So we are cancelling the rental property we had found, husband still wanted to send the keys back but surely what we are going to do is better than having a repossession hanging over us.

 

Maybe in the coming days I will be able to eat and sleep again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is certainly a strange case Scots.

 

Having secured an eviction NRAM are now backing down again? And why on earth did Shelter give up so easily, telling you that it was not worth appealling?

 

Anything is better than handing the keys back. It would have been years before you would have got a mortgage again in the current climate and meanwhile you would have been wasting rental money.

 

Would you not be better off paying the £5K you have off the mortgage? That way you would be in a more comfortable position as regards the arrears and it might get them off your back for a while!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No idea why Shelter where like that. When my husband spoke to nram yesterday it turned out they had made several errors in our expenditure form and even said they thought it looked unusual but they didn't contact us!!! How ever it is sorted now. For the mean time we would rather pay the increased amount and have the 5k in an account as backup should we have a month where money is very tight so we can say use half from our bank and half from the savings, that will take us through to next year when husbands next annual bonus is due (it was late this year) when we can then give them a lump sum.

 

For the moment we are just happy that we don't have to pack up and go, we can and will get through this x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...