Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

esa tribunal


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4103 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i had my esa tribunal today and broke down in front of the judge and doctor.it lasted 20 minutes and was told at the end i would get the decision in the post.can someone who has gone through this tell me how long it takes to get the decision

Link to post
Share on other sites

it all depends i know when they send the decision notices by post i was told there all done in batches but when i went with my sister to hers she was told on the same day,

 

it might be a week or so but some people have waited longer for there decision maybe call the tribunals service or JCP Friday next week see if yours has been sent out and what the decision was

 

hope all went well for you xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am going through the same as you, almost identical although I came off the pain patches due to allergy and now take Oxycodone. You first need to ask for a Reconsideration from the DWP, include as much information as possible as to how you meet the Support Group criteria (maybe the Special Circumstances part). If you get turned down, which you probably will, then you need to GL24 form it and this leads to a SECOND consideration. If they still reject this then you get forwarded to the Tribunal Service. Do all this as soon as possible as there's 28 day timelimits. You can't appeal to the Upper Tier Tribunal unless the Tribunal made an error of Law, rather than an error of judgement. Always remember that it's the DWP staff that award benefits, then can even try and reject the findings of a tribunal if they're feeling brave (and stupid).

 

I know all this because I'm just waiting for a tribunal date. :roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

got my results today and have been placed in the WRAG anyone know how i go about appealing this im currently on morphine patches due to severe pain and they leave me and a sort of zombified state

 

Are you thinking that because you are on 'morphine patches that leave you in a zombified state' you should be in the Support Group?

Personally I can't see that the conditions of that group would apply to you. I may be wrong, but you have to be pretty seriously ill to get into that group.

 

I am prescribed 100mg of 12 hours lasting Morphine (MST) twice a day (200mg daily) topped up with 120mg (60ml) or Oramorph (quick acting oral Morphine) daily and I can't even get onto ESA - I was told to get a job!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you thinking that because you are on 'morphine patches that leave you in a zombified state' you should be in the Support Group?

Personally I can't see that the conditions of that group would apply to you. I may be wrong, but you have to be pretty seriously ill to get into that group.

 

I am prescribed 100mg of 12 hours lasting Morphine (MST) twice a day (200mg daily) topped up with 120mg (60ml) or Oramorph (quick acting oral Morphine) daily and I can't even get onto ESA - I was told to get a job!!

 

Cleaver, the DWP will always try to say you have to get a job. I have a list of illnesses so long I could write a book. I literally have days when I can't get out of bed to pee or wipe my bum on the toilet. I was told I was fit for work. My tribunal put me in the WRAG only because they had to base it on how I was a YEAR before the tribunal. I'm now applying for SG because I've gotten much worse.

 

I know people who are in the SG just because they get angry when under pressure, it's not so much to do with illness as how it would cause a problem in the work environment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your tribunal has to be based on how you were at the time of the assessment and not now.

 

Exactly, I had my assessment in December 2011 and the Tribunal in November 2012! Even though they could see I was worse they kept explaining that it HAD to be based on December 2011. They were just as frustrated as me, especially as I had a first Tribunal in March that had to be delayed as the DWP had provided zero medical evidence or included some of my illnesses!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now you can't mix the two medical conditions ! If you get Morhine for you mental illness, it can't be used. However if your on it because of a bad back you can ?

 

As pointed out too... You must meet a certain condition to get the points to get into the SG ...

 

I'm waiting my medical :???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what you're getting at; but the new changes are:

- if you're on medication, they don't take the side effects into account. For example, if your medication makes you drowsy, that's ignored. But if the drowsiness is due to a physical disability, they'll take that into account.

- if you have depression as a result of a physical disability, the depression is ignored.

 

Not sure how the latter can be proved or disproved though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The whole system is a farce. I've been discussing it with my ME/CFS specialist and we both come to the conclusion that it needs to be tried in court as diseases like ME/CFS and Fibromyalgia are confirmed by the WHO to be both Physical and Mental yet the DWP don't agree.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because there is a neurological component and in DWP world neuro=mental. Truth is, as there's no definite test (eg scan, blood test) it is still viewed by many medical professionals as being 'all in the head'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...