Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

MBNA - Alliance & Leicester - Thomas Cook credit cards


miamidancer
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4043 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am sorry about your experiences and understand what you are saying.

 

I don't think for a minute that any claims I make will be a walk in the park, I realise some may be easy and some may go down the Court route but at the end of the day, if you don't try, you will never know.

 

As the sayings go "Shy bairns get nowt" and "If you don't ask you don't get".

 

These companies are not going to come to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ken100464,

 

I appreciate your input to my thread, it does give another side of these claims to think about.

 

I may get shot down in the process, but i want to feel positive and at least say I tried.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

just to give you some encouragement in the last 12months I have received 7 PPI upholds, 4 charges refunds[hsbc,mint,barclacard,nat west] and 1 section75 refund, all from letters,spreadsheets and questionaires,no fos involvement or court action , so read and use the fsa ppi handbook and good luck! I have to add I have no experience of MBNA PPI reclaim so as Ken says could be best to inc overlimit charges reclaim in relation to ppi [as per fsahandbook p101, 3.9.2.G]

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi theoldrouge,

 

I have not been on CAG for a few weeks as I have been ill. I tried looking the fsa handbook as you suggested but it all seems to have changed since the change over in April to FCA and PRA.

 

As you have been quite successful in your claims for PPI and refund charges, if you don't mind could you give me some pointers/tips on the narrative for letters. Your assistance would be a great help to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi miami, hope your feeling better, just seen your post and yes will be happy to help where I can. First have a reread of Kens post no 23, you need to establish for certain how the PPI was sold to you- your reasons for the mis-sale are sound the policy was of no use to you. The FSA Handbook is still valid for ppi redress, have a read especially of appendix 4. Prepare your spreadsheet to send with your letter and you will also need to download and complete the FOS Questionaire. Your letter of complaint can be quiet short and to the point stick only to the valid main reasons for the mis-sale and how you were sold your policy, you can give plenty of further information in the fos questionaire but keep to the main points, a scattergun approach looks like a weak case. What has worked for me is to get an uphold first and then hit them with the further redress [ the overlimit charges] with capital one it took me seven letters but I heard today they have agreed. Any questions at all please ask

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi theoldrouge,

 

Thank you for your advice, I feel I have a good case for reclaiming the PPI as I have been on Incapacity Benefit since 2000 after an operation that went wrong. It is stated on the CCA that I was on benefits and unemployed due to illness and therefore would not have qualified for PPI.

 

I am sending my claim off tomorrow and will update as and when I receive a response.

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi miami, you must state in your letter your complaint as to how the ppi was sold to you as well as the reasons for it being mis-sold as whilst you have very good reasons as to why it was mis-sold you must also say how it was mis-sold to you. Also dont give them any phone nos to contact you,far better to have any queries in writing-it gives you time to consider the correct replies, and send by special delivery £6.20, but you get an electronic signature-they cant deny receipt of your claim

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...