Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Student Council Tax Question.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4098 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I'm a university student, during my second year I rented a house with a friend (boy) from my course and someone he had previously lived with who was a third year student (girl), we lived there between September-July and we were all full-time so we claimed an exemption for council tax. Today my friend received a letter from a bailiff at his parent's house addressed to both him and me, but not the third person, saying that we owe about £250 in unpaid council tax, we then realised that the third person had finished university in June, and was therefore no longer classed as a student for the final month we lived there, whilst both of us had another year to complete.

 

We contacted the council and they asked for an address to contact the third person, as the boy was the lead tenant on the TA only his address is on there, we managed to contact the third person and she told us she was on holiday and won't be back until the end of the month, she refused to give her address but we've managed to get her name added onto the bill.

 

I've done some research and it seems that we are not liable as we are still students (the council website states that the exemption lasts for as long as we are students) and that the third person will have to pay, is this true? If so, how do we go about making sure she pays if she refuses to give any information? Obviously we don't want to disturb her whilst she is on holiday but we are both keen that my friend's parents do not get any trouble for something that has nothing to do with them.

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you mention that the boy was the lead tenant

 

what type of tenancy agreement(s) did you have?

 

  1. did you have a joint tenancy agreement with everybody names on one agreement?
  2. were only some of you named on tenancy agreement? if so, who?
  3. did you have individual agreements?

£250 sounds like a very high council tax if it has been calculated for one month (with a 25% discount)

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

We were on a Joint Tenancy, we all signed it but only the boy's address was on it, it reads something like

 

"This is an agreement between:

Landlord, his address

and

Our names, the boy's address"

 

I originally thought that as we were all on the same agreement then we'd all be liable, but I've found some information on the NUS website which says that in our situation only the person who is liable for the tax has to pay. I agree that £250 is a lot, but I haven't yet seen the bill (I've asked him to forward me a copy) and he mentioned that some bailiff fees had been added on, I should also add that the flat was in London, in a fairly expensive area (Blackheath), although the rent was £500pcm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as it was a joint tenancy, the only person liable to pay council tax on the property is the non-student

 

i would suggest contacting the council and requesting that your name and the boy's name be removed from the bill

  • Confused 1

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brilliant, thanks very much for your help, I will be ringing the council first thing tomorrow :).

 

Any ideas on how to chase the girl for the money? We don't know her address (have tried 192, BT, the letting agent etc with no luck) and it looks like she won't give it to us, or is it the council's problem?

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

really it is the council's problem

 

i suspect they might be a bit funny/reluctant about removing your names without knowing her address, but stick to your guns

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Renya, my son was a student in London and had a similar problem.

 

I just happened to be at his house one day and answered the door to Bailiff's and I got the impression the they were preparing to clamp my car which was on the drive!

 

I told them in no uncertain terms that the bill related to previous tenants and the present occupants (all students) were not liable and they went away without any problem.

 

I thought I would warn you just in case so ensure that the council get your names removed. It took my son a while to get it sorted but he didn't have any more knocks on the door.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dotty,

 

Sounds scary! Funnily enough whilst we were living at the flat we got a note through the door in the from a bailiff in the previous tenant's names saying we owed them £600 worth of Council Tax, we phoned them and told them it was nothing to do with us but they still visited once more, we showed them our agreement and didn't hear anything else, here's hoping this won't take too much time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...